RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
I’ve cited this over a dozen times.
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
RT @MartyMakary: Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being cr…
Masking did nothing for the 276,000 participants in randomized trials or cluster RCTs. The Cochrane review is now being criticized simply because some people do not like the results--but that's not how science works. 1/2 https://t.co/XV9lMstozp
@SenatorBraun Delete this shit and hire at least one aide that's scientifically literate. https://t.co/ff6chTOyY9 https://t.co/ClrtEpw4Pr
@RockyMtHigh @RepKenBuck Secondly, you seem to believe the narrative that Masks prevent or slow the spread of C19. A dozen scientists from around the world conducted a massive metastudy and recently released the results. Guess what they found? https://t.c
@markrobinsonNC Thank you. Masks don't work, so it's evil to mask kids. https://t.co/Xoz34r1NB2
@JenniferPolli10 @RepKenBuck "The use of a N95/P2 respirators compared to medical/surgical masks probably makes little or no difference..." https://t.co/JfwZQzRQAv
@JenniferPolli10 @RepKenBuck "Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of (ILI)/COVID‐19 like illness compared to not wearing masks..." https://t.co/JfwZQzRQAv
@TheChefsGardens You don't even know what we are talking about? 🤦♂️ https://t.co/tA4BPXg1KQ
@PULIE2011 This disclaimer is not on the study. It's a press release or something. Here's the study and the disclaimer is not present. https://t.co/M1oC8XfN3X
Here’s the science to support NOT wearing masks: Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - Jefferson, T - 2023 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/QekhlFprJr
Masks done work, study: Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - Jefferson, T - 2023 | Cochrane Library “Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like …” ht
Wearing masks in public for a virus is merely a way to show compliance to a Government out of control, to show submission. Actual science - not Govt paid shills - shows little evidence masks do anything but collect dirt. #mask #Covid #Covid19 https://t.co
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - Jefferson, T - 2023 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/1p4nh5Sj6i https://t.co/UkOpAA8tel
Per the study that this radio host is citing, masking really does shit to prevent COVID even when taking into account KN95 and N95s or at least it did through the major part of the pandemic.
@DonaldJTrumpJr "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" https://t.co/FE0hDVhP22
RT @mo62707719: @MHLWitter 昔から言われていたことですが、コクランレビューにて、改めてマスクにはなんら効果が無いことが、掲載されました 「但し書き」は必要ありません 咳が出る人は着けてそれ以外は着けない そもそも「マスクに感染予防効果」が有るので…
@PULIE2011 You gave me one person's opinion with no study or data. Here is the most definitive study of studies for masking. It found no significant reduction. Excerpt below:: Read it. https://t.co/fzJTz7jKmI https://t.co/eo2v6T8385
RT @JefferysSteven: @lincolnmjay @realmonsanto You should explain to those folks that: 1. Zero gold standard studies (RCTs) support maskin…
Peer-reviewed “The pooled results of RCTs did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks. There were no clear differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators..
@DrEricDing @JoeBiden What a bunch of clowns you are. Tom Jefferson an epidemiologist from Oxford who led a comprehensive investigation into the efficacy of masks found:- "there is just no evidence that they make any difference" The cat is out of the bag!
@EdKrassen Masks are pointless here's the science https://t.co/oczekZrecL
Masks Don't Work. Period. 78 Randomized Controlled Trials. Hundreds of thousands of patients. Surgical masks and N95 masks both did not prevent spread of influenza-like virus or covid...and didn't prevent catching these viruses. https://t.co/OSRLoMK
@bennyjohnson Soap not masks - Wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness/COVID‐like illness. But, "hand hygiene interventions" caused a 14% relative reduction. https://t.co/7AqnKpnKM9
RT @4Parrhesia: @ClayTravis Soap not masks - Wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness/C…
N95 masks only filters particle size 0.5 microns and bigger. The covid virus is 0.06 microns which is much smaller than 0.5. Give a good sneeze or speak and you'll blow the covid virus right through that mask. No protection what so ever. Follow the science
@JeromeAdamsMD N95 masks only filters particle size 0.5 microns and bigger. The covid virus is 0.06 microns which is much smaller than 0.5. Give a good sneeze or speak and you'll blow the covid virus right through that mask. No protection what so ever. Fol
@MainePolicy @TheMaineWire N95 masks only filters particle size 0.5 microns and bigger. The covid virus is 0.06 microns which is much smaller than 0.5. Give a good sneeze or speak and you'll blow the covid virus right through that mask. No protection what
@The_Trump_Train N95 masks only filters particle size 0.5 microns and bigger. The covid virus is 0.06 microns which is much smaller than 0.5. Give a good sneeze or speak and you'll blow the covid virus right through that mask. No protection what so ever. F
@aliswisel @1BethDutton @libsoftiktok heres a comprehensive review actually https://t.co/JFUhL6lxHS
RT @JefferysSteven: @lincolnmjay @realmonsanto You should explain to those folks that: 1. Zero gold standard studies (RCTs) support maskin…
@ClayTravis Soap not masks - Wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness/COVID‐like illness. But, "hand hygiene interventions" caused a 14% relative reduction. https://t.co/3MiC64Qh2O
@WHO @DrTedros Before all the mask-ites start chiming in with their uninformed, opinionated drivel... https://t.co/3Zg5coIfDz https://t.co/J5dAcrGv6N
@mehdirhasan @MehdiHasanShow hey expert, because of your ridiculous comments about school lockdowns, explain this. https://t.co/7HwsNzLsF1
@TheCoryLahey It's also the opinion of the top reviewers of evidenced based medicine in the world. https://t.co/op12Tjs7ia
@acoyne Short sighted. One day they might invent a mask that makes a difference. In the meantime it's just silly to waste money on them. https://t.co/GfOSrt3UKB
@stillgray N95 masks only filters particle size 0.5 microns and bigger. The covid virus is 0.06 microns which is much smaller than 0.5. Give a good sneeze or speak and you'll blow the covid virus right through that mask. No protection what so ever. Follow
@JeromeAdamsMD @BlueObserverA The Cochrane Review of multiple studies showed masks have little to no effect in preventing COVID transmission or infection. https://t.co/u1wYNtRlLk
@ChrisWickNews N95 masks only filters particle size 0.5 microns and bigger. The covid virus is 0.06 microns which is much smaller than 0.5. Give a good sneeze or speak and you'll blow the covid virus right through that mask. No protection what so ever. Fol
N95 masks only filters particle size 0.5 microns and bigger. The covid virus is 0.06 microns which is much smaller than 0.5. Give a good sneeze or speak and you'll blow the covid virus right through that mask. No protection what so ever. Follow the science
@DrEricDing @JoeBiden N95 masks only filters particle size 0.5 microns and bigger. The covid virus is 0.06 microns which is much smaller than 0.5. Give a good sneeze or speak and you'll blow the covid virus right through that mask. No protection what so ev
@TimRunsHisMouth N95 masks only filters particle size 0.5 microns and bigger. The covid virus is 0.06 microns which is much smaller than 0.5. Give a good sneeze or speak and you'll blow the covid virus right through that mask. No protection what so ever. F
@luckytran N95 masks only filters particle size 0.5 microns and bigger. The covid virus is 0.06 microns which is much smaller than 0.5. Give a good sneeze or speak and you'll blow the covid virus right through that mask. No protection what so ever. Follow
RT @JefferysSteven: @lincolnmjay @realmonsanto You should explain to those folks that: 1. Zero gold standard studies (RCTs) support maskin…
@AnotherBurner03 @globeandmail Or the pro mask weirdos https://t.co/inRk0p3Ejn
@globeandmail About as effective as we were told the last vaccine was or about as effective as masking and lockdowns were https://t.co/inRk0p3Ejn
...observed lack of effect of mask wearing in interrupting the spread of influenza‐like illness (ILI) or influenza/COVID‐19... https://t.co/orcakB0aDU
RT @JefferysSteven: @lincolnmjay @realmonsanto You should explain to those folks that: 1. Zero gold standard studies (RCTs) support maskin…
RT @JefferysSteven: @lincolnmjay @realmonsanto You should explain to those folks that: 1. Zero gold standard studies (RCTs) support maskin…
@JuryTrumpTrial @JohnTwin19 @FoxNews https://t.co/LjXwesI4yI “Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza/SARS‐CoV‐2 compared to not wearing masks”