↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
75 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
782 Mendeley
Title
Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006672.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vigdis Aasheim, Anne Britt Vika Nilsen, Liv Merete Reinar, Mirjam Lukasse

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 782 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 782 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 122 16%
Student > Master 79 10%
Student > Postgraduate 63 8%
Researcher 53 7%
Other 49 6%
Other 117 15%
Unknown 299 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 193 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 183 23%
Social Sciences 17 2%
Psychology 10 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 1%
Other 55 7%
Unknown 316 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#353,024
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#603
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,403
of 335,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.