| Title |
Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015477 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolina Graña, Lina Ghosn, Theodoros Evrenoglou, Alexander Jarde, Silvia Minozzi, Hanna Bergman, Brian S Buckley, Katrin Probyn, Gemma Villanueva, Nicholas Henschke, Hillary Bonnet, Rouba Assi, Sonia Menon, Melanie Marti, Declan Devane, Patrick Mallon, Jean-Daniel Lelievre, Lisa M Askie, Tamara Kredo, Gabriel Ferrand, Mauricia Davidson, Carolina Riveros, David Tovey, Joerg J Meerpohl, Giacomo Grasselli, Gabriel Rada, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Philippe Ravaud, Anna Chaimani, Isabelle Boutron |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,300 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 102 | 8% |
| Spain | 75 | 6% |
| Germany | 63 | 5% |
| United States | 60 | 5% |
| Brazil | 36 | 3% |
| France | 32 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 27 | 2% |
| Canada | 19 | 1% |
| Mexico | 15 | 1% |
| Other | 119 | 9% |
| Unknown | 752 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1138 | 88% |
| Scientists | 86 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 56 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 20 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 192 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 104 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 108 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1030. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#14,459
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 12,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#450
of 467,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.