↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008001.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan GT Payne, Nabeel HM Alsabeeha, Momen A Atieh, Marco Esposito, Sunyoung Ma, Marwah Anas El-Wegoud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 21%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Postgraduate 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 7 5%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Engineering 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 35 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#782,027
of 17,593,470 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,998
of 11,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,337
of 283,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,593,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.