↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing lower limb soft‐tissue running injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
24 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
677 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for preventing lower limb soft‐tissue running injuries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001256.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon S Yeung, Ella W Yeung, Lesley D Gillespie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 677 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 653 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 126 19%
Student > Bachelor 101 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 9%
Researcher 60 9%
Student > Postgraduate 46 7%
Other 134 20%
Unknown 146 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 211 31%
Sports and Recreations 102 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 13%
Social Sciences 19 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 3%
Other 54 8%
Unknown 181 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
#589,103
of 26,327,128 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#982
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,057
of 130,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,327,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.