@ProfFarukAYDIN @Klimud @esenol @saglikbakanligi @drfahrettinkoca Test yapmadan okuluna işe gidecek ve bulaştırmaya devam edecek kişileri yakalamadaki %72'lik oran az değil. Preanalitik ve analitik hatalara bağlı PCR duyarlılığı ile kıyaslanırsa hele. http
RT @centinel5051: "Los tests de antígenos identificaron correctamente la infección por COVID-19 en un promedio del 72% de las personas con…
RT @centinel5051: "Los tests de antígenos identificaron correctamente la infección por COVID-19 en un promedio del 72% de las personas con…
"Los tests de antígenos identificaron correctamente la infección por COVID-19 en un promedio del 72% de las personas con síntomas, en un 58% de las personas sin síntomas." https://t.co/vfS6kIwHwO
RT @SaiyanBio: D’ailleurs, je ne suis pas le seul à le dire 👇
@djcarrollmagic @DrKateTO HahahahahHaha so funny. Here you go, Cochrane articles are all peer reviewed before publication -58% accurate- https://t.co/2rhV0wVOuI
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 13/ This workaround remains largely unproven at scale. Some newer studies are suggest it’s worth a try. That said, the da…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 13/ This workaround remains largely unproven at scale. Some newer studies are suggest it’s worth a try. That said, the da…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
@cosmicpinot this study says that there is little to be gained by repeat tests. The same applies to false negatives (which, surely , are more important?): https://t.co/h7siyHkwc1
@HelenBranswell No, it just doesn’t matter. https://t.co/nqDtTrk3rW
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @Abettervision: So 58% of those who are confirmed positive show no symptoms at all. Is this why Christmas in Canada allows no househol…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
@noreasonspec @ljayes They’re not accurate enough to really rule out, especially in asymptomatic people. Lots of false negatives that your method would be sending home to not isolate etc but who actually have Covid https://t.co/PhFK05ATes
Shitty vaccines. Shitty rapid tests. What a combination. No worries. SARSCov2 has joined hundreds of viruses causing the common cold.
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
So 58% of those who are confirmed positive show no symptoms at all. Is this why Christmas in Canada allows no households to gather if even one non-v'd is present?
RT @theotherphilipp: Wow! Geschätzt 1 Milliarde Steuergelder durch den Schornstein. Pro Monat. Für Nonsens! Das muss diese Wissenschaft…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @DataDrivenMD: 22/ Remember my post from yesterday where I said that rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out a #COVID19 infection o…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @theotherphilipp: Wow! Geschätzt 1 Milliarde Steuergelder durch den Schornstein. Pro Monat. Für Nonsens! Das muss diese Wissenschaft…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @theotherphilipp: Wow! Geschätzt 1 Milliarde Steuergelder durch den Schornstein. Pro Monat. Für Nonsens! Das muss diese Wissenschaft…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
Wow! Geschätzt 1 Milliarde Steuergelder durch den Schornstein. Pro Monat. Für Nonsens! Das muss diese Wissenschaft sein, von der immer alle reden.
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symptoms, compared to 58% of ppl without symptoms. Tests were most accurate when used in the first week AFTER symptoms first developed”
RT @DataDrivenMD: 13/ This workaround remains largely unproven at scale. Some newer studies are suggest it’s worth a try. That said, the da…
@ericJpedersen @JJMlynarek Thank you. Had not seen this. I was looking at this big evidence summary here: https://t.co/oFVgxNzRYD These two different analyses seem to be consistent. If I understand correctly: RAT = excellent to rule out #COVID19, if sym
@ZoroBab18498435 @lbertrand081 @AndrePitre_LUX J'ai que ça à faire dépenser mon argent pour un truc que je sais déjà que c'est des conneries. Si les gens ne sont pas capables de respecter des simples consignes pour un autotest, c'est qu'ils sont sacrément
@cherikoko06 @Pie61971938Jean @lbertrand081 @AndrePitre_LUX Ne soyez pas con, quand vous remplissez votre char, vous mettez pas du diesel, si c'est une essence, là, c'est pareil, si vous suivez la procédure "normal", ces tests fonctionnent, avec une marge
@nexusplexus @drvyom @VictorianCHO In people with confirmed COVID-19, antigen tests correctly identified COVID-19 infection in an average of 72% of people with symptoms, compared to 58% of people without symptoms- food for thought https://t.co/LRX1H2JAAJ
@WesElyMD It depends on what one is testing/type of test etc. Here is a reference. https://t.co/97XxSGgdrf
@saraforgues There's less data available about NAAT tests, but generally speaking, the FDA EUA process has held up well for those. Meaning the FDA hasn't been subjected to the pressure to relax standards in the same way they have been re: rapid antigens te
@rant_rn @TheELongWave @erdocAA @JeanmarcBenoit @dockaurG @ashkaur @GilNimni @RidaKMirza @doc_turek @silvana_bolano @DrKellyVictory @CommonSenseMD1 @DonaldWelsh16 @Metabo_PhD “antigen tests correctly identified COVID-19 infection in an average of 72% of pe
@EmergencyBlog Cette revue Cochrane m'apparaît pertinente: https://t.co/tAw9hVNtoN "Due to the variable sensitivity of antigen tests, people who test negative may still be infected."
@Kittykitano @usehead_heart @imgrund From cochrane https://t.co/sEIWIbL6pL
@michaeljswalker @BQuilty @ScienceShared @kallmemeg Rudimentary fact-checking should be within your pay grade. https://t.co/c4uvID7WK6
@bonnieallan72 @DrKGregorevic That’s great thank you! If possible can you ask if Anita has data on positive cases that present no symptoms ? I found this but unsure if it relates to today approved RAT… https://t.co/HkscAQ1SBY
@amarsaini1548 @SamHarrisOrg 98% is wrong. It's 72% but that's still pretty damn high https://t.co/2b6P9JwLvg
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
@Bob_Wachter @CDCgov #FN allowed? How many False Neg should we allow, knowing that antigen tests are imperfect and Omicron variants in nucleocapsid likely lower antigen accuracy? Maybe time to switch to LAMP test ms for home use
@KrauseKraig @CTVBarrieNews These tests are 72% correct when a person of symptomatic and only right 58% of the time when a person isn’t showing symptoms. https://t.co/9RGYkuvXvb
Now that I’ve calmed down (sorry, not sorry), self-administered RATs don’t protect the clinically vulnerable. They miss too many cases, especially in the asymptomatic. Here’s the Cochrane review: https://t.co/tJunwsp6nf
@Bob_Wachter Great 🧵. But self-administered RATs don’t protect the clinically vulnerable. They miss too many cases, especially in the asymptomatic. Here’s the Cochrane review: https://t.co/tJunwsp6nf And here’s some anecdata (all guests neg RAT, then all
@no1historychick They don’t even detect reliably, in the context of self-testing. https://t.co/tJunwsp6nf
For those recommending the usefulness of rapid testing in asymptomatic individuals please educate me on the science. https://t.co/qOnVGh4RGr https://t.co/pXdDdoltJL
RT @WiktoriaKrasno1: operacyjny i psychiczny na te jednostki” Test antygenowy: https://t.co/Vb7u26BjO8 Dodatni test PCR może się utr…
RT @WiktoriaKrasno1: operacyjny i psychiczny na te jednostki” Test antygenowy: https://t.co/Vb7u26BjO8 Dodatni test PCR może się utr…