| Title |
Self‐management interventions including action plans for exacerbations versus usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011682.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anke Lenferink, Marjolein Brusse‐Keizer, Paul DLPM van der Valk, Peter A Frith, Marlies Zwerink, Evelyn M Monninkhof, Job van der Palen, Tanja W Effing |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
| Spain | 5 | 10% |
| Germany | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 752 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 751 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 124 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 83 | 11% |
| Researcher | 74 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 40 | 5% |
| Other | 124 | 16% |
| Unknown | 244 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 175 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 148 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 5% |
| Psychology | 31 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 80 | 11% |
| Unknown | 269 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#751,300
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,393
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,398
of 331,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.