↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hormone therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post‐menopausal women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
431 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
642 Mendeley
Title
Hormone therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post‐menopausal women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002229.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henry MP Boardman, Louise Hartley, Anne Eisinga, Caroline Main, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Xavier Bonfill Cosp, Rafael Gabriel Sanchez, Beatrice Knight

Abstract

Evidence from systematic reviews of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women, however the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have had mixed results. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review published in 2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 642 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 630 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 87 14%
Student > Bachelor 79 12%
Researcher 71 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 9%
Student > Postgraduate 38 6%
Other 132 21%
Unknown 175 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 234 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 3%
Psychology 14 2%
Other 78 12%
Unknown 208 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 253. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#146,362
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#266
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,567
of 274,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.