↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
49 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
520 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007482.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona M Smaill, Rosalie M Grivell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 520 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 514 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 16%
Student > Bachelor 76 15%
Researcher 50 10%
Student > Postgraduate 43 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 7%
Other 114 22%
Unknown 116 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 237 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 2%
Other 50 10%
Unknown 138 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2021.
All research outputs
#431,674
of 19,998,134 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#891
of 12,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,808
of 249,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,998,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.