↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing lower limb soft‐tissue running injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
26 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
681 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for preventing lower limb soft‐tissue running injuries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001256.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon S Yeung, Ella W Yeung, Lesley D Gillespie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 681 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 657 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 125 18%
Student > Bachelor 100 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 10%
Researcher 59 9%
Student > Postgraduate 46 7%
Other 147 22%
Unknown 139 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 211 31%
Sports and Recreations 101 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 89 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 3%
Social Sciences 19 3%
Other 68 10%
Unknown 174 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
#542,987
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#963
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,925
of 127,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.