↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery for rotator cuff tears

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
138 X users
facebook
17 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
550 Mendeley
Title
Surgery for rotator cuff tears
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013502
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teemu V Karjalainen, Nitin B Jain, Juuso Heikkinen, Renea V Johnston, Cristina M Page, Rachelle Buchbinder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 550 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 550 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 78 14%
Student > Master 64 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 7%
Researcher 34 6%
Other 27 5%
Other 78 14%
Unknown 231 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 17%
Sports and Recreations 12 2%
Engineering 9 2%
Psychology 8 1%
Other 41 7%
Unknown 257 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#299,485
of 26,320,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#483
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,012
of 484,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,320,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.