↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
238 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
535 Mendeley
Title
Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004407.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vittorio Demicheli, Alessandro Rivetti, Maria Grazia Debalini, Carlo Di Pietrantonj

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 447 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 535 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 514 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 107 20%
Student > Master 95 18%
Researcher 62 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 8%
Other 31 6%
Other 83 16%
Unknown 115 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 202 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 4%
Psychology 21 4%
Social Sciences 20 4%
Other 86 16%
Unknown 132 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 632. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2024.
All research outputs
#37,993
of 26,784,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 13,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125
of 262,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,784,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.