RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: @BeltKlaas @BartMaes16 https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in at‐risk asymptomatic gr…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
Geen bewijs van test-effectiviteit gevonden door Cochrane,bij mensen zonder klachten. Dit onderzoeksinstituut heeft een enorme reputatie. Ze zijn goed in het sorteren en combineren van wetenschappelijke onderzoeken tot een helder overzicht.
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: @BeltKlaas @BartMaes16 https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in at‐risk asymptomatic gr…
RT @the_stinging: @BeltKlaas @BartMaes16 https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in at‐risk asymptomatic gr…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in at‐risk asymptomatic groups, such as contacts…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in at‐risk asymptomatic groups, such as contacts…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in at‐risk asymptomatic groups, such as contacts…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in at‐risk asymptomatic groups, such as contacts…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
👀
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N Cochrane Library: hoogste graad van bewijs: "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in a…
RT @the_stinging: @BeltKlaas @BartMaes16 https://t.co/yuhBJ6609N "We did not find any evidence of test accuracy in at‐risk asymptomatic gr…
@SkyNewsAust While there is debate around the viability of transmission within the preliminary asymptomatic phase and immediate treatment is scarce, this broad scale analysis of Rapid Antigen Testing shows 42% false negativety during the term, often exceed
@LBPookachoo @MethodActorPSN @EnochRootDreams Sorry to hijack, thought it might be useful. https://t.co/G6GAcffXO8 This suggests that rapid tests are 72% effective at detecting COVID, when symptoms are present, and 58% when not present. Not sure on the
@voiceofambition @rafabravo @FernandoFabiani Es una opción. En el peor de los casos, si se realiza correctamente, detectará a 4 de 10 infectados sin sintomatología. Pero 6 de cada 10 infectados darán un resultado negativo falso. Este resultado (-), no deb
@MichelNicolasA1 @LaurentJolle2 @elleestcybele @AlizeeRenault @patricktrazzi @OSS117_Helsinki Pour les AG, il faut tenir compte si symptomatique ou pas, du moment du prélèvement et de la marque du test ... Il y a cette étude qui en parle https://t.co/acoK4
@ravinCanadin @LindsayTedds @gdnicholson "In people who did not have COVID-19, antigen tests correctly ruled out infection in 99.5% of people with symptoms and 98.9% of people without symptoms." https://t.co/bFSPPY2jRm. False positives are extremely rare
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
@MartianOtter Creo que el documento lo deja bastante claro, no voy a perder el tiempo discutiendo sobre eso viendo como te refieres a los tests. Y los test de antígenos suelen dar falsos negativos, los falsos positivos son muy raros. https://t.co/vfS6kIwHw
COVID tests explained in greater depth : https://t.co/lELN9Urd5y
@Mark_Coughlan @REDCMD This seems relevant https://t.co/R8Gg6EpFkI
@Africanlegnd @nsgov unfortunately it's way worse (even was before Omicron): https://t.co/OwRp9wnLFR
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
@OG97921596 @nsgov Source: https://t.co/OwRp9wnLFR
@BreakfastNews Rapid antigen tests are still being reviewed. The fact that we are relying on them now shows a severe mismanagement by our political leaders. https://t.co/acwQIA3NxG
@tshirtman @Thornhill_R_O @OSS117_Helsinki https://t.co/glaNONgMhm Environ 80% de sensibilité avec symptômes (pas mal quand même).
@Natasha_KC1 @annavshelton Cochrane Review - gold standard of research- “In people with confirmed COVID‐19, antigen tests correctly identified COVID‐19 infection in an average of 72% of people with symptoms, compared to 58% of people without symptoms.” Yo
Important stat on Antigen tests: False positives can account for 25% of positive results. False negatives however, are more rare, and can be 1% or less. My takeaway: trust a negative, re-test a positive via https://t.co/zlYzqgnZrD
@carolinecherry Il y a d'autres sources aussi : https://t.co/7klcHGnw0j Mais bon, bien sûr vous vous testez comme vous voulez...
@vnangia Good. Keep in mind, though, that rapid antigen tests aren't entirely accurate https://t.co/QjDLc7kYMR
How accurate are rapid tests for diagnosing COVID-19? | Cochrane https://t.co/Tb9vZMdjXL
@MichaelTGorman rapid test reliable? Sorry, what happened to "follow the science"? 72% detection in symptomatic cases 58% detection in asymptomatic cases https://t.co/OwRp9wnLFR
@eoinneylon @ReidySean @CMOIreland @PhilipNolan_MU Maybe we should leave the real expert explain it. The lead Author of the review. You know that real expert who said NPHET were correct. Not you, who obviously don't have a clue.... https://t.co/FV3cex8ZvB
Evidence for asymptomatic testing is limited. Test accuracy studies cannot adequately assess the ability of antigen tests to differentiate those who are infectious from those who pose no risk, as there is no reference standard for infectiousness. 3/ http
This thread typifies misinformation doing the rounds on antigen testing. This anesthesiologist misrepresents the study he links, cheery picking phrases that undermine report conclusion. The study found false negatives very rare but false positives have the
@eoinneylon @ReidySean @CMOIreland @PhilipNolan_MU So this expert is misinterpreting it too. Not to mention the lead Author back Philip Nolan's views. https://t.co/IFQ0gM9Sx3
@chat_annie @ReidySean @CMOIreland @PhilipNolan_MU Maybe you should actually read the thing for yourself before falsely trying to cite it as saying something that it clearly doesn't! https://t.co/1ja9lBVqTn Your inability to research even the studies you
@mscott7612 @MoragMcGuire @orton_adrian @MhairiHunter Not really. They miss a significant number of cases and give quite a few false positives too. https://t.co/fjVDNHOOQF
@KellyB_Oxford Best wishes for a quick recovery. LFTs have upto 40% false negative rate. Worse when asymptomatic. https://t.co/FCmTnUVApG Agree with advice for PCR.
@yayitsrob This review of multiple studies concluded that for 10,000 people with no symptoms, only 125 people would test positive for COVID-19 and of these, 90 people (72%) be false positives. https://t.co/dm6rLJOx6a
@nick_coatsworth Bullshit. RATs have high error rates- ‘people with confirmed COVID-19, antigen tests correctly identified infection in average of 72% of people with symptoms, only 58% of people without symptoms’ https://t.co/t3r8ETseHL
@cineMoiJe D’après cet article d’il y a 9 mois, ça dépend des marques de tests, mais s’il n’avait pas de symptômes, il y aurait 72 % de faux positifs suite à test antigénique https://t.co/668qjNHz3m
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
@love_kitkat @Thebauser @DrHannahBB Sorry I don't think this is quite right. LFTs are not actually more sensitive when assymptomatic (actually less) but the negative predictive value is adequate (although this could not be true when high prevalence) and th
@Egotada @NewsReputation 58% de casos detectados en asintomáticos. https://t.co/D4dI8wNXJo
RT @DataDrivenMD: 🧵/Unpopular fact: rapid tests should *not* be used to rule out #COVID19 infection. A review of scientific data carried ou…
@APB173 @ScotTories @BBCScotlandNews Source for that claim? Or did Aunty Gladys on FB tell you they were only 40% accurate you might want to tell her she’s wrong have a read of this https://t.co/CTNWL4ztQX
@DrGRuralMD Specificity is overall good for both molecular and rapid. There's a review of rapids here: https://t.co/ihTA9mzHk1 In low incidence areas even very good specificity can produce some false positives. I don't have much info beyond anecdotal for t
RT @centinel5051: "Los tests de antígenos identificaron correctamente la infección por COVID-19 en un promedio del 72% de las personas con…
RT @centinel5051: "Los tests de antígenos identificaron correctamente la infección por COVID-19 en un promedio del 72% de las personas con…
@EzraKahan People need to understand that these tests are not designed for people without symptoms. In fact, in this study they found if you don't have symptoms you are more likely to get a false positive than if you had symptoms. https://t.co/ypD86huMAh
@cafe_american0 @Mr_Roamin @CPita3 meta-analysis of data more than a year old & including unapproved tests https://t.co/DupTRbPDVg
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
RT @dockaurG: Cochrane Review of 64 studies “In ppl with confirmed Covid, antigen tests identified infection in avg of 72% of ppl with symp…
@ProfFarukAYDIN @Klimud @esenol @saglikbakanligi @drfahrettinkoca Test yapmadan okuluna işe gidecek ve bulaştırmaya devam edecek kişileri yakalamadaki %72'lik oran az değil. Preanalitik ve analitik hatalara bağlı PCR duyarlılığı ile kıyaslanırsa hele. http
RT @centinel5051: "Los tests de antígenos identificaron correctamente la infección por COVID-19 en un promedio del 72% de las personas con…