@joesanders33 @001B_Betty @Marco_Piani No one takes you seriously. You're just being used for lulz, and as an object lesson in dishonest denialism. You have no more ability to admit to what the evidence shows than a flat Earther does. https://t.co/FtI0tO
@joesanders33 @PoeBrianL @plagueprose Oh, the vaccine denialist was also a non-expert ivermectin fan. How unsurprising. https://t.co/IVG6t95M5b Cochrane dealt with that: https://t.co/vQofadiEi4 https://t.co/FtI0tOZrOD https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.
@patriotsdghtr @CKellyUAP Here is some real science for u. Enjoy.
RT @jason_willz1: @GraduatedBen Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's https://t.co/1XAXFLzlN7 https://t.co…
RT @jason_willz1: @GraduatedBen Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's https://t.co/1XAXFLzlN7 https://t.co…
RT @jason_willz1: @GraduatedBen Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's https://t.co/1XAXFLzlN7 https://t.co…
@PierreKory
RT @jason_willz1: @GraduatedBen Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's https://t.co/1XAXFLzlN7 https://t.co…
RT @jason_willz1: @GraduatedBen Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's https://t.co/1XAXFLzlN7 https://t.co…
RT @jason_willz1: @GraduatedBen Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's https://t.co/1XAXFLzlN7 https://t.co…
@GidMK @AlbertUgh @TheSGEM @CaulfieldTim @ScienceUpFirst @SajjadFazel @KrishanaSankar @drkiki @RealDoctorMike @bunsenbernerbmd @StanKutcher @RyanMarino @cochranecollab Again, for posterity: Have the non-expert ivermectin fans been peddling another conferen
@AlastairMcA30 For posterity: Have the non-expert ivermectin fans posted about another conference abstract yet? https://t.co/lCBc22J5W8 https://t.co/173oqole2m https://t.co/NjMPRtgtuD https://t.co/88eW8XiOkG
@JamesMc18758088 @AprilHunter @nowoolovreyz @RachelNotley @elonmusk You're unlikely to get through to the non-expert ivermectin fans. They're a lost cause, deep in their conspiracism + denialism. https://t.co/173oqole2m https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t
@phillyharper @jsm2334 @dr_jon_l Also, non-expert conspiracists: Ivermectin doesn't work for SARS-CoV-2. https://t.co/pZb82UlTgx https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/kj6j6gHaQd
RT @jason_willz1: @browt1971 @DiedSuddenly_ Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's…
RT @rt7683: @gzxyience @davideyoungmd @ColigorNL @robinmonotti ivm is ineffective based on RCT's https://t.co/81N0hIL3Fd https://t.co/7kV5E…
@FBreject1 @GrumpyOldDoc @Doctor_Eric_B Random screenshots from who knows what studies, at least one of which predates covid by more than 5 years? LMFAO. https://t.co/tdkwq0vkot
RT @jason_willz1: @browt1971 @DiedSuddenly_ Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's…
@Baskerville_13 @Ravarora1 @C_Kavanagh That's nice, non-expert ivermectin fan + conspiracist theorist. Informed non-paranoid adults are talking. 😉 https://t.co/rtTmSrQE0l https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/VCi2m2M3Ls
RT @jason_willz1: @browt1971 @DiedSuddenly_ Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's…
RT @jason_willz1: @browt1971 @DiedSuddenly_ Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's…
RT @jason_willz1: @browt1971 @DiedSuddenly_ Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's…
@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright I'm fine citing peer-reviewed published evidence from mainstream experts, instead of pretending I know better than them. Same thing I did on ivermectin, which is why I didn't screw up as utterly as you did. https://t.co
@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright Probably exactly how you were behaving when people told you wrong about ivermectin. So confident you knew better than experts on that, yet so wrong... https://t.co/173oqokGcO "currently the zoonosis hypothesis has the
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @Debunk_the_Funk @factbid Again, we're not dealing with sensible people here. They're driven by the same sort of evide…
@stuartjdneil For posterity: Ivermectin didn't work for SARS-CoV-2, despite many lab leak conspiracists + their ilk claiming otherwise. https://t.co/rjAq4sHbQJ https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/PuO8gemChm https://t.co/afwr5liTBE
@Debunk_the_Funk @factbid Again, we're not dealing with sensible people here. They're driven by the same sort of evidence-free denialist paranoia that led them into vaccine denialism, lab leak conspiracism, ivermectin fandom, etc. https://t.co/173oqokGcO
@Debunk_the_Funk @factbid You're not going to get through to him, as you likely know. He's a non-expert contrarian conspiracist with no idea how to evaluate published evidence. He just goes with whatever pre-determined narrative suits his paranoia biases
@APPCPenn Would be telling to see how many of them also accept vaccine denialism on COVID-19 vaccines, that hydroxychloroquine works, that SARS-CoV-2 leaked from a lab, etc. In other words, crank magnetism: https://t.co/cURfACSR3B https://t.co/173oqokGcO
@veryvirology You also should really update your priors regarding ivermectin and covid at this point. If for no other reason than the sake of your legitimacy. https://t.co/jZ6v1e1ikL https://t.co/l35RZnHk9C
@sasha_latypova @PodcastBill @GidMK Re: "Covid agent is likely a chemical poisoning substance (chemical weapon, possibly including synthetic bio-toxin features, could also have radiological features [...])." https://t.co/a4AhhgPULd 😑 Zelenko-esque https
@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright You mean your fellow non-expert contrarian who, as on ivermectin, had to catch up to where the experts were long before he was? Maybe read published papers from experts next time, instead of daft conspiracy theory blogs.
@Sijwill @SudarshanChate2 @chrischirp @TravellingTabby Re: "Ivermectin works against it." https://t.co/tbqEIyYOEu For posterity: No it didn't, anymore than lab leak conspiracists were right, as per crank magnetism. https://t.co/ufIywnXLIa https://t.co/xv
RT @jason_willz1: @marybethpf ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on randomized controlled trials https://t.co/1XAXF…
RT @jason_willz1: @marybethpf ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on randomized controlled trials https://t.co/1XAXF…
Im not sure how you accessed the board information but I am calling KBN on Monday to see if you work there. The verification process is for employers. Good Luck
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Canada) Lijing Yan (Duke Kunshan University, China) Charles Young (Capita, UK)
Cochrane Library, or any editorial positions taken by the Editor in Chief in respect of the Cochrane Library. Ginny Barbour, Chair (QUT, Australia) Tracey Koehlmoos, Deputy Chair (Uniformed Services University, USA) Saeed Farooq (Keele University, UK)
Who is the Cochran Library? Cochrane Library Oversight Committee The Cochrane Library Oversight Committee supports the Editor in Chief's editorial independence by providing a mechanism for avoiding or resolving disputes about the content of the
Tell that to all of the people who took it
I guess you have never heard of empirical medicine? ASA action isn't known but it is used and many other drugs
RT @jason_willz1: @marybethpf ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on randomized controlled trials https://t.co/1XAXF…
RT @jason_willz1: @marybethpf ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on randomized controlled trials https://t.co/1XAXF…
RT @jason_willz1: @marybethpf ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on randomized controlled trials https://t.co/1XAXF…
RT @jason_willz1: @marybethpf ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on randomized controlled trials https://t.co/1XAXF…
@VigilantFox Ivermectin is not effective for treating COVID-19, randomized controlled trials have made this fairly clear: 1. https://t.co/UHwr52rQ9g (RCT) 2. https://t.co/0EMoA6flPG (RCT) 3. https://t.co/q06pSUADpm (RCT) 4. https://t.co/JdmpjHwMdd (cochran
@filipe_rafaeli @CureusInc For a meta analysis, Popp et al's in Cochrane is far better than an anonymous and absurdly biased pseudoscientific website https://t.co/0SETIlJwwM
@filipe_rafaeli @gtuckerkellogg @CureusInc Why are you still peddling that long-debunked disinformation website, instead of competently done meta-analyses? https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 ht
@mariobi2000 @Alexa2B74 @JulienFort4bis @MicrobiomDigest @SciReports @raoult_didier @IHU_Marseille @SmutClyde Attention de ne pas trop jouer avec les synthèses de Cochrane, car on en trouve pleins d'autres qui montrent en autre que: l'ivermectine ne fonct
@trillionofcells @Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright You + your fellow non-expert ivermectin lad and vaccine denialist can continue mumbling to each another in your paranoid conspiracy theories. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/3D6Bw4Q7xc
@BarryESharp @shallit43 @gtuckerkellogg @CureusInc You're incapable of honest discussion. All you have is spamming conspiracism to evade published evidence that shows you're wrong (+ which you don't how to evaluate), while you show you don't grasp concept
RT @BarryESharp: Dearest Jason Whether we can now establish that Ivermectin does or does not work against “Covid,” is irrelevant. It is t…
@Sijwill @valdesignasid @Tigress21 @deNutrients @CensoredThinker Re: "So did they take it ?" https://t.co/ElPmxEAJoS You're hopeless, ivermectin lad. 🙄 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/GotyBVlFxj https://t.co/cS1FVdYcKI
RT @jason_willz1: @BarryESharp @kt9623670 @rt7683 Randomized controlled trials placebo controlled determine ivermectin has no efficacy to t…
Dearest Jason Whether we can now establish that Ivermectin does or does not work against “Covid,” is irrelevant. It is the damage and harm that people like you caused to the medical community and science as a whole that is at stake. The Surgisphere Fra
RT @jason_willz1: @BarryESharp @kt9623670 @rt7683 Randomized controlled trials placebo controlled determine ivermectin has no efficacy to t…
RT @jason_willz1: @BarryESharp @kt9623670 @rt7683 Randomized controlled trials placebo controlled determine ivermectin has no efficacy to t…
@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright Hello, non-expert conspiracist who peddles COVID-19 disinformation over + over again. "Ivermectin works against it." https://t.co/X2qvS6Ha63 https://t.co/xvyZIYnTP8 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/4sMqhWlRPz
@Shirl3yBell @DeborahGyapong @DrTedros https://t.co/70V4XmfG1g Evidence (albeit not the strongest) shows no significant benefit of ivermectin
@JohnBoweActor @HFFurnitureUK @RishiSunak @SteveBarclay Really John, You should know better than that. Most trusted source of evidence is Cochrane https://t.co/zqBumtOWy6 On the plus side at least it does not cause additional harms like HCQ. Can you expla
@marc_g_wathelet @ImmunoGangsta @Debunk_the_Funk @BretWeinstein I'm right about the two of you being wrong on ivermectin, just like so many of your fellow non-expert vaccine denialists were. Y'all just leap onto the bandwagon of whatever contrarian conspi
@ImmunoGangsta @Debunk_the_Funk @DopplerEffect93 @SaltaoVladimir @ENirenberg @weldeiry @DravenS17 @Jikkyleaks @gorskon And further confirmation that the Venn diagram of non-expert ivermectin fans + vaccine denialists is close to a circle. https://t.co/IVG
@JR4_Truth @Debunk_the_Funk @thereal_truther @Standup__Man @katwrappah @USMortality @JeromeAdamsMD @joshg99 You're still just making stuff up in bad faith, with no evidence. You're a disingenuous conspiracy theorist who pretends to know about science topi
@stkirsch @RogerSeheult Science! I never make anything up, Steve. https://t.co/6sWJV3sPNl
@scotub @gtuckerkellogg Knee-jerk contrarianism + conspiracism is tedious, whether on ivermectin, a supposed lab leak, etc. https://t.co/DBd8pJPP2y https://t.co/KD0yIdD1n4 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/AeY0IcX8dP
RT @thereal_truther: @JosephFraiman @dr_jon_l Ivermectin works great for parasites, not for COVID-19. Countless RCT's confirm lack of effic…
@JosephFraiman @dr_jon_l @doritmi Why not read the high-quality RCTs that show no benefit? Do you find the Cochrane review low quality? https://t.co/6sWJV3sPNl
RT @thereal_truther: @JosephFraiman @dr_jon_l Ivermectin works great for parasites, not for COVID-19. Countless RCT's confirm lack of effic…
RT @thereal_truther: @JosephFraiman @dr_jon_l Ivermectin works great for parasites, not for COVID-19. Countless RCT's confirm lack of effic…
RT @thereal_truther: @JosephFraiman @dr_jon_l Ivermectin works great for parasites, not for COVID-19. Countless RCT's confirm lack of effic…
RT @thereal_truther: @JosephFraiman @dr_jon_l Ivermectin works great for parasites, not for COVID-19. Countless RCT's confirm lack of effic…
RT @thereal_truther: @JosephFraiman @dr_jon_l Ivermectin works great for parasites, not for COVID-19. Countless RCT's confirm lack of effic…
RT @thereal_truther: @JosephFraiman @dr_jon_l Ivermectin works great for parasites, not for COVID-19. Countless RCT's confirm lack of effic…
RT @thereal_truther: @JosephFraiman @dr_jon_l Ivermectin works great for parasites, not for COVID-19. Countless RCT's confirm lack of effic…
@JosephFraiman @dr_jon_l Ivermectin works great for parasites, not for COVID-19. Countless RCT's confirm lack of efficacy for COVID-19. https://t.co/ZAdg72caow https://t.co/xWS6mQEbmv https://t.co/mPcxyGsxuL https://t.co/8Ao4GMkJc9 https://t.co/W8i7bw
世界的に一致した見解
@HeideckeKu45716 @Therealfootdoc @catturd2 Surely a “scholar” as yourself didn’t mean to share that garbage publication. Let me help you out with a Cochran review. You’re welcome, stupid fuck. https://t.co/UzQdyHvYW6
@uni_2030 わしからの回答はこれな。 https://t.co/Yl08sgtXcG イベルメクチンは効かない。
RT @Calcijp: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/Yl08sgtpn8 For outpatients, there is currently low- to high-cer…
RT @Calcijp: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/Yl08sgtpn8 For outpatients, there is currently low- to high-cer…
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/Yl08sgtpn8 For outpatients, there is currently low- to high-certainty evidence that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for people with COVID-19.
@CKellyUAP Please quit posting bull5hit from this debunked website, FFS. https://t.co/IDXCDSGxgX
@gtuckerkellogg @AesBrah @PierreKory @Johnincarlisle @jordanbpeterson Their ideologically-motivated double standard is quite obvious. They'll cite a conference abstract on an observational study with a weak design, but willfully ignore an abstract of a me
@xxloulou00 @PGrasarevic @AmyBu3 Wenn sie Behauptungen aufstellen, sollten sie diese Belegen können, sonst kann diesen ohne Beleg widersprochen werden. Wenn sie allerdings Belege vorbringen, zwingen sie die Gegenseite dazu auch Belege vorzulegen: https://t
@TxUnmask @Awithonelison @ChuckMastan @Bankersbonus1 @SwaledaleMutton @TheChiefNerd @TakeWeightOffMD Why do you peddle a meta-analysis containing fraudulent data + with an 'expression of concern'? https://t.co/173oqokGcO "Meta-analyses do not establish i
@gorskon @GrumpyOldDoc @tenebra99 @vpknerd @weldeiry @t1pnl So Makis us on the ivermectin grift as well. https://t.co/2lyhbDLaHC How unsurprising. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/SeOtEkh0tI
RT @CommunicativeSu: @VigilantFox Ivermectin has efficacy in treating parasitic infections. Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID-19 ba…
RT @CommunicativeSu: @VigilantFox Ivermectin has efficacy in treating parasitic infections. Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID-19 ba…
@Debunk_the_Funk @real_seeking @weldeiry @gorskon @md_wallach @ImmunoGangsta @DravenS17 @Jikkyleaks @P_J_Buckhaults You're not going to get through to that troll, as you likely know. They're still pretending ivermectin works, for example. They're just a n
@LynkLuv @VigilantFox Doesn't work in vivo, as shown in RCTs https://t.co/hhw7UayJMr
Comparing 2012 investigation into ivermectin to inhibit replication of flavivirus as "well-tolerated" and therefore not needing expensive trials with the amount of work going in here: https://t.co/OZTsz8mbeW with 2018 causes of failure in trials: https://t