↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing lower limb soft-tissue running injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
26 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
571 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for preventing lower limb soft-tissue running injuries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001256.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon S Yeung, Ella W Yeung, Lesley D Gillespie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 571 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 545 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 120 21%
Student > Bachelor 96 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 11%
Researcher 52 9%
Student > Postgraduate 45 8%
Other 125 22%
Unknown 71 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 206 36%
Sports and Recreations 98 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 79 14%
Social Sciences 19 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 3%
Other 51 9%
Unknown 99 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#328,064
of 17,944,974 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#695
of 11,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,500
of 320,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,944,974 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.