↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Self‐management interventions including action plans for exacerbations versus usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
47 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
272 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
759 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Self‐management interventions including action plans for exacerbations versus usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011682.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anke Lenferink, Marjolein Brusse‐Keizer, Paul DLPM van der Valk, Peter A Frith, Marlies Zwerink, Evelyn M Monninkhof, Job van der Palen, Tanja W Effing

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 759 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 758 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 122 16%
Student > Bachelor 83 11%
Researcher 76 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 5%
Other 124 16%
Unknown 250 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 177 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 145 19%
Social Sciences 35 5%
Psychology 31 4%
Sports and Recreations 15 2%
Other 80 11%
Unknown 276 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#793,148
of 26,222,113 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,406
of 13,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,849
of 332,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,222,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.