↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
20 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
316 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
715 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007482.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona M Smaill, Rosalie M Grivell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 715 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 709 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 97 14%
Student > Bachelor 89 12%
Researcher 58 8%
Student > Postgraduate 54 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 6%
Other 140 20%
Unknown 231 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 283 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 29 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 2%
Other 63 9%
Unknown 258 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#831,210
of 26,103,952 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,495
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,871
of 275,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,103,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.