| Title |
Random drug and alcohol testing for preventing injury in workers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012921.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charl Els, Tanya D Jackson, Mathew T Milen, Diane Kunyk, Graeme Wyatt, Daniel Sowah, Reidar Hagtvedt, Danika Deibert, Sebastian Straube |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 43% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 48 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,037,015
of 24,512,028 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,408
of 12,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,327
of 513,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,512,028 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.