Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Patrick Brass, Martin Hellmich, Laurentius Kolodziej, Guido Schick, Andrew F Smith
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||25||74%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||5||15%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||6%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||47||12%|
|Student > Bachelor||42||11%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||26||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||191||48%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||46||12%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||5||1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,343,193 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 360,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,343,193 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.