@vrijezangvogel @JosetteSchoenma @JohnDoomen1 @AlmaTostmann @Rovers_Chantal @ministerVWS Voor de pandemie wisten we al dat mondkapjes niet helpen tegen luchtwegvirussen, ze helpen niet eens tegen post-operatieve wondinfecties maar sinds deze heeft heeft Co
RT @drmikehart: An updated Cochrane review concluded that masks do not provide protection against respiratory viruses. "randomised trials…
RT @shikama_kcmc: 2020年前半まではマスクと呼吸器系ウイルスに関するロクなデータがなかったというコクランレビュー。 世界中でシャカリキに集めた結果がこれから次々レビューされることでしょう。 Physical interventions to interru…
RT @shikama_kcmc: 2020年前半まではマスクと呼吸器系ウイルスに関するロクなデータがなかったというコクランレビュー。 世界中でシャカリキに集めた結果がこれから次々レビューされることでしょう。 Physical interventions to interru…
2020年前半まではマスクと呼吸器系ウイルスに関するロクなデータがなかったというコクランレビュー。 世界中でシャカリキに集めた結果がこれから次々レビューされることでしょう。 Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/4Lrgpn20fT
マスクのみやん。手洗いとかの記事ではない。嫌な予感がするな。煽動の臭い。
RT @piyoketa: コクランレビュー、マジか。医学的エビデンスとしては最高峰だと思っているのだが、、、 https://t.co/newJjkOLMs
医療従事者の作業でのN95とサージカルマスクにおいても有意差がなかった。
コクランレビュー、マジか。医学的エビデンスとしては最高峰だと思っているのだが、、、 https://t.co/newJjkOLMs
RT @conch_222: @MNHR_Labo 一般人は鼻マスクとかゆるゆるとか微妙なケースが多いからもあるでしょ。 医療従事者のマスクは依然有効なんだし。 手指の消毒の有効性を言わないで 反マスクだけ嬉しそうな医師ってなんか微妙…。 今後また新しい研究結果が出てもあなた…
RT @akadaijiro: 2020/11/20 マスクの有効性はみられない https://t.co/qg90OZcQMs 一ヶ月後 2020/12/19 マスクは感染を効果的に防ぐ https://t.co/KylRkct5dD 今回 2023/01/30 マスクはガイ…
@akadaijiro え？コクランは2020年から一貫してますけど？ なぜならrctで結果がでないから です https://t.co/LgpcGtcTyD
RT @conch_222: @MNHR_Labo 一般人は鼻マスクとかゆるゆるとか微妙なケースが多いからもあるでしょ。 医療従事者のマスクは依然有効なんだし。 手指の消毒の有効性を言わないで 反マスクだけ嬉しそうな医師ってなんか微妙…。 今後また新しい研究結果が出てもあなた…
RT @akadaijiro: 2020/11/20 マスクの有効性はみられない https://t.co/qg90OZcQMs 一ヶ月後 2020/12/19 マスクは感染を効果的に防ぐ https://t.co/KylRkct5dD 今回 2023/01/30 マスクはガイ…
@BryanNehman You just like a Tweet about this. Can't believe this is the first you have heard of this. https://t.co/LQGPJUwzQM
RT @akadaijiro: 2020/11/20 マスクの有効性はみられない https://t.co/qg90OZcQMs 一ヶ月後 2020/12/19 マスクは感染を効果的に防ぐ https://t.co/KylRkct5dD 今回 2023/01/30 マスクはガイ…
RT @akadaijiro: 2020/11/20 マスクの有効性はみられない https://t.co/qg90OZcQMs 一ヶ月後 2020/12/19 マスクは感染を効果的に防ぐ https://t.co/KylRkct5dD 今回 2023/01/30 マスクはガイ…
RT @EmilyTVproducer: Masks make "little or no difference." Same goes for N95s. https://t.co/zmGHhuwvuK Now: get out of my face. And stay ou…
RT @EmilyTVproducer: Masks make "little or no difference." Same goes for N95s. https://t.co/zmGHhuwvuK Now: get out of my face. And stay ou…
RT @drmikehart: An updated Cochrane review concluded that masks do not provide protection against respiratory viruses. "randomised trials…
RT @drmikehart: An updated Cochrane review concluded that masks do not provide protection against respiratory viruses. "randomised trials…
RT @drmikehart: An updated Cochrane review concluded that masks do not provide protection against respiratory viruses. "randomised trials…
RT @drmikehart: An updated Cochrane review concluded that masks do not provide protection against respiratory viruses. "randomised trials…
RT @drmikehart: An updated Cochrane review concluded that masks do not provide protection against respiratory viruses. "randomised trials…
RT @drmikehart: An updated Cochrane review concluded that masks do not provide protection against respiratory viruses. "randomised trials…
RT @drmikehart: An updated Cochrane review concluded that masks do not provide protection against respiratory viruses. "randomised trials…
RT @drmikehart: An updated Cochrane review concluded that masks do not provide protection against respiratory viruses. "randomised trials…
An updated Cochrane review concluded that masks do not provide protection against respiratory viruses. "randomised trials did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks during seasonal influenza." htt
@KC4Gr8NESS In the case of being sent nudes from the Admiral, proper mask wearing would be to cover the eyes! Oh, latest study that masks don't work - except as eye covers. https://t.co/n5ZANdJ5tD
@MNHR_Labo 一般人は鼻マスクとかゆるゆるとか微妙なケースが多いからもあるでしょ。 医療従事者のマスクは依然有効なんだし。 手指の消毒の有効性を言わないで 反マスクだけ嬉しそうな医師ってなんか微妙…。 今後また新しい研究結果が出てもあなたがスルーしないといいんですけど。 https://t.co/vjCApwRnON
RT @LoveHamma9: @carlheneghan @FatEmperor Shocking. No change. https://t.co/39Ablc8FU2
2020/11/20 マスクの有効性はみられない https://t.co/qg90OZcQMs 一ヶ月後 2020/12/19 マスクは感染を効果的に防ぐ https://t.co/KylRkct5dD 今回 2023/01/30 マスクはガイダンスに沿って着用していない場合効果がみられない 数週間後には新しい症例対照研究の系統的レビューが発表されるはず
@borghi_claudio Aggiornamenti... https://t.co/YcKtfhBbXi
Interventi fisici per interrompere o ridurre la diffusione dei virus respiratori. https://t.co/5qqsPfNBSg https://t.co/sdvbjmJZj2
@1goodtern Liars like the Cochrane library https://t.co/6KlYRHoue6
Masks make "little or no difference." Same goes for N95s. https://t.co/zmGHhuwvuK Now: get out of my face. And stay out of my face, bloodstream, food supply, and brain. I will NOT comply. I WILL survive without convenience.
@JReinerMD It’s really not clear. Community masking does not spread to produce robust (really any) benefit. https://t.co/RiHILg49ul
RT @Kajtek13: @PiotrWitczak_ @cochranecollab @MZ_GOV_PL Czego Wam @PiotrWitczak_ nie ujawni? Tego, ze to wynik wymieszanych prac a wiec, z…
RT @Kajtek13: @PiotrWitczak_ @cochranecollab @MZ_GOV_PL Czego Wam @PiotrWitczak_ nie ujawni? Tego, ze to wynik wymieszanych prac a wiec, z…
@PiotrWitczak_ @cochranecollab @MZ_GOV_PL Pan Witczak widzę dalej w formie https://t.co/gaOcoY9EJf
@zwergldoc "We are uncertain whether wearing masks or N95/P2 respirators helps to slow the spread of respiratory viruses based on the studies we assessed." Das stand wortwörtlich genauso auch schon in der review vom November 2020 https://t.co/puwZDBYxke
@WaldemarWu @PiotrWitczak_ @cochranecollab @MZ_GOV_PL Wyjdź mu z dupy xD https://t.co/xOIuYcPQIL
RT @Kajtek13: @PiotrWitczak_ @cochranecollab @MZ_GOV_PL Czego Wam @PiotrWitczak_ nie ujawni? Tego, ze to wynik wymieszanych prac a wiec, z…
@PiotrWitczak_ @cochranecollab @MZ_GOV_PL Czego Wam @PiotrWitczak_ nie ujawni? Tego, ze to wynik wymieszanych prac a wiec, ze maski nie działają we wszystkich zastosowaniach ale działają w niektórych i ze Cochrane dalej zaleca noszenie masek. Tutaj cala a
RT @LoveHamma9: @carlheneghan @FatEmperor Shocking. No change. https://t.co/39Ablc8FU2
@DrScheuch Thema Masken nur um 2 RCTs erweitert wurde, die eigentlich jeder hätte auf dem Schirm haben müssen der sich halbwegs mit dem Thema beschäftigt). Kannten sie den cochrane review vorher einfach nicht oder wie kam es zu dieser falschen Erwartung? (
「飛沫感染などほぼ起きない」 本当にそうなら良いですね😇 人の唾液は元から雑菌まみれで血が滲む強さで噛まれたら病院行き。喋ればその飛沫がばら撒かれるわけですが…。
@carlheneghan @FatEmperor Shocking. No change. https://t.co/39Ablc8FU2
RT @_S__L_: @freedom_day_now Ich hätte da noch bessere Belege für die Unwirksamkeit von Masken: Cochrane-Metaanalyse (mit RCTs aus Influenz…
@Nopanaden Los meta-análisis sobre la nula o mínima protección de masks no sirven, pero lo que vd aporta, una fritanga cientifista más para promover los pinchazos, eso es LaEvidencia definitiva. https://t.co/HF1w19Oc2g
RT @LMBooster: Rojo, 🟥certezas bajas🟥. Amarillo, 🟨certezas moderadas🟨 Pero venga a usar las 😷 en farmacias💊 y transporte🚌 https://t.co/7G…
@matubarashiminn @Canned_Dinosaur あなたがいくら感想を述べても世界最高峰のコクランによるエビデンスでも効果は見られませんよ？ なぜなら飛沫感染などほぼおきないからです https://t.co/LgpcGtcTyD https://t.co/RjTfbpQHqM
And…scene. Lmfao Score: Lamar - 6 Dirt Wall - 0000000000
@LamarVannoy11 @TheEliKlein @mkarolian Or, perhaps, you were somehow unaware of the Cochrane Library meta analysis of 20 RCTs which found "moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference" wrt to the flu. https://t.co/
@VPrasadMDMPH There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask Harms were rarely measured and poorly reported. https://t.co/ecsl
@ric09160767 @TheEliKlein Looks like the link is down but here it is. If you search the site you should find the review. https://t.co/e78GAvU4v0
RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…
@sascha71654615 @ProfRambazamba @DoHeinerultras @anti_alarmist_ Cochrane Systematic Review https://t.co/puwZDBYxke "the pooled results of randomised trials did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks
@captain_stavros @GeorgeMonbiot Anyone who starts a discussion with Bollocks is unlikely to have an open mind. Here is one meta study that shows masks don’t stop transmission https://t.co/2vPZRx1AcA
@Garcio72 Búscame con sólo meta-análisis que avale que la mascarilla reduce la infección por virus respiratorios en entornos no controlados. 1 solo Rafa. Yo aquí te pongo 3 que dicen lo contrario, que su uso no marca una diferencia significativa con su n
@healthbyjames Shut up and act. "There is low certainty evidence from nine trials (3507 participants) that wearing a mask may make little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI) compared to not wearing a mask " https://t.co/LQGPJUw2
@Bob_Wachter Masking religion. Never mind the data. The best evidence shows that masks and N95 are very poor in preventing viral transmission: Pre-COVID: https://t.co/Y8C6ENzF9U… COVID era: https://t.co/JP5B7XoKZx… https://t.co/ZO3Y0cGPov… N95: https://t
@nzap9290 @yamikawadays @saakun1004 @PDTH3ahqRCrVri7 @jbx_pw 結果がバラバラ？毎回有意差がでないで安定してますよ？ https://t.co/LgpcGtcTyD コクランレビューでも マスク効果への信頼度は中程度 低くないですよ？ https://t.co/7RzAV3w9AN
RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…
マスクに効果がないとかwww効果あるのだがwwwww周回遅れにもほどがあるwwww無知で情弱にもほどがあるwwwwww さすが分数の計算も出来ないだけあるwww小学生からやりなおせ
@saakun1004 @yamikawadays @PDTH3ahqRCrVri7 @jbx_pw マスクに効果がないし、インフル以下の感染症へマスクなんていらないから外せ と言っているのですが？ あなたも含めて無知ですよね？ https://t.co/LgpcGtcTyD 無知であること以外になにが？ https://t.co/2H911QsNXk
@clgschoen @MiguelNicolelis @nesimachado @lucashistoria13 @GustavoM2014 @AndreJanonesAdv Evidências da melhor qualidade possível mostram que máscaras NÃO evitam a transmissão viral. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/rN22VyrFIo Era Covidus: https://t.co/r4QgWMNcb4 ht
@beattrice_ Evidências da melhor qualidade possível mostram que máscaras NÃO evitam a transmissão viral. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/rN22VyrFIo Era Covidus: https://t.co/r4QgWMNcb4 https://t.co/2VsYj1sqnh N95: https://t.co/xRpzQ43M6Q Não é RCT, mas é de quem v
@OGNNBrasil Evidências da melhor qualidade possível mostram que máscaras NÃO evitam a transmissão viral. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/rN22VyrFIo Era Covidus: https://t.co/r4QgWMNcb4 https://t.co/2VsYj1sqnh N95: https://t.co/xRpzQ43M6Q Não é RCT, mas é de quem v
Evidências da melhor qualidade possível mostram que máscaras NÃO evitam a transmissão viral. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/rN22VyrFIo Era Covidus: https://t.co/r4QgWMNcb4 https://t.co/2VsYj1sqnh N95: https://t.co/xRpzQ43M6Q Não é RCT, mas é de quem vos fala: htt
@UOLNoticias Evidências da melhor qualidade possível mostram que máscaras NÃO evitam a transmissão viral. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/rN22VyrFIo Era Covidus: https://t.co/r4QgWMNcb4 https://t.co/2VsYj1sqnh N95: https://t.co/xRpzQ43M6Q Não é RCT, mas é de quem
@revistaoeste Evidências da melhor qualidade possível mostram que máscaras não evitam a transmissão viral. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/rN22VyrFIo Era Covidus: https://t.co/r4QgWMNcb4 https://t.co/2VsYj1sqnh N95: https://t.co/xRpzQ43M6Q Não é RCT, mas é de quem
@UllmannMdB Es isi eine Aberglaube, dass die Maske vor respiratorischen Infektionen schützt. Jedem steht jedoch frei, das Amulett zu tragen. https://t.co/a8LMGVL8jA
RT @ivaningrad: Otro meta-análisis de RCTs: https://t.co/MiNorxqsHw https://t.co/Ndc8TsNZeV
https://t.co/e8yPlSFWiW コロナ以前の実験結果によるマスク効果のメタアナリシス。論文内容はマスクに限らず全ての介入の効果を解析している。 手指衛生以外は効果が確認できなかったが、全ての結果で正確性が低～中程度となっていてこれをコロナ対策に一般化できない。もっとちゃんとした試験をしろ
@tonden2 @lullymiura 散々効果無しというエビデンスが積み上がってましたがね。 https://t.co/rNohO1F2Rs
@LeastIThoughtSo @Mon4Kooyong All right what about this Cochrane analysis. It is pre 2019 and so pre politicization of masks. it shows only very marginal protection with N95 in a setting where trained staff are in a room with an infectious person. https://
RT @ivaningrad: Otro meta-análisis de RCTs: https://t.co/MiNorxqsHw https://t.co/Ndc8TsNZeV
@Coys0527 @mygiddyauntie @charliesmithvcr @sameo416 It doesn't save anyone's life. A meta-analysis found "No reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of masks." Sorry, but making yourself look like a psycho for no reason is not the intelligent
(8/170) not wearing a mask” Study article: https://t.co/VwRWa8aPKH
@mariavhawkins @DocJeffD The number #1 NPI (other than avoiding all human contact) is Hand Hygiene, and it only helps reduce cases by 16% on average. Masks don't have any measure efficacy in RCTs, so leaving the off is A-OK. https://t.co/uUKiQPTsOd
@MaeLovesRock @space_florida @Hold2LLC @luckytran Paddle aside, I have a minor in statistics, so I am well-qualified to read/interpret studies. RCTs = High-Quality Medical Evidence Meta-analyses of RCTs = Highest Quality Not one RCT shows mask make diff