↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of doctor-nurse substitution strategies in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
120 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
Title
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of doctor-nurse substitution strategies in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010412.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akram Karimi-Shahanjarini, Elham Shakibazadeh, Arash Rashidian, Khadijeh Hajimiri, Claire Glenton, Jane Noyes, Simon Lewin, Miranda Laurant, Christopher J Colvin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 338 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 19%
Researcher 44 13%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 9%
Student > Postgraduate 20 6%
Other 74 22%
Unknown 73 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 104 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 65 19%
Social Sciences 25 7%
Unspecified 17 5%
Psychology 9 3%
Other 39 11%
Unknown 83 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#282,069
of 17,659,018 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#585
of 11,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,824
of 277,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,659,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.