RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @SunitaReed: @shanpalus I took a rapid test last week but I read this thread that makes me doubt that the tests are worth it. Thoughts?…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @jofromgreylynn: Is this why Chris Bishop is trending in New Zealand?
RT @nicholasphilp: "It’s important to underscore that this conclusion isn’t based on a single Ivy League computer simulation, or a carefull…
RT @jm_robles03: Y queremos engañarnos haciendo pruebas rápidas para las fiestas de Diciembre en las que el 28% salen incorrectas. @lximene…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 22/ Remember my post from yesterday where I said that rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out a #COVID19 infection o…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 22/ Remember my post from yesterday where I said that rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out a #COVID19 infection o…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 22/ Remember my post from yesterday where I said that rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out a #COVID19 infection o…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @gutslutpress: VERY important thread
RT @jofromgreylynn: Is this why Chris Bishop is trending in New Zealand?
@cjsbishop
@DataDrivenMD Saw this today - Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried out by an independent team of international experts found that rapid antigen tests miss 28% to 51% of active
RT @rdumont99: @OhBeing Here a good thread on some of the weaknesses of RATs and strategies is deployment. I didn't realize that omicron ma…
That might blow a hole in the National Party's plan
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @nicholasphilp: "It’s important to underscore that this conclusion isn’t based on a single Ivy League computer simulation, or a carefull…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @nicholasphilp: "It’s important to underscore that this conclusion isn’t based on a single Ivy League computer simulation, or a carefull…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @nicholasphilp: "It’s important to underscore that this conclusion isn’t based on a single Ivy League computer simulation, or a carefull…
@shanpalus I took a rapid test last week but I read this thread that makes me doubt that the tests are worth it. Thoughts? https://t.co/PHZm9fWxIB
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
quite a swathe of the Opposition's Pandemic response "suggestions" have amounted to attempts at corner-cutting quickie 'fixes' to try and show up the Government - which, if implemented, would have rather undercut the response. So, as applies rapid testin
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
Is this why Chris Bishop is trending in New Zealand?
RT @nicholasphilp: "It’s important to underscore that this conclusion isn’t based on a single Ivy League computer simulation, or a carefull…
"It’s important to underscore that this conclusion isn’t based on a single Ivy League computer simulation, or a carefully-crafted company-sponsored clinical trial— this is a *global* review of all available data spanning 59 countries and nearly 25,000 test
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 22/ Remember my post from yesterday where I said that rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out a #COVID19 infection o…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 22/ Remember my post from yesterday where I said that rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out a #COVID19 infection o…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
@michaelmina_lab What say you: https://t.co/dBIYUbXmU5
RT @DataDrivenMD: 22/ Remember my post from yesterday where I said that rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out a #COVID19 infection o…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
22/ Remember my post from yesterday where I said that rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out a #COVID19 infection on their own? (QT’d) I got A LOT of flack from stans of an Ivy Leaguer that also happens to be a paid consultant for a major rapid test
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
@michaelmina_lab This is not true. The tests are not accurate. https://t.co/5HKyDplSGQ
@michaelmina_lab We now know that 28-51% of rapid antigen tests are not accurate. this has been easily observable throughout the pandemic — so many sick people get negative tests. Why are you ignoring this? https://t.co/5HKyDplSGQ
@michaelmina_lab What about this
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
Added thing. You need to wait 5-6 days to take them before you think you may have been exposed. Also, it takes two tests, two days in a row, to ensure higher accuracy more on level (but not at same level) w/ a PCR test.
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
VERY important thread
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
@NurseTexas @Laurie_Garrett 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried out by an independent team of international experts found that rapid antigen tests miss 28% to 51% of active
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
@CarolynCannu @kprather88 I thought so too but just read this thread about the low accuracy of the rapid tests: https://t.co/PHZm9fWxIB
RT @HillaryFan420: Oh, good. It’s gonna be a wild January.
@hugodejonge @ministervanvws @GGDGHORNL
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
Oh, good. It’s gonna be a wild January.
Oki dok
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…