@vivi_lars https://t.co/jRJmVgiNTd Fra mars 2024: «We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. The evidence base improved slightly in this update, but is still limited.»
@TimTrippDesign @morphnz68 @Covid19Critical This might interest you. And no, I do not want to discuss it or answer any questions on it. When the results of the review you've screenshotted are in, I'd be grateful if you'd let me know. TIA https://t.co/gpdFI
@jampachoetso @kaeferboeck Nachweis für ihre Behauptungen? Das sind die Fakten dazu ->> https://t.co/UEnqD2eWNx
@kaeferboeck https://t.co/UEnqD2eWNx “Wir fanden keine Evidenz, die den Einsatz von Ivermectin zur Behandlung von COVID-19 oder Prävention einer COVID-19-Infektion stützt. Die Evidenzbasis hat sich in dieser Aktualisierung leicht verbessert, ist aber im
RT @bluemaster100: @WeiseFranklin Resultado recente (8/03/24) da meta-análise sobre Ivermectina e Covid, feita pela organização Cochrane c/…
@UOLNoticias Link do estudo chinelão que embasa essa matéria chinelona... Não perca a "pérola" chamada de "conclusão dos autores"... https://t.co/OxNITRtr9H
@smilodonbhz @MarceloAlv16199 @samuelborellipr @AndreGA_Pe Parabéns mano a unica "fonte" q vc mandou é de um link q não funciona ksksks Vou te ajudar: https://t.co/EZXa2TmhZp https://t.co/2P4gi1uI45
@_M0rph3us__ @sartori_caio @FillipePB @Pastor_RedPill @UOLNoticias @artemisagauche https://t.co/RvfQZJn9yQ Atualizado Novamente Experiência própria não serve como parâmetro Seguindo seu argumento Olavo de Carvalho testou a teoria Bolsonarista... Qual foi o
@WeiseFranklin Resultado recente (8/03/24) da meta-análise sobre Ivermectina e Covid, feita pela organização Cochrane c/ experimentos RTC, padrão ouro da evidência médica: não encontraram evidências para suportar o uso da ivermectina para tratar ou preveni
@Leandro11783224 @DrBrunoGino Ler artigos e acompanhar as evidências científicas não é seu forte, né, campeão? Hahahahahhahaha https://t.co/0QgTeafKu5
@MWidcoq @lonnibesancon @RogezVeronique Bon je viens de prendre le temps de lire ça et de me renseigner. 1/Les captures ne disent en rien que c'est le remède le plus sûr d'ailleurs lisez bien le dernier paragraphe... 2/ L'ivermectine ne semble pas du tout
@unzensuriert Soso, das steht also in euren Studien... Vielleicht könntet ihr auch eine verlinken😅. Echte Studien zeigen nach wie vor das Gegenteil... https://t.co/qwpr38Ua4B
@xAlphaWarriorx @DrJudyAMikovits COVID-19 is caused by SARS-CoV-2, a natural coronavirus from animal to human spillover. Ivermectin is anti-parasitic and not anti-viral against SARS-CoV-2. Ivermectin failed clinical trials with saline placebo and has not b
@hfortiermtl @RobertM72103719 @AlastairMcA30 So non-expert who has no idea how to evaluate research + does the usual conspiracist ranting about "sheep": Why is your link peddling "https://t.co/1ku08ICy0Z" like it's credible? https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https
Por cierto, la información más reciente que encontré fue del pasado 8 de Marzo Y dice que no hay evidencia de que la Ivermectina funcione más allá del efecto placebo https://t.co/VEvb3iAi7E
Ist #Ivermectin bei #COVID19 wirksam? Diese Frage sorgte in der Pandemie für große Aufregung. Dieses Evidenz-Update zeigt erneut: Es gibt keine belastbare Evidenz, die den Einsatz des Entwurmungsmittels zur Behandlung oder Prävention von COVID-19 stützt. h
@GabyCuevas @HectorRossete @AdrianaDavilaF Eso es una abierta mentira: https://t.co/24nASinxCl
@WotsOnInfo @CraigKellyPHON But it’s not my opinion https://t.co/JOiRe19iPT
@WiscguyNE @AlastairMcA30 Stop peddling long-debunked disinformation websites. https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF https://t.co/xBZStjAHAb https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF https://t.co/4gjMJkOfYM
@PeterM79899 @MIKKEL_MH Ivermectin fx virker ikke. https://t.co/4rbA0ZZR5l
@wodie1776 @EdKrassen @LauraLoomer lawsuit is meaningless (forum shopping). 99% of the medical community will not prescribe ivermectin to treat covid because it’s dangerous and doesn’t work according to every legitimate double blind study. https://t.co/6wk
@atom_jarvis @DonniSlater @Justher48482361 @smalls2672 Oh my, you deliberately tried (again) to distort my point into something else. How about primary treatment for GSW? https://t.co/iuTzXNFLLT https://t.co/Yr8k3s9D1P https://t.co/25j6BpyTWc https://t.co
@WearyTraveler_0 Jednako ne djeluje tada i sada. Naprosto, ne djeluje na Covidu. I dalje ne znam zašto ljude privlači nešto što ne djeluje, a ne nešto što djeluje kao Paxlovid. https://t.co/CKe1L0K2OQ
@RemondAlex4 @Franck20270 @GuisonJerome @BFMTV @CNEWS @RTLFrance @Europe1 En effet je n'ai rien trouvé sur le site de la FDA. L'effet de cette molécule est très modeste... https://t.co/jsnr5RUj5C https://t.co/KgejmBYqad
@FactsAreGood @momentomoriDM @thewhitewolf51 @sjs856 Their source is nonsense, as you likely already knew. https://t.co/3vDsoIrBhs https://t.co/QmXgezQopa
@momentomoriDM @SolNataMD Re: "Here is the source of the data. https://t.co/6LtVRDkAPU" Peddle that non-peer-reviewed disinformation website somewhere else, troll. https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4T
@MdBreathe @JoeTalkShow No it does not. https://t.co/JyN5BEwSeq
@fvd1242 @Porcupine666 @BertKrale @thierrybaudet @telegraaf Wetenschap verteld trouwens heel wat anders. En nee, de rechter besliste dat ook niet. maar aangezien jij geen bron hebt.... https://t.co/JyN5BEwSeq
@Zachariahskylab @chappellmoan @Susan4Freedom @Amber666Angel @raybak92 @singingsox Here is a meta study that shows no evidence. Because again the studies that "show evidence" are heavily contaminated with biases. https://t.co/Tt2kac0J8k
@WeRthePatriots @JohnGri08659220 @KatyTalento @MdBreathe Cochrane agreed with Oxford: https://t.co/x0ntUHG4sW https://t.co/ch4BnW5LYp
@johnsilvestrone @LoriDirtweed @RobertKennedyJr No, you're posting old research that is completely incorrect and widely debunked. Stick to reputable sources, not Kory who is paid to sell ivermectin. He's a pharma shill. Don't listen to pharma shills. htt
@johnsilvestrone @LoriDirtweed @RobertKennedyJr If you want an objective meta study, there are many who aren't shills like Kory. He's paid by the ivermectin manufacturer. That's a fact. https://t.co/5z79dpqMJB https://t.co/U0B8g4xPur
@vivi_lars Heldigvis fungerer ikke ivermectin. https://t.co/8bQO5vMIYe
@newworldnothanx @NFSC88JJ @DC_Draino Also, it doesn’t work. https://t.co/0n4XA2Ecmy
RT @LizardoGramcko: La ivermectina te deja el colon libre de parásitos ‼️🤔 #LizNews https://t.co/V2IigNiuYu
La ivermectina te deja el colon libre de parásitos ‼️🤔 #LizNews https://t.co/V2IigNiuYu
@smith_john55 @BreezerGalway @cappsie 1) Your source is nonsense. 2) You're moving the goalposts away from your failed claims on veterinary formulations of ivermectin poisoning people. https://t.co/GcPEefbc4k https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtX
@MdBreathe BS. Very latest from Cochrane.. https://t.co/T5mAjxJIRU
@ScampoloMUC @LimesAndMangos @SHomburg Wird auch bei Menschen eingesetzt, aber nicht gegen Covid-19. https://t.co/a1wxnNUyyD
@LimesAndMangos @SHomburg Ivermectin ist ein Mittel zur Behandlung von Parasiten. Es gibt keinen Nachweis, dass Ivermectin gegen Covid-19 hilft. https://t.co/a1wxnNUyyD
@Rubiosinfiltro @AnaVronsky Acá hay una fuente seria. https://t.co/EOG0z3wDwA
@Time4Nuremburg2 @jomay1717 @sandypuke @BenIrvineAuthor Ivermectin. Horse dewormer and anti-parasitical. Good safety profile so as long as you're taking the human stuff it shouldn't do you any harm, however there is little evidence it actually helps: https
@SolNataMD "we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19... the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized
@Patrickkerby58 @ScottAdamsSays Your anecdotal evidence doesn't even match the claims of those who flog Ivermectin to gullible Libertarian bed wetters. No reputable study or country (eg India) that tried it supports your old wives' tale. Here's Cochrane,
@LooogarJ @VigilantFox @TuckerCarlson Yes, a bunch of quacks preying on gullible rubes. It doesn't work. https://t.co/x0ntUHG4sW
@CovidAnalysis @GidMK @iseefourlights @StrohJulian Disinformation websites like your's fall so far below basic academic standards that it's almost laughable anyone still falls for your site. https://t.co/a4Q4CDGiZw https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M
@vellukes @ER_Korhola E-R on kiljusirkuksen tunnetuimpia tinahattuja. Tuskin luopuu tinaisesta kruunustaan ihan helpolla. https://t.co/8HkEZHTnvm
Ei edelleenkään ole mitään tutkimusnäyttöä siitä, että ivermektiinistä olisi mitään hyötyä covid-infektion hoidossa. https://t.co/dyrLpC6doz https://t.co/a4y71PrX5J
@MorningInUSA123 @TheChiefNerd @liz_churchill10 Ivermectin studies show no C-19 protection https://t.co/EWgh4gcb9x https://t.co/ZzhsQJlBaa — https://t.co/rGWvR1JTYd https://t.co/CeVPQgdrzD — https://t.co/r4N6IgCfrz https://t.co/E8CrY7kgvO https://t.co/
@BenMarble_MD Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin are not COVID-19 treatments. The optimal dosage for Ivermectin to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 in the body would kill the person. https://t.co/blI8Iorbiy
@VigilantFox Complete and utter bullshit. Ivermectin has been proven worthless against Covid, in EVERY reputable study. And please, Pierre Kory is a fraud, and you know it. https://t.co/x0ntUHG4sW
@DLHay @MRobertsQLD 😂😂🤣Ahhh the old do your research refrain from the unqualified. You know how many times I have heard that? Tell me - what data do you have that is better than a Cochrane meta analysis? https://t.co/7H670cdLZ9
@frckchn @Tim_Roehn "Wir fanden keine Evidenz, die den Einsatz von Ivermectin zur Behandlung von COVID-19 oder Prävention einer COVID-19-Infektion stützt." https://t.co/zgEXx0Tb4y
@NarfGb @Kessy1972die2 @SHomburg @punktpreradovic @docbrandenburg @rosenbusch_ Dann gibt es noch diesen Cochrane-Review: https://t.co/1LF8VyNNc4 Obwohl an sich Cochrane-Fan, sehe ich diesen Artikel mit sehr gemischten Gefühlen. Denn die haben unterwegs das
@thomasvanagt @vooruit_nu Blijft staan. Geen evidentie. https://t.co/KfbhRKC7FQ Wel evidentie dat schoolsluitingen vele neveneffecten hebben vr kinderen. Vrij simpel eigenlijk.
@Mayk_vehemente @AlexGnarcia Incorrect again. https://t.co/sN2Sr6wj6t
@Canal_do_Void Artigo da UFOP: https://t.co/YG7T6AVq1G Artigo da Cochrane postado em 2022: https://t.co/diOpu4ZqZF Próprio laboratório da Ivermectina dizendo que não existe evidência (em 2021): https://t.co/zifE23FWWp
@treefern73 @doctor_oxford @gabyhinsliff I’m sorry but that is factually wrong, the evidence does not support these therapies. https://t.co/uFgDOm9FDN https://t.co/ilbO4JISiJ
@DanSKeenan @DiedSuddenly_ It's not effective. https://t.co/yxqSioBf1r
@LangostaReborn @DoctoraPrego Acá tienes muchas pruebas, hasta del Colegio Médico del Perú que prohibió su uso pq NO hacia nada contra el Covid. Ahora, crees en los Chemtrails? Pregunta simple https://t.co/D0bQoYZ3A0 https://t.co/TSnIksAiZW bba-covid-19
@hate_eyeNerds @Trey_00001 @HillaryClinton Here's the meta analysis of 14 studies of ivermectin's efficacy for covid. https://t.co/FgiEB8KPsJ
@lorraine_dubuis @CarreHarold @Fraslin Toutes les études sérieuses démontrent l'inefficacité complète de cette molécule. https://t.co/x8piH8Zbt5
@JStraub84870867 @raider_lee @daniel_d223 @jonathanstea You can find the full systematic review here, and it's not terribly favorable to ivermectin's efficacy: https://t.co/9VPHxa2dl6