↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 13,211)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
685 Mendeley
Title
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006207.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Jefferson, Chris B Del Mar, Liz Dooley, Eliana Ferroni, Lubna A Al-Ansary, Ghada A Bawazeer, Mieke L van Driel, Mark A Jones, Sarah Thorning, Elaine M Beller, Justin Clark, Tammy C Hoffmann, Paul P Glasziou, John M Conly

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16,680 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 685 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 685 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 87 13%
Researcher 72 11%
Student > Bachelor 64 9%
Other 39 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 5%
Other 99 14%
Unknown 288 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 162 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 2%
Psychology 14 2%
Other 94 14%
Unknown 314 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8066. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2024.
All research outputs
#311
of 26,323,740 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27
of 532,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,323,740 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.