Does workplace random drug and alcohol testing (RDAT) effectively prevent injuries and improve non-injury outcomes? The debate continues. Learn why: https://t.co/kKQK4xLtp0
Exploring the effectiveness of random drug and alcohol testing (RDAT) in preventing workplace injuries reveals mixed outcomes. While aimed at reducing accidents, a rtecent comprehensive review highlights the need for further research. https://t.co/u9cndeA5
Despite its potential importance, the single eligible study on RDAT left several questions unanswered regarding the testing's impact on different safety outcomes. Find out more: https://t.co/kKQK4xLtp0
Recent research reveals a serious lack of studies on workplace RDAT's effectiveness, with only one eligible study focusing on the US aviation industry. Read more: https://t.co/kKQK4xLtp0
@homerixy32 @carlquintanilla There is little to no evidence that drug testing improves safety in the workplace. https://t.co/9Z1mhHSeUo https://t.co/wOelFRXGqb
無作為の薬物やアルコール検査が労働者の災害を防げるか? | Cochrane https://t.co/tTVycuEmDV
抑止効果としてのアンコールチェックか
RT @CochraneJapan: 無作為の薬物やアルコール検査が労働者の災害を防げるか? https://t.co/QDY9WTtCKd
RT @CochraneJapan: 無作為の薬物やアルコール検査が労働者の災害を防げるか? https://t.co/QDY9WTtCKd
RT @CochraneJapan: 無作為の薬物やアルコール検査が労働者の災害を防げるか? https://t.co/QDY9WTtCKd
無作為の薬物やアルコール検査が労働者の災害を防げるか? https://t.co/QDY9WTtCKd