↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
42 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
307 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
692 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007482.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona M Smaill, Rosalie M Grivell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 692 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 686 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 95 14%
Student > Bachelor 91 13%
Researcher 57 8%
Student > Postgraduate 53 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 7%
Other 142 21%
Unknown 208 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 282 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 29 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 2%
Other 66 10%
Unknown 234 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#650,458
of 25,385,864 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,200
of 12,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,909
of 269,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.