@ProgRantsPod @Michael53540127 @BIGBEN_209 @TheAvgBlackMan @TomiLahren The most rigorous and comprehensive analysis of scientific studies conducted on the efficacy of masks for reducing the spread of respiratory illnesses, ncluding CoV-19, concluded masks
@KanekoaTheGreat The medical report that is being talked about is here: https://t.co/OiupGXg7zY Read through it carefully. It does NOT say masks are ineffective. It says it's study is inconclusive. Here is another one from 2015, says the same thing: http
@ZachStephens20 @TomiLahren The most rigorous and comprehensive analysis of scientific studies conducted on the efficacy of masks for reducing the spread of respiratory illnesses, including CoV-19, shows masks are ineffective. https://t.co/sq9vqmKRYR
RT @drjaneholland: Media & journalists should not be censoring scientific research & debate. https://t.co/6tIQbJ1Fla https://t.co/l8yf1lKOvX
@dustinthedad @TheEliKlein @joerogan Even N95s fared poorly in the Cochrane review. And they are not healthy to wear for long periods even when fitted properly, especially when fitted properly. https://t.co/Gil9NgmTM0 https://t.co/TLMn2GUida
@scarlett4kids @CDCgov What about “the science?” Sad that CDC gave up science long ago and is now basically a political organization. https://t.co/OLDdGMHjfo
RT @drjaneholland: Media & journalists should not be censoring scientific research & debate. https://t.co/6tIQbJ1Fla https://t.co/l8yf1lKOvX
@BillySmith7778 @TheEliKlein @MiriamETucker @DrJBhattacharya The Cochrane review is a review of many studies, not a single study. In this case 78 randomized control trials. Pushing mask wearing is overzealousness at this point. https://t.co/Gil9NgmTM0
@TheEliKlein Authors' conclusions: The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions. https://t.co/VG9iksABLm
RT @takua_scientist: マスクに効果が無い根拠として、未だに例のコクランを挙げる人がいました。これが根拠にならないことをおさらい。問題は3点。 ①「マスクに効果無し」と言ってません ②対象とした9つ研究のうち非コロナが8つ ③マスク着用率24%の研究が混ざっ…
@KanekoaTheGreat The study doesn’t really say that if you read it closely. First, it is a study of studies — not research itself. And it says that other studies show little or no effect from mask mandates, in part due to poor compliance. https://t.co/I7z
@Jaime_Culebras @Manolotabaiba1 @SUgayos @sanidadgob @apetp_ @StopPseudo La revisión de Cochrane arroja dudas sobre la efectividad de las mascarillas. La lectura de sus conclusiones no tiene desperdicio. https://t.co/2loXX0IJ2k "...did not show a clear re
@sniderstyle @EdKrassen Cochrane has updated its meta analysis of RCTs on masking since 2006. The results have consistently shown no effect. Fauci cited this early in the pandemic, then shifted to relying on confounded observational data when policy prefer
Damit ist das Thema Masken nach meiner Einschätzung beendet. Sollten Masken im Herbst wieder kommen, dann ohne wissenschaftliche Basis. https://t.co/owvyYsQaBO
@jubunnies I am out of patience with the ignorance of people like you who after 3 years still don't know that masks DO NOT work against the virus transmission https://t.co/dF2BsVSbCO
RT @takua_scientist: マスクに効果が無い根拠として、未だに例のコクランを挙げる人がいました。これが根拠にならないことをおさらい。問題は3点。 ①「マスクに効果無し」と言ってません ②対象とした9つ研究のうち非コロナが8つ ③マスク着用率24%の研究が混ざっ…
マスクに効果が無い根拠として、未だに例のコクランを挙げる人がいました。これが根拠にならないことをおさらい。問題は3点。 ①「マスクに効果無し」と言ってません ②対象とした9つ研究のうち非コロナが8つ ③マスク着用率24%の研究が混ざってます https://t.co/ILVq7Bq8U2
@RoySayWhatNow On masks, you should read this: https://t.co/AU0q06lrRD Questioning science is anti-science to you? Asking questions is part of the scientific method. You are following a cult, not science. You said I was being political. What was politic
Regarding the emerging debate on the return of #masks, a few background notes regarding the #Cochrane #mask review paper. Here, I refer to the articles by @VPrasadMDMPH and @MaryanneDemasi (credit!). First, take a look at that paper in question. 1/10 htt
@redvoicenews Follow the science 🧪 Masks DO NOT WORK PERIOD https://t.co/NuXRhPMDeS
@JasonZacharyTN https://t.co/WW9ggq7e4B If you read the review, the authors note the evidence is not conclusive and identifies reviews and individual studies that show a positive effect. Fauci addresses these points in the interview. The review call for w
Wearing masks in the community makes little or no difference to the outcome of COVID‐19 like illness compared to not wearing masks. Full stop! https://t.co/ivtn8PsvTa
@TRyanGregory Do research, upgrade your knowledge and adapt your point of view, that's how logic works. https://t.co/IaGKON8peA
@bbbrazil__ Because masks don't work against virus transmission https://t.co/dF2BsVSbCO
@PaulTreyvaud 'Authors' conclusions: The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions' https://t.co/yoNlDucCP7
@MrStillwater @BeastlySwagman @kevinnbass No this one. https://t.co/xOkI4mvHbT
@KotaroNomo メタ解析って用語は知らないのかナ。 https://t.co/2lp2bnUjMM https://t.co/C4Ji1HTQQt
@miriamjyates @DoverMarian Study/ physical intervention for respiratory viruses - https://t.co/U68P1N59FC
@DoverMarian @swcunningham2 Study/ physical intervention for respiratory viruses - https://t.co/U68P1N59FC
@DoverMarian Study/ physical intervention for respiratory viruses - https://t.co/U68P1N59FC
@HRCFanGal @kprather88 Ever heard of allergies? Study/ physical intervention for respiratory viruses - https://t.co/U68P1N59FC
@kprather88 @soUNTOUCHABLE2 And you’re a pouty woman lobbing insults at strangers instead of reading accurate science. Study/ physical intervention for respiratory viruses - https://t.co/U68P1N59FC
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176
@spyrach21 @elisaperego78 Look who's talking. Why do you think WHO never recommended this pre-covid and why it was never in any pandemic plan? https://t.co/pcUxyw35Wb
RT @robbierusso77: @nilikm What's childish and dangerous is your constant pursuit of control over others with a total lack of medical scien…
RT @robbierusso77: @nilikm @chantz_y @VCHhealthcare Still trying to deny science Nili are we? You took an oath to practice medicine, not po…
@TRyanGregory When to mask if you're scientifically literate: never as even N95s do not prevent viral transmission. #ScienceNotHysteria https://t.co/iLKXbUgcVf
@kevinnbass @scubacuda999 2/ “We are uncertain whether wearing masks or N95/P2 respirators helps to slow the spread of respiratory viruses based on the studies we assessed.” https://t.co/4bSRefWB4o
Todos uds que nunca cuestionaron las mascarillas,NO HAY NINGUNA EVIDENCIA DE QUE FUNCIONEN. Torturaron a los niños porque sí.https://t.co/YlUVAMaapX https://t.co/NOPyoterxn
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Many may not know The science never changed. Fauci told the truth the first time on 60 minutes. He lied the second time a…
@scubacuda999 @Carl_Spackler99 @MKLapole @kevinnbass Cochrane Review isn't convinced. https://t.co/6YqlZygegy
@QTRResearch Helpful context. Here’s the study referenced in the NYT article: https://t.co/gBAWpRGIxC
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176
@BrettYoud @drsimonegold Quoting directly from the study itself: "Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI)/COVID‐19 like illness compared to not wearing masks... " https://t.co/nM
@fox5sandiego Just following link from the Fox article, looks like Fauci's right https://t.co/MEWr2RrUlT https://t.co/YcKtyYzCGi https://t.co/yan7cg2eqn
RT @HDieno: The most comprehensive study (I know of) on the effect of wearing masks to attempt to prevent contraction of cold/flu/Covid inf…
@BarryHunt008 Masks do not stop the spread of C19 https://t.co/wiXoBiPA2g
@BarryHunt008 "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" Source: https://t.co/wiXoBiPA2g
@TRyanGregory Fixed it for you: Just trust the science: https://t.co/p0WojZe70o https://t.co/L77t5W33hu
@TRyanGregory Stupid post. Masks do nothing to slow the spread of respiratory viruses, and the evidence is not the least bit ambiguous. https://t.co/pH2YpUokHF
RT @KritischK: @johanvheerde @ombudsmantrouw @Ipie33 Waar waren jullie kritische vragen over het politieke besluit om mondkapjes in te zett…
@JackPosobiec "Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI)/COVID‐19 like illness compared to not wearing masks" https://t.co/gKwcskf7zi
@GayFabFourFan https://t.co/wy8YgdYC86 The science is clear, masks have no statistically significant impact on transmission. Masks also lead to bacterial pneumonia, and inhalation of VOCs and microplastics. Covid is a cold. What's up with the anti-sc
@luckytran https://t.co/wy8YgdYC86 Masking is not effective in any meaningful way. Why do you hate science?
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176
@ctvottawa Maybe @Sflecce @fordnation @SylviaJonesMPP have read this https://t.co/yrfkvi2ez5
@rickkeen @kevinnbass 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' Jan 2023 https://t.co/KSFDPRXzsy
@KartikLakhotia @MrStillwater @kevinnbass Otherwise read cochrane: https://t.co/cj64GDPE6U
@MrStillwater @KartikLakhotia @kevinnbass No, that is what you believe. It is very clear masks don’t work. Even with surgeons it is a cult since the beginning of the 20th century. (Btw: are you aware of the Cochrane study?, please read: https://t.co/cj64G
@kevinnbass For the "trust the Science!" crowd, why do so many completely ignore the (very comprehensive) Cochrane Library review? https://t.co/XcXS5WayCR
@MrStillwater @marcusbignot @kevinnbass From your linked JAMA article (from 2021): "Recommendations for masks will likely change as more is learned about various mask types and as the pandemic evolves." Yes. More was learned. The Cochrane Library review,
@johanvheerde @ombudsmantrouw @Ipie33 Waar waren jullie kritische vragen over het politieke besluit om mondkapjes in te zetten terwijl er vóór Corona wetenschappelijke consensus was dat mondkapjes niet beschermen tegen respiratoire virussen? Nu bevestigd
@freddrumpf61 @robininfrance @2023_justice @MakisMD Page 176. Most people are not prepared to understand that it’s a eugenics weapon. But if you study - it’s plainly evidenced just like masking inefficiency. MSM news and propaganda outlets like factc
@mindstalk @DCapTO @CorsIAQ @malolisica You're full of shit. You made the original claim. Back it up, or back the fuck off. You can't because you made it the fuck up. Here's one saying they don't do any-fucking-thing as proven by a literature revie
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176
RT @SaulNutri: 📚Una completa revisión publicada en 2023 en Cochrane no encuentra efecto significativo entre el uso de mascarillas y la prop…
@BarryHunt008 Got one for you "useless" https://t.co/dF2BsVSbCO
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176
@ReesiePeacie #coronaphobia is treatable Seek help or inform yourself that masks don't prevent virus transmission https://t.co/UeeyWgfCOa N95vsMedical masks are equally useless: https://t.co/jZeIFBVjKg Same conclusion from the most recent meta-study: https
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176
@GenFlynn @RealJamesWoods 2/3 "no statistically significant evidence" https://t.co/j5Moe8goLT "show no effect of N95 on viral respiratory infections https://t.co/dIVk4APlua "No difference N95 vs surgical masks." https://t.co/VW15VUm3T7 https://t.co/Fa4R36Q
@NEWS_MAKER Even in the face of data they continue to lie to us. https://t.co/inRk0p3Ejn
@Di4mondD4y @kevinnbass The best science we have to date shows masks have zero effect at preventing covid. https://t.co/uSQawEw8Hz
@Ultrogoth2 https://t.co/OtURL3SDHl D'autre part, les masques portés régulièrement ont des effets délétères: manque d'oxygène, polluants, surinfections, effets psychologiques graves chez les très jeunes enfants Le mieux est parfois l'ennemi du bien, le
RT @SaulNutri: 📚Una completa revisión publicada en 2023 en Cochrane no encuentra efecto significativo entre el uso de mascarillas y la prop…
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176
Tell me again why the government did this to us? https://t.co/inRk0p3Ejn
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176
Only scientifically illiterate people and propagandists want to #BringBackMasks. The science has always been clear. Masks (even N95's) do not prevent viral transmission. https://t.co/iLKXbUgcVf
Hey @CanadianTire anyone with a good science background knew from the start that masks (even N95's) are useless at preventing viral infection. Your stores were among the most heavy-handed over this unhinged pseudo-scientific hysteria. Don't do this again.
RT @ESGCanQueSherby: @BanounHelene "aucune preuve statistiquement significative" https://t.co/j5Moe8goLT "ne montrent aucun effet des N95 s…
RT @kevinnbass: Reference: https://t.co/KIYZ1VlEIp Page 176