↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
146 tweeters
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
438 Mendeley
Title
Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003248.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heike Rabe, Gillian ML Gyte, José L Díaz-Rossello, Lelia Duley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 146 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 432 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 12%
Student > Bachelor 48 11%
Researcher 47 11%
Student > Postgraduate 34 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 8%
Other 92 21%
Unknown 133 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 150 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 64 15%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Unspecified 15 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 37 8%
Unknown 146 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2022.
All research outputs
#272,780
of 21,505,234 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#493
of 12,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,188
of 288,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,505,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.