↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Screening for breast cancer with mammography

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 11,727)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
581 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Screening for breast cancer with mammography
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001877.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter C Gøtzsche, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen

Abstract

A variety of estimates of the benefits and harms of mammographic screening for breast cancer have been published and national policies vary.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 781 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 1083 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 167 15%
Student > Master 138 12%
Researcher 77 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 66 6%
Other 168 15%
Unknown 414 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 353 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 74 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 3%
Engineering 21 2%
Other 149 13%
Unknown 443 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 830. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#11,420
of 17,648,139 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 11,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56
of 165,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,648,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.