The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Exercise interventions on health‐related quality of life for people with cancer during active treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008465.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shiraz I Mishra, Roberta W Scherer, Claire Snyder, Paula M Geigle, Debra R Berlanstein, Ozlem Topaloglu |
| Abstract |
People with cancer undergoing active treatment experience numerous disease- and treatment-related adverse outcomes and poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Exercise interventions are hypothesized to alleviate these adverse outcomes. HRQoL and its domains are important measures of cancer survivorship, both during and after the end of active treatment for cancer. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| Australia | 3 | 7% |
| Norway | 3 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 78% |
| Scientists | 6 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 994 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 976 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 176 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 111 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 110 | 11% |
| Researcher | 91 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 68 | 7% |
| Other | 173 | 17% |
| Unknown | 265 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 254 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 133 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 87 | 9% |
| Psychology | 76 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 3% |
| Other | 110 | 11% |
| Unknown | 304 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2024.
All research outputs
#253,122
of 26,362,847 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#411
of 13,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,173
of 188,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,362,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.