↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery for rotator cuff tears

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
136 X users
facebook
17 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
561 Mendeley
Title
Surgery for rotator cuff tears
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013502
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teemu V Karjalainen, Nitin B Jain, Juuso Heikkinen, Renea V Johnston, Cristina M Page, Rachelle Buchbinder

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 561 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 561 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 79 14%
Student > Master 64 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 7%
Researcher 34 6%
Other 28 5%
Other 80 14%
Unknown 238 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 16%
Sports and Recreations 12 2%
Engineering 9 2%
Psychology 8 1%
Other 44 8%
Unknown 263 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#309,992
of 26,792,839 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#501
of 13,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,121
of 485,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,792,839 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.