↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing lower limb soft-tissue running injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
25 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
629 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for preventing lower limb soft-tissue running injuries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001256.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon S Yeung, Ella W Yeung, Lesley D Gillespie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 629 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 605 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 121 19%
Student > Bachelor 103 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 10%
Researcher 56 9%
Student > Postgraduate 46 7%
Other 130 21%
Unknown 110 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 205 33%
Sports and Recreations 99 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 14%
Social Sciences 19 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Other 54 9%
Unknown 143 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
#442,763
of 22,509,254 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#822
of 12,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,364
of 101,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,509,254 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.