↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of doctor‐nurse substitution strategies in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
112 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
620 Mendeley
Title
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of doctor‐nurse substitution strategies in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010412.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akram Karimi‐Shahanjarini, Elham Shakibazadeh, Arash Rashidian, Khadijeh Hajimiri, Claire Glenton, Jane Noyes, Simon Lewin, Miranda Laurant, Christopher J Colvin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 620 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 616 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 104 17%
Researcher 61 10%
Student > Bachelor 54 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 7%
Other 29 5%
Other 127 20%
Unknown 200 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 154 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 106 17%
Social Sciences 33 5%
Unspecified 24 4%
Psychology 16 3%
Other 69 11%
Unknown 218 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#454,100
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#803
of 11,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,110
of 364,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.