This new #serology study builds on existing data, as recently summarised by @cochranecollab @deeksj https://t.co/z0XYZM5of4
#COVID antibody testing was found to be specific but the sensitivity of tests was timing dependent. Very useful analysis from @cochranecollab
RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are antibody tests for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab system…
RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are antibody tests for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab system…
RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are antibody tests for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab system…
RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are antibody tests for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab system…
RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are antibody tests for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab system…
RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are antibody tests for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab system…
RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are antibody tests for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab system…
RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are antibody tests for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab system…
RT @PepePediatre: Tests de detección de anticuerpos frente a #SARS_CoV_2 . Hasta dónde puedesn afinar.
RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are antibody tests for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab system…
An interesting systematic review
Tests de detección de anticuerpos frente a #SARS_CoV_2 . Hasta dónde puedesn afinar.
Excellent résumé qui montre bien la sensibilité très variable dans le temps de la sérologie...
RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are antibody tests for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab system…
RT @cochranecollab: How accurate are antibody tests for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab system…
How accurate are antibody tests for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab systematic review: https://t.co/QTVoiTtDM5 Many thanks to @cg_coleman & @JenniferSpicer4 https://t.co/eMLUxTYa0a
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate antibody tests are for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab syste…
RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate antibody tests are for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab syste…
RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate antibody tests are for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab syste…
Excellent review: yet our accuracy is only 53.37%. @2019nCoVwatcher @COVID19Update @CochraneLibrary @cochranecollab
Antibody tests one week after first symptoms only detected 30% of people who had COVID-19. Accuracy increased in week 2 with 70% detected, and was highest in week 3 (more than 90% detected). Little evidence was available after week 3. https://t.co/biWFtLN8
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @cochranecollab: JUST PUBLISHED - Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/QTVoiTtDM…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate antibody tests are for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab syste…
RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate antibody tests are for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab syste…
RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate antibody tests are for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab syste…
RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate antibody tests are for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab syste…
RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate antibody tests are for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab syste…
RT @CochraneLibrary: How accurate antibody tests are for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab syste…
How accurate antibody tests are for detecting #COVID19? This visual abstract looks at the latest @cochranecollab systematic review: https://t.co/95qFRShBqV Many thanks to @cg_coleman & @JenniferSpicer4 https://t.co/VuV6AywBfn
Today's read: Covid antibody test characteristics. https://t.co/87b75Q6h9l and https://t.co/tCFxaGKd72 . Better performance than I expected.
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @Aller_MD: “Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with #SARS‐CoV‐2 Cochrane Systematic Review - Diagnostic” ht…
RT @Aller_MD: “Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with #SARS‐CoV‐2 Cochrane Systematic Review - Diagnostic” ht…
RT @Aller_MD: “Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with #SARS‐CoV‐2 Cochrane Systematic Review - Diagnostic” ht…
RT @Aller_MD: “Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with #SARS‐CoV‐2 Cochrane Systematic Review - Diagnostic” ht…
RT @Aller_MD: “Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with #SARS‐CoV‐2 Cochrane Systematic Review - Diagnostic” ht…
RT @Aller_MD: “Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with #SARS‐CoV‐2 Cochrane Systematic Review - Diagnostic” ht…
RT @Aller_MD: “Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with #SARS‐CoV‐2 Cochrane Systematic Review - Diagnostic” ht…
“Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with #SARS‐CoV‐2 Cochrane Systematic Review - Diagnostic” https://t.co/SBCHCO03Mn
RT @AlvarezMorenoC: Ayer @CochraneLibrary publica una revisión sistemática del uso de pruebas rápidas serologicas (IgM, IgG) en #COVID19.…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
Oof
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
All you wanted to know about antibody testing but didn't know whom to ask. Sterling communication. Something medics here and dare I say, medical journalists are not very good at. https://t.co/AWo4TNtnO1
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
@JungRichardG @RetractionWatch @MetaResearchSci @metaresearch You haven't read these 3 published systematic reviews? (1) https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc [all rated at high risk of bias], or this (2) https://t.co/nhb9vAxjev) [high risk of bias concerns], or (3) htt
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
Learn the COVID test numbers ... Thanks, Rebekah. Lets make sure every life lost to COVID-19 is counted. No more, no less. Our deceased deserve it.
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
@SasaSpasojevic This links to an article on antibody testing. If you're interested. :)
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
So my take is, Science doesn't lie! But even with expanded testing (Which is a good thing) A 8% false negative On people that tested negative is ALARMING
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
Something to think about!
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…