| Title |
Fortification of maize flour with iron for controlling anaemia and iron deficiency in populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010187.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria N Garcia‐Casal, Juan Pablo Peña‐Rosas, Luz Maria De‐Regil, Jeffrey A Gwirtz, Sant‐Rayn Pasricha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 4 | 31% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 498 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 498 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 12% |
| Researcher | 54 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 77 | 15% |
| Unknown | 189 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 70 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 19 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 76 | 15% |
| Unknown | 210 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,097,463
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,411
of 13,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,376
of 449,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.