@GloOrtizMiluy Llama la atención que luego, en la Cochrane, no se aprecien grandes diferencias...🤔 La heterogenicidad de los estudios (y, en algunos casos, su calidad metodológica) facilita que se diluya el efecto de la ecografía... https://t.co/db7GBN4DiQ
@sargsyanz @paulfcurrier @CNemehMD @HeyDrHay_Ward https://t.co/GBD1a6fZti This is what I base my practice off of- as of 2015 some evidence, but ultimately Cochrane review could not recommend it as standard of care. https://t.co/Jkn9rxY4cS
@MRamzyDO @srrezaie @EMSwami @POCUS_Society @pocusfoamed @coreultrasound @mikestonemd @UltrasoundMD @UltrasoundJelly @cianmcdermott @RubbleEM @DrKittyKat @Amyjwal @CreaghB @ACEP_EUS @NephroP Great post/cast! Prior RCT has shown the same https://t.co/f6R3LT
@MarcioBoniatti @dvarvaki Agree. Little in medicine is “Mandatory” and “only €4000” is ignorant. If not rejected, briefly address the comment acknowledging “while likely safer in experienced, not always available and our approach is not considered outside
RT @SeeFisch: Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/…
RT @SeeFisch: Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/…
RT @SeeFisch: Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/…
RT @SeeFisch: Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/…
RT @SeeFisch: Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/…
RT @SeeFisch: Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/…
RT @SeeFisch: Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/…
Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/glgzDelTYC
@HeyDrNik @Rick_Pescatore @raw_em_md @drjgutt @MDaware @emily_fri @DrLizaMD @EMHighAK @ZackRepEM @elewMD @mizuhomorrison @theABofPharmaC @sreeja_natesan @njoshi8 @PulmCrit @emeddoc @PedEMMorsels @WUSTL_EM I think it's all operator dependent. https://t.co/Y
@movinmeat @medevidenceblog @MarkHoofnagle @GoodishIntent @choo_ek @laxswamy @katiewiskar @accpchest @PulmCrit @ChrisWorsham @SapnaKmd @BUPulmonary @ATSfellows that's... not the apt analogy here. because central line attempts fail, complications happen. ht
@jddneary @KallirroiLaiya @MeraliZahra @hfranco85 https://t.co/ks9FUaKZtJ -- for subclavian "No evidence was found of a difference in total or other complications (together, US, USD), overall (together, US, USD), number of attempts until success (US) or fi
Cochrane meta-analysis in favour https://t.co/IVNN7zxaJ0 Bernd Saugel #ISICEM18 https://t.co/mTXEuvvJyh
US may help with central venous cannulation https://t.co/dQDqS0fC8I
US may help with central venous cannulation https://t.co/aEJdC1BJeE
RT @avkwong: Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization: https://t.co/DlnJLmaGIZ #LIVES…
Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization: https://t.co/DlnJLmaGIZ #LIVES2016
@HildenLA You would think so, but there is little evidence of a reduced rate of complications. http://t.co/BxVNfWmKSI
Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization http://t.co/7hrjFfRj14
http://t.co/CrYefC1Xez In subclavian or femoral CVC, 2D (US) and Doppler US-guided techniques do not differ for complication rates
超音波ガイド中心静脈カテーテルについてのコクランレビュー。鎖骨下（腋窩）静脈では合併症（血腫、動脈穿刺）が減り、大腿静脈では1回目の穿刺での成功率が高くなるという結果。 http://t.co/3BFOH732pz
超音波ガイド中心静脈カテーテルについてのコクランレビュー。鎖骨下（腋窩）静脈では合併症（血腫、動脈穿刺）が減り、大腿静脈では1回目の穿刺での成功率が高くなるという結果。 http://t.co/3BFOH732pz
超音波ガイド中心静脈カテーテルについてのコクランレビュー。鎖骨下（腋窩）静脈では合併症（血腫、動脈穿刺）が減り、大腿静脈では1回目の穿刺での成功率が高くなるという結果。 http://t.co/3BFOH732pz
超音波ガイド中心静脈カテーテルについてのコクランレビュー。鎖骨下（腋窩）静脈では合併症（血腫、動脈穿刺）が減り、大腿静脈では1回目の穿刺での成功率が高くなるという結果。 http://t.co/3BFOH732pz
@ChrisCarrollMD @ketaminh cochrane on IJ lines http://t.co/dq2oMFgIxa and subclavian lines http://t.co/azc9tZA4YH #foamed #pulmcc
The latest on US for CVC placement : http://t.co/hXzEDPLweF http://t.co/LDbo9mvNDi http://t.co/3FF7EIwTiY
The latest on US for CVC placement : http://t.co/hXzEDPLweF http://t.co/LDbo9mvNDi http://t.co/3FF7EIwTiY
Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization "On the basis of... http://t.co/5oRac28HE6
"Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization." http://t.co/qikLgcR181
Cochrane on USS for IJV likes http://t.co/JM692npgRe And femoral/subclav http://t.co/nyKf5sokdw HT @cabreraERDR #foamed #foamus
Cochrane on USS for IJV likes http://t.co/JM692npgRe And femoral/subclav http://t.co/nyKf5sokdw HT @cabreraERDR #foamed #foamus
Cochrane on USS for IJV likes http://t.co/JM692npgRe And femoral/subclav http://t.co/nyKf5sokdw HT @cabreraERDR #foamed #foamus
Cochrane on USS for IJV likes http://t.co/JM692npgRe And femoral/subclav http://t.co/nyKf5sokdw HT @cabreraERDR #foamed #foamus
Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization http://t.co/4pD4JeOrkt http://t.co/ifQzZU7JIQ