The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 345 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Rapid, point‐of‐care antigen and molecular‐based tests for diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013705 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Ada Adriano, Sarah Berhane, Clare Davenport, Sabine Dittrich, Devy Emperador, Yemisi Takwoingi, Jane Cunningham, Sophie Beese, Janine Dretzke, Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Isobel M Harris, Malcolm J Price, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Lotty Hooft, Mariska MG Leeflang, René Spijker, Ann Van den Bruel, Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 5% |
| Spain | 17 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 4% |
| Mexico | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| Nepal | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Unknown | 240 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 236 | 68% |
| Scientists | 58 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 771 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 771 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 113 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 95 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 9% |
| Other | 56 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 5% |
| Other | 122 | 16% |
| Unknown | 275 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 179 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 80 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 31 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 3% |
| Other | 107 | 14% |
| Unknown | 314 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 437. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#69,329
of 26,562,579 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 13,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,319
of 429,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,562,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.