↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of doctor-nurse substitution strategies in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
119 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
456 Mendeley
Title
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of doctor-nurse substitution strategies in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010412.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akram Karimi-Shahanjarini, Elham Shakibazadeh, Arash Rashidian, Khadijeh Hajimiri, Claire Glenton, Jane Noyes, Simon Lewin, Miranda Laurant, Christopher J Colvin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 452 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 82 18%
Researcher 50 11%
Student > Bachelor 46 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 9%
Student > Postgraduate 24 5%
Other 100 22%
Unknown 115 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 127 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 84 18%
Social Sciences 28 6%
Unspecified 21 5%
Psychology 12 3%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 127 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#338,316
of 21,806,258 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#628
of 12,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,784
of 290,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,806,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.