The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Taxation of the fat content of foods for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012415.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan K Lhachimi, Frank Pega, Thomas L Heise, Candida Fenton, Gerald Gartlehner, Ursula Griebler, Isolde Sommer, Manuela Bombana, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| India | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 21% |
| Scientists | 7 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 450 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 11% |
| Researcher | 45 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 67 | 15% |
| Unknown | 189 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 34 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 55 | 12% |
| Unknown | 207 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#623,155
of 26,383,299 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,053
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,768
of 430,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.