↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing lower limb soft‐tissue running injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
25 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
674 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for preventing lower limb soft‐tissue running injuries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001256.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon S Yeung, Ella W Yeung, Lesley D Gillespie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 674 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 650 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 125 19%
Student > Bachelor 100 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 9%
Researcher 60 9%
Student > Postgraduate 46 7%
Other 136 20%
Unknown 143 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 211 31%
Sports and Recreations 101 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 90 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 3%
Social Sciences 19 3%
Other 55 8%
Unknown 179 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
#552,675
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#978
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,964
of 127,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.