| Title |
Interventions using social networking sites to promote contraception in women of reproductive age
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012521.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aalaa Jawad, Issrah Jawad, Nisreen A Alwan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 47% |
| Spain | 2 | 12% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 249 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 13% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 111 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 8% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 123 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,637,724
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,298
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,747
of 369,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#121
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.