↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008001.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan GT Payne, Nabeel HM Alsabeeha, Momen A Atieh, Marco Esposito, Sunyoung Ma, Marwah Anas El-Wegoud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 206 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 18%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Postgraduate 23 11%
Other 11 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 69 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Engineering 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 72 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#905,736
of 21,429,365 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,064
of 12,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,087
of 294,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,429,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.