↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
Title
Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009115.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Genevieve McArthur, Yumi Sheehan, Nicholas A Badcock, Deanna A Francis, Hua-Chen Wang, Saskia Kohnen, Erin Banales, Thushara Anandakumar, Eva Marinus, Anne Castles

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 275 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 17%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Researcher 18 6%
Other 13 5%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 97 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Social Sciences 22 8%
Linguistics 8 3%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 103 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,555,888
of 20,535,273 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,686
of 12,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,941
of 418,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,535,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.