@voice_hard @BreezerGalway @MdBreathe Re: "one guy's opinion" No, it's experts from Cochrane. So you lied again. "the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed random
@eolecow3 @mtgreenee Your site uses people to decide which studies to include or not include. If you follow the Cochrane risk of bias to remove biased studies, the results are quite different. Your source also includes studies with multiple treaments not j
RT @MedicalScitech: @Covid19Critical #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 https://t.co/Z5PcZYwzUV References to studies includ…
@have_joke @ChildofSoros Nouja, ik kan er wel iets van een studie uitgooien, maar de shit is dat er heel veel wordt geknoeid met studies. Het is alleen wel opvallend dat de studies die positief uitpakken voor ivm zulke duidelijke fouten hebben. https://t.
@AltroEmanuele @laboccadellave4 @Matteo721548991 @OrtigiaP Appunto non sai che dire. https://t.co/0tln1mPfuU
@TokeBoisen Det er vist temmelig grundigt slået i jorden. Toppen af poppen inden for meta-analyser (Cochrane) har en artikel om det her: https://t.co/DzuWyA9q3c
@BitcoinMidas_ It probably won’t hurt but it also probably won’t help. Note that “inhibits replication” is in vitro, not in vivo. And the dosages where it’s significant would be deadly. This analysis of multiple studies shows no good reason to expect a p
@ZeeMagistra @BuckSexton Check out the meta study done by Cochrane review. Is dumb to say it’s just horse paste, but it isn’t necessarily showing results https://t.co/xClh7pp2MI
@Joseph24016799 @Fraslin Je ne peux pas lire l'ensemble de l'article, notamment la partie vérification. Mais les données scientifiques sont claires : l'ivermectine est inefficace pour traiter le COVID. https://t.co/v9ZcYryosT
@AndreaSausS1 @TomWhatsoever @MartinCJanssen Das stimmt, war nur ein schönes Beispiel, was passiert, wenn inkompetente Menschen wie Herr Janssen glauben, Tipps geben zu müssen. Hier etwas Lesestoff von fachlicher Seite. https://t.co/zAdWbbu1TA
@Lakecat3 @HuuhtanenPanu @persut @VKansalle Ivermectin ei tehoa Koronaan. https://t.co/khRgHCUCaV
@CBBlackadar A much better meta-analysis is here https://t.co/KS0Z6eqv4y
@JackDan110 @LadyNaomiRoss @red4201983 @michaudlarry @jkenney I have, the Medical Journals say Ivermectin doesn't work ;) https://t.co/ksPUeHHSdr
@GeronimoGuuJiYa @guiraudn @0o0O0o0oo000 @franceinfo “L'évaluation de l'ivermectine se poursuit dans 31 études en cours, et nous mettrons à jour cette revue avec leurs résultats lorsqu'ils seront disponibles.” https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
RT @mph_for_doctors: コクランジャパンがこのタイミングでこれをツイートすることの意味を理解した方がいいと思います。 DaiGoさんの炎上のあとに厚労省が生活保護のツイートをした時のように、メッセージ性を感じ取って欲しいです。
@njmidm @Erna_1969d @GodPrinciple @DocDoorsnee @VaxxDoc @Doc_Box @xManon_S @MsMonsanto Precies. Daarvoor doe je gerandomiseerd onderzoek of, als dat niet kan, een goed uitgevoerd observationele studie. Cochrane, gouden standaard van de meta-analyse, heef
@MarinaRassin @Unfinishedsen18 @reageren1 @IkNet @ArtsenC Je zult het wel fake, nep vinden, maar dit artikel heb ik in mijn “Coronamap”. Het is een analyse van een aantal onderzoeken. Doe er je voordeel mee! https://t.co/jexLS5KKhM
@AnjaBaarslag @WimVanDuin @Savornsavorn @AT5 Bij deze aannemende dar u wetenschappelijk data kunt begrijpen https://t.co/TnlTfTioqE
@Fauntleroy1934 @lsferguson @ISHINE22 You know Ivermectin does nothing for people with COVID19, severe enough to be hospitalized. Question your research skills sir. https://t.co/Da20dVr5vD
1. @2ysur2ysub @PierreKory Very interesting that half of the patients were vaccinated. That could have influenced the study because of the adverse effects of the vaccine itself. Dr. @PierreKory what do you say? also Ivermectin is not given alone in the
@Celti1 @Vincenso_Farro @vicpei1 Pardonnez-moi de m'immiscer dans cette discussion intéressante... Le Cochrane Institute tient à jour un état de l'art sur l'ivermectine comme traitement contre la COVID-19. Je me permets de mettre le lien ici : https://t.c
@Harry73865546 @trouw #ivermectine is nog niet wetenschappelijk bewezen dat het wel werkt https://t.co/TnlTfTioqE
@Ruud1205 @MinVWS Nee andere die in de fabels rondom #ivermectine geloven. Zie keiharde WETENSCHAPPELIJKE data, het is niet bewezen dat het werkt. https://t.co/TnlTfTioqE
@Desirezie @matthijsgdj @ArtsenC @hugodejonge @IGJnl Zeker. En het werkt prima tegen schurft. Helaas niet tegen covid. Cochrane heeft een uitgebreide meta-analyse gedaan van het beschikbare bewijs. Ik zou zeggen, lees ‘m eens. https://t.co/7gyKd5oCOE h
@DanGurneyH Yeah, this is what shows up there. The following link is supposedly the same content, but the images are all absurdly tiny, and the way the data are presented with the pubmed formatting is tedious to sort through. https://t.co/bNntydpeB9 https:
@TrevorSutcliffe What did I link to at chochrane? What image is that? Here is an actual link. https://t.co/e3IyCAfaJ8
@TrevorSutcliffe This is an actual Meta-analysis. Published by the chochrane library, the people who know to perform and analyse an actual meta-analysis. https://t.co/e3IyCAfaJ8
RT @Newcli0: コクランもEMAも臨床試験以外では使うなとするイベルメクチンをお勧めしワクチン接種率向上に目もくれない医療ジャーナリスト()伊藤隼也さん… https://t.co/MfVOkq4z79 https://t.co/Q1DlpuKK4f https:…
@popoche69008 Il est mort le 25 septembre et je ne pense pas que l’ivermectine aurait pu le sauver. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@Alain_Al_Akin L'évaluation de l'ivermectine se poursuit dans 31 études en cours, et nous mettrons à jour cette revue avec leurs résultats lorsqu'ils seront disponibles. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@PunkMacro @survivalspence @DrEliDavid Lol. Ivermectin is not proven to do anything with covid. Vaccines are. https://t.co/xIeTxY5rWc
@Dragonssitter @DavidPNoble63 The thing is it has been tried in multiple randomised controlled trials and is continuing to be used in trials, but so far it has not been shown to be the miracle drug some claim it to be. Source: https://t.co/m3DzssJwQV.
@LOPESQUINTAS Bon, arrêtez avec l’ivermectine. “L'évaluation de l'ivermectine se poursuit dans 31 études en cours, et nous mettrons à jour cette revue avec leurs résultats lorsqu'ils seront disponibles.” Pour l’instant on en est là : https://t.co/hHJ022k
IVM does not kill you. The jabs do... I used IVM and I had severe Covid...IVM was the lifesaver.. Easy to fabricate anti IVM propaganda. Should we put Jabs to the test, I see huge claims coming. Big Pharma, Gates, Fauci should be trialed and receive the u
@graingermedia @RealSueKelly @david_o_gabriel @MerielMyers You should also take a look at the Cochrane review They found very little evidence of effectiveness https://t.co/bwzClidjoK
On the payroll?
So is the list of patients cured - just like in this example https://t.co/6m8tNZ5o3z
@AnneElizabethUS @babyloncatholic @FYeuxx @shrinkrap69 @NurtecODT https://t.co/QbLG0VxIyN How come when i search "ivermectin nih" all the results are like this? https://t.co/KSnE4mMT6G
Ivermectin für die Prävention und Behandlung von COVID-19 | Cochrane https://t.co/UycIDcuejH
Ben non Informe toi un peu https://t.co/BfJNwvxbv9
@superweini Ich ignoriere keine Studie. Sie haben mir nur keine geschickt. Sie haben mir nur eine Werbungsseite für Ivermectin geschickt. Ich könnte Ihnen zB aus Pubmed zitieren; https://t.co/SVoRwa6sMk Aussage: Bisher kein Sinn in Behandlung. https://t.co
@marc_g_wathelet Sont-ils aussi vendus aux big pharma chez Cochrane? https://t.co/gQQh9dEoMl
@Alex78213 @EMoonihoawa1 @Michell69397997 Ivermectin failed high quality clinical trials for COVID-19 patients. It has no anti-viral properties against SARS-CoV-2. Your anecdote does not control for confounding variables or observer bias. https://t.co/w1pR
@IllusionMask @RMechoui @OdileDori @julien_hoang @olivierveran Voici un site reconnu. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@gmeeus2 Re: "She used the Cochrane method" Again, you're deceitful. "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials" https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC
@OneValmor @olivierveran L'ivervectime n'est toujours pas prouvée comme étant efficace sur le covid. Les preuves sont faible et confondable avec un effet placebo. https://t.co/r60hF58RUK L'exemple de votre ami ne peu servir de preuve, il faut beaucoup pl
@JamesfWells @GJay_4 Actually, you, or any of them, should post some level 1 evidence if you're going to question efficiency or effectiveness of masks. I've posted level 1 evidence proving Ivermectin is effective but inefficient against #Covid_19. https:/
RT @Fon3n1: @covid19maskjp やべぇ… @ecoyuri 小池都長、これは大丈夫ですか…? 下記リンクにイベルメクチンは効果が無いというファクトがあります。 また、この元のツイートは消されていますが、海外では笑いのネタにされていました。 それでもや…
@gmeeus2 We make medical guidelines based on evidence, not your contrarian preferences. "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials" https
@ojimakohei <独自>東京都、コロナ経口薬の治験協力開始 https://t.co/iTv7KU8GGr @Sankei_newsより おじま先生、下記リンクを読んで、直ちに中止を願います。税金の無駄使いです… 🙇♂️🙏 https://t.co/UsCMIFRHQb
@covid19maskjp やべぇ… @ecoyuri 小池都長、これは大丈夫ですか…? 下記リンクにイベルメクチンは効果が無いというファクトがあります。 また、この元のツイートは消されていますが、海外では笑いのネタにされていました。 それでもやるんですか? 税金の使い道を考えて下さい… https://t.co/UsCMIFRHQb https://t.co/mCsj8S5tcf
@ay130208 @Sankei_news また、それらのメタ解析に使われたものも含めた研究結果など対して一つ一つ検証した研究者は数限りなくいますが、一番信頼性の高いものはコクランレビュー(最も厳密なメタアナリシス)だと思います。 https://t.co/UHhUhSYn4s こちらに除外された研究が乗っています。
@ChangingChannel @LyndaShumway1 @drsimonegold Here is the science for ivermectin and it states: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials
@Grompf3 Il y a un médicament plus efficace, je pense, ça s'appelle le Placebo. Mais bon, c'est une formule qui a dû être développée par Big Pharma. Au point qu'ils l'utilisent dans toutes leurs études... https://t.co/6xXmPOFMTi
@lizard817 @mtgreenee @TwitterSupport I reported her for that disinformation but if she had any actual education, she'd know go use level 1 evidence, rather than levels 2, 3, or 4 when providing researched information. https://t.co/d3tfUqtvnX
@NazzariStefano @ritafrediani Sono informato, sulla Cochrane: https://t.co/e61iVN7oke E anche su FDA https://t.co/KSE3dNUzmT O NJM https://t.co/T7jy5v5TDC #miocuggino non pervenuto..
@headspaceman @dietcheese @SarumanWise @BretWeinstein @alexandrosM So falsifiability isn't the issue. The issue is people taking seriously a paranoid non-expert making claims outside their field of expertise, in contradiction to numerous experts who know
@DominiqueSompel @vangeel_sam @KParaat @R137K @GardenofE2 @p_jvanos @KoenMestdagh 2/2 Indien het wat lastig is om die betrouwbaarheid zelf te evalueren, de onbetrouwbaarheid is al in kaart gebracht hoor : https://t.co/19plHxWPTY en https://t.co/FDlm6ll5gT
@vangeel_sam @DominiqueSompel @KParaat @R137K @GardenofE2 @p_jvanos @KoenMestdagh 2/2 Of dergelijke analyses eens lezen die dat kritisch bekijken ook al eens gedaan hebben : https://t.co/FDlm6ll5gT en https://t.co/19plHxWPTY (wat ik dus al stelde : de enig
2) Pubmed meta analysis is inconclusive at best https://t.co/90BQPKip2g As a pharmacist, I'm alarmed at the number of leftists promoting unverified and inclusive treatments. Please stop this and respect the current CDC guidelines. Get vaccinated.
@Tedramar @my_throw @maysolblue @CHAMBERLINPatr2 @lynns68gwada971 Donc vous n’avez rien pour étayer vos propos. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@ardjiman Nog eentje dan: https://t.co/16hOZCg4LG
@angrysoba @BretWeinstein @alexandrosM Re: "The evidence for it is bad" Yup. "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials" https://t.co/9M
@Dr_brightside1 @BretWeinstein @alexandrosM Re: "actual experts" Experts say: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials" https://t.co/9M