↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
345 Mendeley
Title
Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009115.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Genevieve McArthur, Yumi Sheehan, Nicholas A Badcock, Deanna A Francis, Hua-Chen Wang, Saskia Kohnen, Erin Banales, Thushara Anandakumar, Eva Marinus, Anne Castles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 343 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 15%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 8%
Researcher 22 6%
Other 17 5%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 135 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 8%
Social Sciences 25 7%
Linguistics 14 4%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 144 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,873,899
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,151
of 12,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,184
of 348,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.