RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
RT @GeoRebekah: "If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would…
"If we test 1000 healthcare workers and 500 had COVID-19: - 464 would test positive for COVID-19. Of these, 7 (2%) would not have COVID-19 (false pos) - 537 people would test negative for COVID-19. Of these, 43 (8%) WOULD have COVID-19 (false neg)." htt
RT @jeffreyrobens: Regarding antibody testing for COVID-19, timing appears to be key. This post in the BMJ discusses a recent Cochrane sys…
RT @cochranecollab: JUST PUBLISHED - Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/QTVoiTtDM…
3/ Despite not having validation of serum antibody testing, it made sense to run the test given the persistence Sx if cough and fatigue. https://t.co/k0NFtRTxtg
RT @jeffreyrobens: Regarding antibody testing for COVID-19, timing appears to be key. This post in the BMJ discusses a recent Cochrane sys…
RT @jeffreyrobens: Regarding antibody testing for COVID-19, timing appears to be key. This post in the BMJ discusses a recent Cochrane sys…
Regarding antibody testing for COVID-19, timing appears to be key. This post in the BMJ discusses a recent Cochrane systematic review (https://t.co/jwV5wEWcyP) that evaluated 54 study cohorts from Asia, Europe, and the US found th…https://t.co/FQDY8PrUlS
What is the diagnostic accuracy of antibody tests for the detection of infection with the #COVID19 virus? https://t.co/YTkYp9j5Tp
RT @CochraneJapan: COVID19の抗体検査の診断精度レビューが出版されました! 感度は非常に低く診断には有用でなさそうでした。一方、症状発症後15日以上経過しての使用は既感染の検出に有用な可能性が高いです。ただ、抗体の上昇期間は不明であり、症状発症後35日を…
@CryptonoteSoci1 @matthew_d_green Source here https://t.co/TmhwuJBGLE
@ASlavitt At seven days, you're about to the point where an antibody test is more sensitive than a nucleic acid test🙁 https://t.co/40QhJYmBKr
“The design, execution and reporting of studies of the accuracy of COVID-19 tests requires considerable improvement.” https://t.co/mLw0eQ7JBZ https://t.co/ZvbC0V3y0u
@RuralOntWoman @GovCanHealth science says that test has problems. https://t.co/hdUfPSIeU3
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/PIunCrXlYb
RT @CochraneJapan: COVID19の抗体検査の診断精度レビューが出版されました! 感度は非常に低く診断には有用でなさそうでした。一方、症状発症後15日以上経過しての使用は既感染の検出に有用な可能性が高いです。ただ、抗体の上昇期間は不明であり、症状発症後35日を…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
Værd at læse ::🙂:: #COVID19dk
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
🔶 TRENDING ON PUBMED 🔶 Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/vAHIxQXtkb #MedTwitter #MedStudentTwitter #Covid19
RT @GSCollins: Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.…
Three #covid reviews: diagnostic & prognostic models (https://t.co/2bp1HHDDUc) [n=51], diagnostic antibody tests (https://t.co/nhb9vAxjev) [n=57], diagnostic serological tests (https://t.co/DmUNM6OLSB) [n=40]. All with the same conclusions - primary s
RT @Alicia82mad: Seguimos sin saber: test coronavirus, covid IgG, IgM, IgA,.... https://t.co/tXsmQpTRMW
Seguimos sin saber: test coronavirus, covid IgG, IgM, IgA,.... https://t.co/tXsmQpTRMW
@BallouxFrancois Saw this...Published 6/25/20 “antibody tests... We do not know how well the tests work for people who have milder disease or no symptoms, because the studies in the review were mainly done in people who were in hospital” https://t.co/a3GVa
RT @CochraneLibrary: JUST PUBLISHED - Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/95qFRShB…
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 - Deeks, JJ - 2020 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/BCq60XuWYf
@CT_Bergstrom @nanogenomic Cochrane advises against " We are therefore uncertain about the utility of these tests for seroprevalence surveys for public health management purposes." https://t.co/BfUe4DraQj
RT @PaulGlasziou: V helpful Tweetorial summary of new systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests: specificity 99%; sensitivity 80-90% -…
cochrane.org-Quelle est la précision diagnostique des tests sérologiques pour la détection de l'infection par le virus responsable de la COVID-19 ? https://t.co/p5Ie8wbMhK
RT @PaulGlasziou: V helpful Tweetorial summary of new systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests: specificity 99%; sensitivity 80-90% -…
RT @PaulGlasziou: V helpful Tweetorial summary of new systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests: specificity 99%; sensitivity 80-90% -…
Excelente hilo sobre las pruebas de detección de anticuerpos contra #SARSCoV2
RT @PaulGlasziou: V helpful Tweetorial summary of new systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests: specificity 99%; sensitivity 80-90% -…
RT @PaulGlasziou: V helpful Tweetorial summary of new systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests: specificity 99%; sensitivity 80-90% -…
RT @PaulGlasziou: V helpful Tweetorial summary of new systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests: specificity 99%; sensitivity 80-90% -…
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 - Deeks, JJ - 2020 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/EMQpR2YrcE
RT @ProfHschneider: Hier ist eine aktuelle Chochrane-Übersicht zur diagnostischen Genauigkeit von #Antikörpertests bei #COVID19 https://t.c…
RT @ShamilHaroon: SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests have low sensitivity before15 days (poor at ruling out disease early in the infection) but hig…
The @CochraneLibrary has a new systematic review on the "Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2". Go to 👉 https://t.co/E2GTkVpXab and get to know more about this topic. @EnfermagemPorto #COVID19 #review #infection #
RT @ProfHschneider: Hier ist eine aktuelle Chochrane-Übersicht zur diagnostischen Genauigkeit von #Antikörpertests bei #COVID19 https://t.c…
RT @ProfHschneider: Hier ist eine aktuelle Chochrane-Übersicht zur diagnostischen Genauigkeit von #Antikörpertests bei #COVID19 https://t.c…
RT @ProfHschneider: Hier ist eine aktuelle Chochrane-Übersicht zur diagnostischen Genauigkeit von #Antikörpertests bei #COVID19 https://t.c…
RT @ProfHschneider: Hier ist eine aktuelle Chochrane-Übersicht zur diagnostischen Genauigkeit von #Antikörpertests bei #COVID19 https://t.c…
RT @cochranecollab: #COVID19 | Led by Professor Jon Deeks @deeksj and @Cochrane_IDG this @CochraneLibrary review analysed worldwide data to…
RT @destmauricemd: Cochrane Rev of #COVID19 serology "The sensitivity of Ab tests is too low in the 1st week since symptom onset to have a…
RT @cochranecollab: JUST PUBLISHED - Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/QTVoiTtDM…
RT @ShamilHaroon: SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests have low sensitivity before15 days (poor at ruling out disease early in the infection) but hig…
SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests have low sensitivity before15 days (poor at ruling out disease early in the infection) but high specificity (good at ruling in infection). Studies generally biased and data for most commercial assays missing. #COVIDJournalClub ht
RT @ocosava: Por lo tanto.... https://t.co/GqhUQsobLW
Mucho se ha hablado de los test rápidos para COVID-19. Cada vez hay más y más publicidad, se venden en todos lados!!!. Pero, ¿qué sabemos realmente de estas pruebas diagnósticas? Una revisión sistemática se publicó hace unos días: https://t.co/MuXrHCrdze
'Antibody tests one week after first symptoms only detected 30% of people who had COVID‐19. Accuracy... was highest in week 3... Tests gave false positive results in 2% of those without COVID‐19' https://t.co/McC6GzyT7t
RT @gmanacosta: Aquí un artículo científico excelente , que evidencia la poca “utilidad” de las pruebas rápidas. https://t.co/DI9uNJgYB9 Ad…
RT @ernestob: ¿Cuál es la precisión dca. de Ac para infección x COVID19?[Cochrane]➔Sensib ⇊baja en 1ª sem, dudoso papel principal en dco, s…
RT @AlvarezMorenoC: Ayer @CochraneLibrary publica una revisión sistemática del uso de pruebas rápidas serologicas (IgM, IgG) en #COVID19.…
RT @CochraneJapan: COVID19の抗体検査の診断精度レビューが出版されました! 感度は非常に低く診断には有用でなさそうでした。一方、症状発症後15日以上経過しての使用は既感染の検出に有用な可能性が高いです。ただ、抗体の上昇期間は不明であり、症状発症後35日を…
RT @covid19maskjp: COVID-19ウイルスへの感染を検出するための抗体検査の診断精度は? https://t.co/zxgSjLS5Gx
Puede que te resulte "agotador" darle leída a esta revisión, imagina como es para todos y cada uno de los que estamos en turno esperando, deseando que tengamos esa "leve mejoría"... Por los tuyos, por los míos Quédate en casa... https://t.co/fCOEl3fERC
RT @AlvarezMorenoC: Ayer @CochraneLibrary publica una revisión sistemática del uso de pruebas rápidas serologicas (IgM, IgG) en #COVID19.…
RT @CochraneLibrary: #COVID19 | Led by Professor Jon Deeks @deeksj and @Cochrane_IDG this @CochraneLibrary review analysed worldwide data t…
RT @CochraneLibrary: #COVID19 | Led by Professor Jon Deeks @deeksj and @Cochrane_IDG this @CochraneLibrary review analysed worldwide data t…
RT @AlvarezMorenoC: Ayer @CochraneLibrary publica una revisión sistemática del uso de pruebas rápidas serologicas (IgM, IgG) en #COVID19.…
RT @CochraneLibrary: #COVID19 | Led by Professor Jon Deeks @deeksj and @Cochrane_IDG this @CochraneLibrary review analysed worldwide data t…
RT @CochraneLibrary: #COVID19 | Led by Professor Jon Deeks @deeksj and @Cochrane_IDG this @CochraneLibrary review analysed worldwide data t…
RT @CochraneLibrary: #COVID19 | Led by Professor Jon Deeks @deeksj and @Cochrane_IDG this @CochraneLibrary review analysed worldwide data t…
#COVID19 | Led by Professor Jon Deeks @deeksj and @Cochrane_IDG this @CochraneLibrary review analysed worldwide data to examine the accuracy of #antibody tests for COVID-19. Data shows that the timing of testing is critical. https://t.co/95qFRShBqV https:
Los estudios serológicos infraestiman la prevalencia real de sujetos que han pasado infección por SARS-Cov2. https://t.co/q5mew6IGY6
RT @cochranecollab: #COVID19 | Led by Professor Jon Deeks @deeksj and @Cochrane_IDG this @CochraneLibrary review analysed worldwide data to…
RT @CochraneLibrary: JUST PUBLISHED - Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 https://t.co/95qFRShB…
Quelle est la précision diagnostique des #tests_sérologiques pour la détection de l'infection par le virus responsable de la #COVID_19 ? : https://t.co/s5ddcIIlZB
#AyudaBilioteca Antibody Tests for Identification of Current and Past Infection With SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/MCQsxULAWX
Very good insights on COVID19 antibody tests....
RT @Anibal_v_v: Pruebas de IgG/IgM para COVID-19 tuvieron una sensibilidad (verdaderos positivos) del 30% durante 1 a 7 días, 72% por 8 a 1…
RT @CochraneJapan: COVID-19ウイルスへの感染を検出するための抗体検査の診断精度は? https://t.co/5hKxBaMDUs