↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hormone therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
256 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
452 Mendeley
Title
Hormone therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002229.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henry MP Boardman, Louise Hartley, Anne Eisinga, Caroline Main, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Xavier Bonfill Cosp, Rafael Gabriel Sanchez, Beatrice Knight

Abstract

Evidence from systematic reviews of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women, however the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have had mixed results. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review published in 2013.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 440 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 18%
Researcher 53 12%
Student > Bachelor 52 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 11%
Student > Postgraduate 36 8%
Other 95 21%
Unknown 85 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 179 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 4%
Psychology 12 3%
Other 59 13%
Unknown 112 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#116,779
of 17,968,541 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#225
of 11,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,731
of 224,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,968,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.