RT @stevekippax: @JacquiDeevoy1 And here is and excellent piece by Prof Gotzsche... Mammograms are worse then useless..... https://t.co/SV2…

RT @stevekippax: @JacquiDeevoy1 And here is and excellent piece by Prof Gotzsche... Mammograms are worse then useless..... https://t.co/SV2…

RT @stevekippax: @JacquiDeevoy1 And here is and excellent piece by Prof Gotzsche... Mammograms are worse then useless..... https://t.co/SV2…

RT @stevekippax: @JacquiDeevoy1 And here is and excellent piece by Prof Gotzsche... Mammograms are worse then useless..... https://t.co/SV2…

RT @stevekippax: @JacquiDeevoy1 And here is and excellent piece by Prof Gotzsche... Mammograms are worse then useless..... https://t.co/SV2…

🚨 Mammograms 'If we assume that screening reduces breast cancer mortality by 15% and that overdiagnosis and overtreatment is at 30%, it means that for every 2000 women invited for screening throughout 10 years, one will avoid dying of breast cancer and 1

@JacquiDeevoy1 And here is and excellent piece by Prof Gotzsche... Mammograms are worse then useless..... https://t.co/SV2ZJsMvLG

@rainiero43 https://t.co/9jCvZ7zEbK Leggete anche questi di dati

@SF_DPH This is simply not true. Mammograms cause net harm through iatrogenic overdiagnosis and overtreatment. https://t.co/XiMeWtN7Te

@maipurper Pior que tem um Dinamarquês que levou esse tema a sério e fez um estudo com 2000 mulheres. Chegou a conclusão que a mamografia salvava apenas 1 ao longo de 10 anos. https://t.co/AJlG82xX73 Como o exame é muito invasivo, o artigo deixa até uma c

RT @MaryanneDemasi: A Cochrane review in 2013 (and an unpublished update in Jan 2023) also found mammography screening had no impact on the…

@MartinG39205538 @calotonterias Tu ni lees ni entiendes lo poco que lees Revision Cochrane: https://t.co/C68MWWcQUg Pongo un recorte y resumo la parte más interesante: ningún beneficio entre el grupo de cribado y no cribado despues de 10 años en mortalidad

@teresaoliveros4 Teresa, lo que importa es la evidencia. La Cochrane hace 10 años que dice esto: https://t.co/bEuzFHshX8

@ta_chipiron3 No tengo suscripción ahí, pero si puedo consultar la Cochrane que ofrece el grado más alto de evidencia https://t.co/3Alzldb4Nz

@ta_chipiron3 https://t.co/3Alzldb4Nz

@ta_chipiron3 https://t.co/3Alzldb4Nz

@ta_chipiron3 https://t.co/3Alzldb4Nz

@YvesCoppieters Bonjour, quelle est votre analyse de l'étude Cochrane de 2013, et celle de 2023 qui ré-évalue et confirme les résultats de Cochrane en 2013 ? https://t.co/YdEgRpfDmd https://t.co/WCJpYwLBGD

RT @ebbookz: @Castoropollux2 Här är studien - 10 år sedan. https://t.co/m4Yue0oDhU

@Castoropollux2 Här är studien - 10 år sedan. https://t.co/m4Yue0oDhU

@lyaline13 @gingerbun_ @di_sinusoida https://t.co/95rny8Dhev https://t.co/k1FyKjqbK7

@magnusisacson Denna är gammal men på samma tema. Vet inte om det finns nyare översikter från Cochrane eller andra? https://t.co/5jTpyVGId8

@Shora La "detección precoz" del cáncer de mama es igualmente riesgosa e ineficaz. https://t.co/0ZQJvK2umZ

@QuiDam93688277 @Boud_Boulette @Berentrice https://t.co/0rEABKgd7l

@donkey13992730 @naika_hashikure あるいはこれ https://t.co/ryIvid7x82

@frobelserbin @dokhollidays Hier eine Auswertung des Cochrane Instituts. Der Nutzen scheint tatsächlich nicht groß zu sein. https://t.co/ogfgmkkVB0

@Jason @friedberg Cancer screening is a tricky subject. Even mammograms and colonoscopies show no mortality benefit. Colonoscopy: https://t.co/y7uNJtgglT Mammography: https://t.co/EoDCMzGiaW

"il est impossible d'identifier les femmes, qui risquent de subir une ablation et de recevoir une radiothérapie inutilement" "Les femmes invitées à participer à un dépistage devraient être pleinement informées des effets bénéfiques et délétères" https:

Revue @CochraneLibrary sur le sujet : "Les études les plus fiables montraient que le dépistage ne réduisait pas la mortalité par cancer du sein" "Les études qui étaient les plus biaisées indiquaient que le dépistage réduisait la mortalité" https://t.c

RT @albert_twostone: @anna46977604 Die Strahlenbelastung ist nicht vernachlässigbar und der Nutzen fragwürdig. "Die Studien, welche die ver…

@anna46977604 Die Strahlenbelastung ist nicht vernachlässigbar und der Nutzen fragwürdig. "Die Studien, welche die verlässlichsten Informationen lieferten, zeigten, dass das Screening die Sterblichkeitsrate von Brustkrebs nicht vermindert." https://t.co/

@susanl_author Are the 'cold hard facts' about mammography screening also telling some folk 'Things They Don't Want to Hear'? https://t.co/N01vq9iBdE

RT @Liz_ORiordan: 1/3 Several of you replied saying your reason for not having a screening mammogram was the Cochrane report https://t.co…

It must be hard (impossible) to be objective when you've got breast ca, but even more reason to be careful @Liz_ORiordan. Age-X RCT trial data to come, but I dont trust researchers (biased protocol) - we need independent analysis https://t.co/2hSZKCTbBs

@susan_bewley @suzanne_baum What is the evidence? What does it show? 1) Evidence is from 11 RCTs, women randomised between 1963 & 1997 - no trial evidence from last 25 years 2) Effect on all cause mortality after 7yrs follow up shown in picture https:

@Liz_ORiordan When my wife got the call she asked my advice. I suggested she read the Cochrane review. https://t.co/oW94ctJu5M. She did & said, "well that's not worth it." I agreed with her. She didn't go. Wise woman my wife.

RT @Liz_ORiordan: 1/3 Several of you replied saying your reason for not having a screening mammogram was the Cochrane report https://t.co…

RT @Liz_ORiordan: 1/3 Several of you replied saying your reason for not having a screening mammogram was the Cochrane report https://t.co…

Shame on you. You censored our publication at the BMJ. But the truth is inescapable. #mammography https://t.co/8DEezkabrI

1/3 Several of you replied saying your reason for not having a screening mammogram was the Cochrane report https://t.co/x1vfRmOIpk BUT did you know that the author also wrote… https://t.co/TEy9XR2bic

@lina_p31 @JacquiFromSheff @Liz_ORiordan Read the evidence yourself. Because of lead time bias, the only worthwhile evidence is from randomised controlled trials. There are only a handful of RCTs & the results are not conclusive. https://t.co/N01vq9i

@Liz_ORiordan Or is it because they read the Cochrane review & concluded they didn’t think there was any evidence of benefit? https://t.co/N01vq9iBdE

RT @TomPMarshall: @e_considine @VPrasadMDMPH 1) the burden of proof of effectiveness is on those proposing an intervention - especially in…

RT @TomPMarshall: @e_considine @VPrasadMDMPH 1) the burden of proof of effectiveness is on those proposing an intervention - especially in…

RT @MaryanneDemasi: A Cochrane review in 2013 (and an unpublished update in Jan 2023) also found mammography screening had no impact on the…

The most impressive negative result though is that of mammography, as with millions of women screened there have been no conclusive evidence that Overall Survival is improved. https://t.co/XKJy4vSFDv

RT @TomPMarshall: @e_considine @VPrasadMDMPH 1) the burden of proof of effectiveness is on those proposing an intervention - especially in…

RT @TomPMarshall: @e_considine @VPrasadMDMPH 1) the burden of proof of effectiveness is on those proposing an intervention - especially in…

RT @TomPMarshall: @e_considine @VPrasadMDMPH 1) the burden of proof of effectiveness is on those proposing an intervention - especially in…

RT @TomPMarshall: @e_considine @VPrasadMDMPH 1) the burden of proof of effectiveness is on those proposing an intervention - especially in…

RT @TomPMarshall: @e_considine @VPrasadMDMPH 1) the burden of proof of effectiveness is on those proposing an intervention - especially in…

RT @TomPMarshall: @e_considine @VPrasadMDMPH 1) the burden of proof of effectiveness is on those proposing an intervention - especially in…

RT @TomPMarshall: @e_considine @VPrasadMDMPH 1) the burden of proof of effectiveness is on those proposing an intervention - especially in…

RT @TomPMarshall: @e_considine @VPrasadMDMPH 1) the burden of proof of effectiveness is on those proposing an intervention - especially in…

@e_considine @VPrasadMDMPH 1) the burden of proof of effectiveness is on those proposing an intervention - especially in healthy people. Not “why doesn’t it work?” 2) the evidence for mammography screening doesn’t meet that standard We’ve known this for y

RT @MaryanneDemasi: A Cochrane review in 2013 (and an unpublished update in Jan 2023) also found mammography screening had no impact on the…

RT @MaryanneDemasi: A Cochrane review in 2013 (and an unpublished update in Jan 2023) also found mammography screening had no impact on the…

RT @MaryanneDemasi: A Cochrane review in 2013 (and an unpublished update in Jan 2023) also found mammography screening had no impact on the…

RT @MaryanneDemasi: A Cochrane review in 2013 (and an unpublished update in Jan 2023) also found mammography screening had no impact on the…

A Cochrane review in 2013 (and an unpublished update in Jan 2023) also found mammography screening had no impact on the most important outcome, i.e. overall (all-cause) mortality. https://t.co/7AARuhLmQd

@janhue @VigilantFox Saadly the case for mammogram screening is not so clear cut as one would hoop. See for ex this study from Cochrane https://t.co/5jTpyVGId8

RT @AsdrubalFF: @gorka_orive Los expertos debieran saber esto: https://t.co/0ZQJvK2umZ

הרפואה ממשיכה בצעדי ענק לאבחון יתר שיוביל לטיפולים מיותרים. לייצר מצג שווא של שיפור בעוד המציאות מראה נזק מטורף של אלגוריתמים רפואיים. ואתם רשאים לשאול מי המרוויחים… ממוגרפיה PSA סטטינים . . . https://t.co/dKGSvo7MfK

@gorka_orive Los expertos debieran saber esto: https://t.co/0ZQJvK2umZ

@Shora @pitrinila Muy cuestionable. https://t.co/0ZQJvK2umZ

@VScienco @Coloidesoxigeno @CancerIntegral Veo tus revisiones de 2003 y subo a una revisión sistemática metaanalítica cochrane de 2013 Donde concluyen "studies show more overdiagnosis than in the trials and very little or no reduction in the incidence of

@bbthomasen @VPrasadMDMPH Cochrane thinks this is a wise choice. Mammography is the poster child for overdiagnosis, low value screening. https://t.co/cSpf63TRvE

Please read

From 2013; 'for every 2000 women invited for screening, 1 avoid dying of breast cancer + 10 healthy women, who would not have been diagnosed if there had not been screening, will be treated unnecessarily.' Screening for breast cancer with mammography https

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Still one of the best Cochrane reports @PGtzsche1 @KarstenJuhl https://t.co/1CjI2Bo5tt

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Still one of the best Cochrane reports @PGtzsche1 @KarstenJuhl https://t.co/1CjI2Bo5tt

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Still one of the best Cochrane reports @PGtzsche1 @KarstenJuhl https://t.co/1CjI2Bo5tt

And here in Australia, mammography screening is taking place at explosive numbers! Why don’t we follow the evidence?

Screening for breast cancer with mammography “Recent observational studies show more overdiagnosis than in the trials and very little or no reduction in the incidence of advanced cancers with screening.” #Cochrane #breastcancer #screening

I did not realize the evidence was so weak in favor of population-based breast cancer screening. "We believe that the time has come to re‐assess whether universal mammography screening should be recommended for any age group." Cochrane Review in 2013: htt

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Still one of the best Cochrane reports @PGtzsche1 @KarstenJuhl https://t.co/1CjI2Bo5tt

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Still one of the best Cochrane reports @PGtzsche1 @KarstenJuhl https://t.co/1CjI2Bo5tt

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Still one of the best Cochrane reports @PGtzsche1 @KarstenJuhl https://t.co/1CjI2Bo5tt

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Still one of the best Cochrane reports @PGtzsche1 @KarstenJuhl https://t.co/1CjI2Bo5tt

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Still one of the best Cochrane reports @PGtzsche1 @KarstenJuhl https://t.co/1CjI2Bo5tt

RT @Lisataudio: Important info. I will be skipping my yearly mammogram this year. No history of cancer in my family. If you keep looking fo…

If anyone thought the mask review was controversial... https://t.co/vSfWZyz0Fl

Important info. I will be skipping my yearly mammogram this year. No history of cancer in my family. If you keep looking for something eventually you will find it.

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Still one of the best Cochrane reports @PGtzsche1 @KarstenJuhl https://t.co/1CjI2Bo5tt

Mammography: "..for every 2000 women invited for screening throughout 10 years, one will avoid dying of breast cancer and 10 healthy women, who would not have been diagnosed if there had not been screening, will be treated unnecessarily."

Still one of the best Cochrane reports @PGtzsche1 @KarstenJuhl https://t.co/1CjI2Bo5tt

RT @Mangan150: Does screening for breast cancer with mammography save lives? "trials with adequate randomisation did not find an effect of…

RT @Mangan150: Does screening for breast cancer with mammography save lives? "trials with adequate randomisation did not find an effect of…

RT @Mangan150: Does screening for breast cancer with mammography save lives? "trials with adequate randomisation did not find an effect of…

https://t.co/iybsyPVXJo

RT @Mangan150: Does screening for breast cancer with mammography save lives? "trials with adequate randomisation did not find an effect of…

RT @Mangan150: Does screening for breast cancer with mammography save lives? "trials with adequate randomisation did not find an effect of…

RT @Mangan150: Does screening for breast cancer with mammography save lives? "trials with adequate randomisation did not find an effect of…

RT @Mangan150: Does screening for breast cancer with mammography save lives? "trials with adequate randomisation did not find an effect of…

RT @Mangan150: Does screening for breast cancer with mammography save lives? "trials with adequate randomisation did not find an effect of…

RT @Mangan150: Does screening for breast cancer with mammography save lives? "trials with adequate randomisation did not find an effect of…

RT @Mangan150: Does screening for breast cancer with mammography save lives? "trials with adequate randomisation did not find an effect of…

RT @Mangan150: Does screening for breast cancer with mammography save lives? "trials with adequate randomisation did not find an effect of…

RT @Mangan150: Does screening for breast cancer with mammography save lives? "trials with adequate randomisation did not find an effect of…

O rastreamento do câncer de mama com #mamografia salva vidas? "estudos com randomização não encontraram efeito do rastreamento na mortalidade total por câncer, incluindo câncer de mama, após 10 anos... ou na mortalidade por todas as causas após 13 anos." h