@ABridgen https://t.co/JmY7ItG9Sr

@MIpomene @VigilantFox Ok thank you for reading it for me ..but if you go to the Cochrane library which is the most trusted independent medical research meta analysis organisation on the planet you will see the efficacy of ivermectin on C19 is inconclusiv

@MarkkuKarttune2 Älä viitsi valehdella, ei ollut vaihtoehtoja. https://t.co/jZPD70gb2Y

@lorraine_logie @CKellyUAP You're fixated on Thalidomide. Yet not ivermectin. Ivermectin has been through about a dozen large trials for Covid globally. It failed 100%. So hey ho, you're flailing. READ https://t.co/5z79dprkz9

@Woodynist @insins31544458 @DocCyrReb88 @bitcoin_collect @CarolineFiat54 @HAS_sante @FrcsBraun @acadmed Il n’ a jamais été question d’un vaccin anti Covid a visée curative Ça tombe bien les Meta analyse montent que la vit D et l’ivermectine n’ont pas d’ef

@Australians_1st @senatorbabet Yeah. No. https://t.co/Tgr71Gl6Ss

@Woodynist @DocCyrReb88 @bitcoin_collect @CarolineFiat54 @HAS_sante @FrcsBraun Ok une étude en phase 2 .. Et sur l’ensemble des études sur ivermectine / Covid 19 , Cochrane dit ceci : https://t.co/94iZtoa46W

@BrainySilicon @MikeCarlton01 https://t.co/Tgr71Gl6Ss

@ColdSpearo @TravIsScience @HeyNurseKat @HealthcareGlob1 https://t.co/Tgr71Gl6Ss

@ColdSpearo @HealthcareGlob1 @HeyNurseKat It’s also for river-blindness (onchocerciasis) and deworming humans. It’s a good drug, that does nothing much for Covid. https://t.co/Tgr71Gl6Ss

@Francis_Watts @goddeketal Suppression of ivermectin information was a big mistake. The government should have simply explained why there was no good mechanistic reason why ivermectin should work, and meta analysis showed no clear signal. https://t.co/95V

@DrJackieStone @FoxtrotBilly @RickyShaw07 This is a different topic entirely and your results are encouraging (accepting the limitations listed in the trial) but sadly larger studies investigating IVM have not been able to replicate these findings into cli

@DoctoraPrego @BreatheMD Estudios y artículo sobre la ineficacia de la ivermectina (hay cientos) y una muestra de cómo los estudios favorables han sido retractados o fuertemente criticados: https://t.co/cdJBLSS401 https://t.co/dvCdHHWOio https://t.co/2253

@WakiLaurence https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@IbachPeter Habe nochmal das mit der cochrane-Review zu Ivermectin gefunden: https://t.co/99RL9BcJBg

@lorraine_logie @Iansn57 @profnfenton @DiegoHAWK666 @ICS_updates It’s such a shame that ivermectin hasn’t been shown to work against covid. It would have been brilliant if it did (cheap, off patient, widely available including in LMIC) https://t.co/eUGwhvB

@HarryBlack303 @profnfenton Because they were trialled & found not to be effective https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7

@insins31544458 @kamikukamiku @Janec71 @rogerpointe @Nain_Portekoi De quelle qualité sont les études ? Parce que c'est pas tout mais voici un truc un poil solide qui va pas vraiment vous plaire. https://t.co/xcRWhQgMNp

@ColdSpearo @meredithmusing @JordanA8156 @conservallstar @HeyNurseKat @249_519 @MAGARIFFIC2 Not CNN. https://t.co/Tgr71Gl6Ss

@pia_mapia @PhilTornade @ben_oit @Renkatroussier2 Bah alors mon petit troll pourquoi tu ne mets pas le lien du Cochrane et leur conclusion... en 2021 ! Pour info l'étude du Cochrane figure dans la méta analyse du "site pourri" (étayé par rien évidemment) P

Qué bueno que sabe analizar, e interpretar la evidencia científica, doctor. Lo que no dudo es que sus pacientes con COVID19 esten con menos piojos y helmintos. https://t.co/aHM8PJEdEB

RT @Witch_d0ct0r_: @poisonJadeVine Ojo q Cochrane aún no ha encontrado evidencia irrefutable de q no sirva nada o que haga daño https://t.c…

@poisonJadeVine Ojo q Cochrane aún no ha encontrado evidencia irrefutable de q no sirva nada o que haga daño https://t.co/4XRjDMCRfN , además, viendo en perspectiva lo que sucedió, no se tuvo evidencia de ningún tratamiento al principio, se atrevieron a da

@Bradd_Hatfield @hanassa35 @MakisMD Here is what real evidence, and not the ravings of a murderous psychopath, look like: https://t.co/Dw1fe2C9AR https://t.co/KMfs0RLmCZ

@LetsGoBrando45 https://t.co/HwCwwZf7Ps Pierre Kory "successfully" treated patients who were not at high risk of complications, thus his stats were great. That's not a peer reviewed study, it's selective positioning for his own benefit. See the link for t

@chedca @jim_reed @VaccineMole @the_coopertron Ivermectin? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7

@JasonRCravens @crabb_vicki @Pouldeau61 @ogilville1 @WebGuyTV @richykirsh @mcfunny @arsibd @LummHandy @JonathanHannah @MaureenStroud @TakethatCt @Monstercoyliar @of_zeitgeist @Scary7Dr @doom37455413 @pawley_robert @ConsequentialBr @SkepticalMutant @JimeeLi

@CKellyUAP Wack job. Meanwhile Craig, the unqualified furniture salesman, promotes Ivermectin. He is likely responsible for the death of 100s of people by discouraging vaccination. What Cochrane says about Ivermectin: https://t.co/Tgr71Gl6Ss

@IMHO__2017 @AlastairMcA30 👇

@chiamami_V @ladyonorato Ma sono così buono che tieni. Scommetto che saprai leggerlo e capire da solo quale sia il problema https://t.co/GyproTLyQg 👀

@insins31544458 @Mortalvenin @philippeherlin Ah et ou sont les source de ces études.. cobaye car perso, tout ce que je trouve dit le contraire ! https://t.co/WdJ1mYriFl https://t.co/j8iHSFxNVY https://t.co/wo1Zw8iVYG

@FORCEPS4 ノーマスクさんたちが絶対の信頼を寄せるコクランに論文が出てゐますね Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 | Cochrane https://t.co/QFTjn51twq

@Thiele1of4 @drsimonegold See also this review (no effect) https://t.co/J8ZSV1AmaZ

@unhealthytruth I think u guys have once again fallen into the medical industry trap. https://t.co/HT36CG8czb

RT @Scary7Dr: @PhilipRafferty5 @silkweaver7 @richykirsh @doom37455413 @lazlowoodbine42 @JonathanHannah @Monstercoyliar @MaureenStroud @mcfu…

@PhilipRafferty5 @silkweaver7 @richykirsh @doom37455413 @lazlowoodbine42 @JonathanHannah @Monstercoyliar @MaureenStroud @mcfunny @pawley_robert @ConsequentialBr @SkepticalMutant @JimeeLiberty @JKelleyK @Kathmarval @Pouldeau61 @LummHandy @SariellaForever @J

@fnordfinder1 Really🤔 https://t.co/HI87Y0kUVn

@Ladyjustice1312 @MarkWendrich @muumi_tweets @cwitteveen1 @Vortexsh3dding @ToKnowOrNot @Sophia47620374 @HaHaGentherapie @JawamarsMarcus @ing_thegame @PaulGanck @Charlot2409 @vpknerd @Missionmars21 @HansLandman @Singing_BumbleB @Miraloml @JanssenJh @JasperR

@GenFlynn @SMHCS This is unscientific BS . And for your followers, "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials." https://t.co/mEK3iEWhNn

@elonmusk Great! Did you know Ivermectin is ineffective for Covid? https://t.co/8FX3jok7JX

RT @SKDitta: @VigilantFox @RWMaloneMD Is ivermectin effective for COVID-19? Key messages We found no evidence to support the use of #iver…

@VigilantFox @RWMaloneMD Is ivermectin effective for COVID-19? Key messages We found no evidence to support the use of #ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. The evidence base improved slightly in this update, but is still

@green_coaching @backtolife_2023 c19early / ivmmeta are garbage websites meant to disinform people. https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF https://t.co/KKqaSBIX9N

@HarveyWall15 @megynkelly https://t.co/dhsLN8QaH5 Authors' conclusions: Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. The completed studies are smal

@Florenc61436376 @marseille_jeff @raoult_didier @chris_perronne @BonsensOrg Sur ça. Et aussi sur le fait que seule une poignée de pays l’utilise encore. https://t.co/hHJ022kYYZ

@Aldo13979390 @Nicolas28386271 @raoult_didier Votre tweet commence mal : l’ivermectine est inefficace pour soigner le Covid. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r

@Albert36979477 @JimDoubleYou1 @guill2001 @raoult_didier Voilà une vraie meta, c’est Cochrane, LA référence mondiale des meta analyses https://t.co/GYdldk680i

@KaiserCut @factionprosa75 @jojoda3755 @SHomburg @pfizer @pfizer_de Nochmals, all diese Studien hatten Limitierungen. Lesen Sie dazu die Cochrane Metastudie. Indien hat zum Beispiel nachdem es Ivermectin verwendet hat, dies rückgängig gemacht, da kein Nutz

@insins31544458 @brunoblum @ProfitJim @raoult_didier https://t.co/TzBLy2bBCM cela dit cochrane s’est chargé de faire le taf. Je suppose que ça n’ira pas de toutes façons.

@vicky_falls @AlastairMcA30 @stkirsch "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19" https://t.co/6x9xgq7chr

@Totof7878 @UsrrDrkon @arnaud_petitpas @CaudeHenrion @Thom_astro https://t.co/B2XPhKVe29

@Vieux_Rhone @CongasMaracas @ankou1976 @CananHenri @StevePascolo @CaudeHenrion Source : Cochrane. https://t.co/jhfu38zRZz

@Darusssia1 @CAndre51 @DrBrunoGino https://t.co/3oodTAEJDd

@mpc_xetts @VigilantFox @drpaulmarik1 Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/8FX3jok7JX

@InquizitiveOne @pianomancal @dorissykessr @VigilantFox @PierreKory https://t.co/6I7ZNq7AZX

@GeorgeFareed2 @btysonmd @EduEngineer @FLSurgeonGen @P_McCulloughMD "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection" https://t.co/X8AAotmI2N

@MartindeChamp @HugonetX Il n'y a plus aucun doute sur l'efficacité de l'ivermectine associée à un antibio contre le covid ... https://t.co/7JPSGb9VJh https://t.co/BarnpZWUfA

RT @MaddisonTaite: @corybernardi Currently, the FDA and Cochrane Institute disagree with you. https://t.co/JhOZyACuiY https://t.co/PGMEBxb…

@corybernardi Currently, the FDA and Cochrane Institute disagree with you. https://t.co/JhOZyACuiY https://t.co/PGMEBxbwcR https://t.co/MlFVkTlatv

@PierreKory @stkirsch "the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19" https://t.co/6x9xgq7chr

@Ohyeip3m @WipperThomas @Ingo_Arzt @NichtmeinN Ivermectin: https://t.co/H7jxf8MXBw Wir fanden keine Evidenz, die den Einsatz von Ivermectin zur Behandlung von COVID-19 oder Prävention einer COVID-19-Infektion stützt.

@JohnDyer66 @CKellyUAP Ok. Here is the peer reviewed meta analysis of every study. "Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID"https://t.co/9v58KS3Hu

@AminSharaf @WahnSager @NachdenkerOB Your source is nonsense (c19ivm/ivmmeta). https://t.co/dzREIe2g85 https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF https://t.co/ngbJcX13nL

@AminSharaf Bisher kein Nachweis der Wirksamkeit gegen Covid-19. Einige Studien laufen noch. https://t.co/G5qJUkYkPP https://t.co/DlvCreSVie

@Jeanpie04989677 @CSitzenstuhl On peut https://t.co/QZThGL1be8

@DaeminErish @LasseHagman @HattenHelander https://t.co/oBRo2m1hJp Här samlas 31 stora undersökningar. Resultatet är tyvärr att det inte fungerar. Men visst, tron på placeboeffekten kanske kan hjälpa

@DannieldeK @DaanDutch @remcoh @bplusandabit @PvanHouwelingen De hoogste standaard is wat de Cochrane groepen doen. Dat zou je moeten lezen en daaruit komt dat Ivermectine niets doet bij Covid https://t.co/Z9mOYPDaD1

@CKellyUAP An actual review : https://t.co/88O15eGW6e

@Bea_Elisa https://t.co/aTbObkQnRV

@BlakesWort @enielaK @MrPropaganda030 Das wäre der Link, ich hab keine Zeit das gerade alles zu lesen. https://t.co/gXinTJ8Ceb Es gebe dann ja noch diese Analyse https://t.co/vE0B5sr4aS die alles diesbezüglich verneint.

@RickNas95547619 @DiddyPersisted @Chicago1Ray How about a link to multiple types of studies done vis such a small sample of the public. I don't trust shit from Florida. Here is a better wider student with multiple study sorces of data proving once again it

@BlakesWort https://t.co/QNcksLtGbD Studien stehen noch aus. Weiß nicht inwieweit bekannt ist, wie verzweifelt die Lage für MECFS ist. Leute kleben sich zb Nikotinpflaster auf beim geringsten Hinweis auf mgl. Besserung. Das ist nicht Schwurbelei sondern Ve

@JoshWalkos @222doc https://t.co/ZXWSFUf6yz

@222doc @JoshWalkos @stella_immanuel No there isn’t “many more”, relative to the total number of physicians nationwide. You want to know why? Evidence shows ivermectin is not an effective treatment https://t.co/ZXWSFUf6yz

@MDevlinH @Lauwke3 @Lifesabummer1 @goddeketal @tanyalovesbenny https://t.co/xovX1FPETB

@222doc @JoshWalkos https://t.co/ZXWSFUf6yz No therapeutic benefit

@VigilantFox @Plandemic3Movie Quite a large number of trials have now been done and from what I can see almost all say not affective against covid 19. I.e patients had same results/outcome as those on placebo. Here's 2: https://t.co/6fIszfuVmx… https:/

@vinksta87 @VigilantFox @Plandemic3Movie Quite a large number of trials have now been done and from what I can see almost all day ivermectin not affective against covid 19. I.e patients had same results/outcome as those on placebo. Here's 2: https://t.c

@drnathimdladla @MauritzPreller @AlastairMcA30 @maggsnaidu @ShabirMadh @Jay_Naidoo @MarikaSboros @DrAseemMalhotra @TheSecretSarah @SouthAfricanASP Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 https://t.co/N6H1Si6fji

@MauritzPreller @drnathimdladla @AlastairMcA30 @maggsnaidu @ShabirMadh @Jay_Naidoo @MarikaSboros @DrAseemMalhotra @TheSecretSarah @SouthAfricanASP Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19, Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. https:

@Tomarakh @RoyTyrrell1 @ellymelly A Cochrane review aggregates all completed trials of drugs. Here's the recent Ivermectin one: https://t.co/JmD3w97Oaj

@LizHighleyman If an intervention has no evidence it works, we say it is ineffective. For example, we don't say "we haven't proven that ivermectin doesn't work." https://t.co/Dexwsl6UBG

@nbatokcmo @Keggs719 If an intervention has no evidence it works, we say it is ineffective. For example, we don't say "we haven't proven that ivermectin doesn't work." https://t.co/Dexwsl6UBG

So much about about ivermectin Why haven't the manufacturer's of ivermectin conducted research for effectiveness It's been 3 years Here's scientific evidence it doesn't work https://t.co/LllNbJJpYM Too many idiots promoting this shit

@ob_alves @belini @filipe_rafaeli Onde que vocês estão baseando a ideia de que “não há evidência de eficácia”? Vocês sabem que vários estudos relevantes foram deixados de lado dessa análise — o texto que colei, pra quem se deu trabalho de ler, cita alguns.

@VPrasadMDMPH Here’s one: https://t.co/O5asNPLmft

@Potholer54T Good example of the debunking Scott Alexander acts like skeptics don't do. Maybe Alexander should try it, instead of coddling conspiracists in his audience + blaming skeptics for people's choice to go further into conspiracism. https://t.co/

@ryha33 @Gudetube @jeanna_weed @drsiyabmd No I posted this in reply to you

@ThomeCampo Tja, manchmal zeigt sich, wieso Schauspieler bei ihrem Fach bleiben sollten.🤗 https://t.co/6aWG6pnI4F https://t.co/3so1EXTD0y

RT @Trumpbangskids: @Cpt_Fantabulous @Monkie6669 @ProtektorThe @David4677484957 @lord_flavor @RogueHeadChef @_HughJasole_ @perinejennifer5…

@ryha33 @jeanna_weed @drsiyabmd https://t.co/mAwn76cL5k

@hari_seeblick @ef_tschi @BirgitHebein @HDobral https://t.co/TClwgrIff1

RT @AtomsksSanakan: @C_Kavanagh Scott Alexander also coddles his contrarian audience by misrepresenting what academia effectively communica…

@C_Kavanagh Scott Alexander also coddles his contrarian audience by misrepresenting what academia effectively communicated https://t.co/oFt0w980z1 https://t.co/FNFPC74b1L https://t.co/HFg78DYvjE https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.c

@VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/Ly5C6UWD92

@redundanthuman @ajpadgett @SteveBarclay It just doesn't work with Covid19 unfortunately ☹️ https://t.co/907lTo148R

@CKellyUAP https://t.co/H8ZRXxvqsn

@OzraeliAvi https://t.co/H8ZRXxvqsn

@kecg1234 @DrHorwitz @frizenio @kevinnbass @RWMaloneMD @PierreKory …. already been carried out, show no benefit whatsoever. https://t.co/XyvWg9mc2Q

@davidebrady @soxthewavingcat @thecoastguy Nice link, shows how good #Ivermectin is for live parasites, given that was written in 2011 you're not doing very well, are you ? Here look at some recent and up-to-date science....Enjoy 😉 https://t.co/lwB9LTjPv