↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
146 tweeters
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
485 Mendeley
Title
Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003248.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heike Rabe, Gillian ML Gyte, José L Díaz-Rossello, Lelia Duley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 146 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 479 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 10%
Student > Bachelor 50 10%
Researcher 48 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 8%
Student > Postgraduate 35 7%
Other 113 23%
Unknown 151 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 155 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 13%
Unspecified 34 7%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 40 8%
Unknown 166 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#303,024
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#520
of 12,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,025
of 342,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.