↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery for rotator cuff tears

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
156 tweeters
facebook
17 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
501 Mendeley
Title
Surgery for rotator cuff tears
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013502
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teemu V Karjalainen, Nitin B Jain, Juuso Heikkinen, Renea V Johnston, Cristina M Page, Rachelle Buchbinder

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 156 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 501 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 501 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 76 15%
Student > Master 61 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 7%
Researcher 31 6%
Other 26 5%
Other 69 14%
Unknown 203 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 85 17%
Sports and Recreations 11 2%
Psychology 8 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 1%
Other 38 8%
Unknown 228 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#246,265
of 24,496,759 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#416
of 12,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,962
of 469,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,496,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.