@kellywind @_everythingism @hypoautonomic @emilyakopp @flodebarre @MoNscience You realize on that thread you illustrated my point about distrust of noted experts/authorities, right? You can drop the conspiracism now. The FDA was correct; ivermectin isn't
@kellywind @hypoautonomic @emilyakopp @flodebarre @_everythingism @MoNscience There is a lot of interesting overlap, though, between non-expert conspiracist proponents of ivermectin (or hydroxychloroquine) vs. non-expert lab leak conspiracists. Crank magn
@Theo_TJ_Jordan @past_is_future You're not credible, non-expert conspiracist. And science is not about live discussions with disingenuous denialists like you. It's about published evidence evaluated by competent people (so not you). https://t.co/ds8yBJ3s
@BrainuserM6086 @HopeRising19 you'd think so, but actually there is science behind it, it competes with covid to bind to cells. https://t.co/S8EI9hOnVt
@AndyMLinn @past_is_future ...says the non-expert lab leak conspiracist + ideologically-motivated contrarian whose almost the perfect embodiment of what Jacobs aptly complains about. https://t.co/BbzXoiXLHV https://t.co/R8JzeiWdTq https://t.co/173oqokGcO
RT @JuanR_Salgueiro: La charlatanería sigue hablando de la ivermectina en pleno 2024 para tratamiento de COVID. Ivermectina NO está recomen…
RT @JuanR_Salgueiro: La charlatanería sigue hablando de la ivermectina en pleno 2024 para tratamiento de COVID. Ivermectina NO está recomen…
RT @JuanR_Salgueiro: La charlatanería sigue hablando de la ivermectina en pleno 2024 para tratamiento de COVID. Ivermectina NO está recomen…
RT @JuanR_Salgueiro: La charlatanería sigue hablando de la ivermectina en pleno 2024 para tratamiento de COVID. Ivermectina NO está recomen…
La charlatanería sigue hablando de la ivermectina en pleno 2024 para tratamiento de COVID. Ivermectina NO está recomendada para tratar COVID: https://t.co/BZx1rFuQ5z La evidencia a favor de la ivermectina ha sido revisada y desestimada por metaestudios: ht
@agriprof @Tedthekelpie @UndaSthnXiStand @stationmum101 Additionally, if you can show me where there is a label claim from a company for ivermectin against COVID I would appreciate it. Unlikely to happen with current research showing it doesn't work https:
@HighCarbAbs @GidMK It was extremely difficult to get a positive meta-analysis peer published. Negative meta no problem to publish. Comments at ivmmeta regarding Popp published negative Cochrane meta.. https://t.co/jLTEKXvW79 https://t.co/nQ8gbdKsfn Popp
@landryphilippe3 @Boucharel7 @Pauline6915 @Fraslin Moi j’ai ça https://t.co/I1OmHrExKN Cochrane, plus de 100 études, efficacité au mieux incertaine.
@AndyMLinn @_everythingism @bluejonn @stuartjdneil @sshole Nothing is owed to a lazy conspiracist who'd rather make up excuses to pretend ivermectin works, rather than defer to the evidence-based consensus of informed experts or read the published evidence
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @AndyMLinn @_everythingism @bluejonn @stuartjdneil @sshole You can't honestly + competently addressed published evidenc…
@AndyMLinn @_everythingism @bluejonn @stuartjdneil @sshole You can't honestly + competently addressed published evidence, leading you to be misled on lab leak in the same way you were misled on ivermectin. You're simply a non-expert troll + conspiracist,
@dwhanna12 @johnson_ja10455 @GoBills2022 @BrettKollmann @Bease11 https://t.co/ktrpQvjzXw My source is actually from the same website as your’s, except that this one has 10 authors (versus the 1 of your’s at least from what I could find since you didn’t pr
@MelFarnwalt @jasondeandc Sorry that’s this study btw, meant to link it. https://t.co/DH8JjR6vZL
@gorskon Quick reminder that Arora either has no idea how to recognize credible sources on COVID-19-related topics, or he's actively disinforming / JAQing off. https://t.co/IKoitWqk8d https://t.co/65IHDC28H1 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/JKRYeYsNr
@ArthurSwindel @masking__mama @RisingSekhmet And here's a whole bunch more morons. https://t.co/7XOSQOJkk0
@Nicole_wren01 @svallers @ChristyDanFan @cmoncnt You really know nothing about this subject. You can see this Vigilant Fox source is an anonymous front for Pierre Kory. Both this source and the meta cower behind anonymity. When you examine, it's fraudulent
@goddeketal Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID based on randomized controlled trials. The studies that did show benefit were either retracted or observational https://t.co/kjbaL6GjNY
@PierreKory Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID based on randomized controlled trials. The studies that did show benefit were either retracted or observational... https://t.co/irl3eYqnEY
@theShakinRoom @TheGr3atReset @mpc_xetts @Heatherjaney1 @sophiadahl1 Here's a cochrane review. https://t.co/FMNVaPExfx
@jan_caron @MarionKoopmans @Ecraid Of deze hele grote studie op Cochrane. https://t.co/tz42whz2fW
@jan_caron @MarionKoopmans @Ecraid Ah, ik heb een meta studie gevonden waar deze Japanse studie in is opgenomen. https://t.co/WbXBlZxPmE
@insins31544458 @Nico_Klus @rvandenhaak @Raiser2001 @ArtsenC If you claim bias, you will have to prove it for all dozens of studies that have been done about the efficacy of IVM. About preventing: "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for
@IanCopeland5 I like the Cochrane review better, but only because the title is just sketch enough, it could suck the QCumbers in, and they might read it/learn something. Too optimistic? Yah, probably. https://t.co/C2NBrWYVHV
@Maestermagoo @CCSDMaskUp ...says the non-expert ivermectin fan + contrarian conspiracist who disagrees with informed experts whenever it suits their baseless paranoia. https://t.co/1DYfd2nI39 https://t.co/8ny9jl2hRo https://t.co/8xVP6ZF07F https://t.co/
@JohntheLyricist @TheGoatofMPVs Funny how it "... inhibits the replication of viruses in vitro..." https://t.co/RoHgzmlsIS
@VigilantFox This claim is baseless. Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat COVID based on randomized controlled trials. There are zero clinical studies proving ivermectin treats vaccine injuries. https://t.co/KwSzjuoWSM https://t.co/lvPF7IdnjM https://t.co
@VigilantFox Post a real source you slimy rat: https://t.co/feR0Pth1S2
@RadiationNat1 @JackPosobiec https://t.co/QqLQjNCwTK and yet it seems you are either misinformed or intentionally spreading lies. Which is it?
@2A_Fighter @1219ddenney @unhealthytruth @JohnKohler3 Let's start here. Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on randomized controlled trials. They are not a "cure" for COVID-19 whatsoever. https://t.co/XfN
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @Jeff_mc2 @Startell3 @TigerlillySusan @ArrestFauxi @Data_logical0 @MonicaGandhi9 @AWokeZombie That's nice, non-expert c…
@Jeff_mc2 @Startell3 @TigerlillySusan @ArrestFauxi @Data_logical0 @MonicaGandhi9 @AWokeZombie That's nice, non-expert conspiracist. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/olT2Nj2z7R
@AntityrantGB @joltdude @CactusAndy @CFlyswatr @DrSusanOliver1 The most widely agreed way to aggregate inference from multiple studies is a systematic review and meta-analysis. The gold standard for such meta-analyses is the Cochrane database. You can see
@catsup821 What experiment? I've not taken any experimental drugs. I'm not eligible for trials, as I have MS. https://t.co/3578eQFDKI
@catsup821 Plenty that confirm your delusions you mean 😉 The other single line responses are all evidence free ranting, so dismissed without response, as is warranted. https://t.co/3578eQFDKI RCTs showing no evidence / discussion. Happy Xmas, cupcake.
@E_nigma1979 @KevinWyoming2 @TimHannan @ballardsigns https://t.co/ZckTSw0MNX https://t.co/YHQ7FrDJDu Updated trials and results. You guys do what you want. Your body your choice. Nobody is going to stop you from taking it, except like, your doctor probab
RT @jason_willz1: @FairDealDave No, anecdotal stories from cranks doesn't trump randomized controlled trials. IVM & HCQ have no efficacy to…
@ghost_magoo @stuartjdneil @natashaloder @emilyakopp Like the public knew ivermectin worked, non-expert ivermectin lad? I think it's time to let it go and just admit that you have no idea how to evaluate evidence + simply fall for whatever contrarian cons
@WePatriot15 Being awarded a Nobel prize for working on *parasites* doesn't mean it worked for *SARS-CoV-2*. Stop trolling. https://t.co/173oqokGcO "Why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19" https://t.co/Re6mi6thGd https://t.co/w5
Ricordiamo almeno 2 lavori (un trial clinico randomizzato pubblicato su NEJM e una revisione Cochrane) del 2022 sulla ivermectina che decretavano la sua inefficacia nel COVID-19: https://t.co/osHiv966RF https://t.co/CO2QneQkPd
@mentju4 @yoshkapundrick @MarionKoopmans Because they got bored with your evidence-free conspiracist antics? I would have blocked your obscenity-hurling denialist trolling long ago, if I didn't have a policy of blocking no one. https://t.co/egKj9WPnfx ht
@Jeff_mc2 @unhealthytruth Ah, so you fall for that sort of garbage source. Ivermectin does not work for SARS-CoV-2. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF https://t.co/u6Hz
@A05_Antares なので、たくさん論文やデータを集めてメタ解析、という手法で評価するんですよ。
RT @Newcli0: 試験デザインの問題を指摘され最後に当のメルクの有効性を示すエビデンスが無いとのコメント出てるやろ。それがFAや。 #すけろく @2012wat ">@2012wat ?src=hashtag_click">#すけろく @2012wat https://t.co/DCO8fIHXVM
@mentju4 @yoshkapundrick @MarionKoopmans You're the one who drew the link between credibility on HCQ/IVM + credibility on pandemic/outbreak origins. Not my fault it's now working against you. 🤷♂️ Your evidence-free paranoid reasoning is manifest in all
@PierreKory No, ivermectin could not have ended the COVID-19 pandemic. Ivermectin has no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on the results of many randomized controlled trials. https://t.co/irl3eYqnEY https://t.co/wZhfRO5SFO https://t.co/9ISVfR
@KathyConWom @PierreKory No there isn’t. https://t.co/boX5zNhfC2
@yoshkapundrick @MarionKoopmans The same background that caused him to be wrong on ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, COVID-19 vaccines, etc. He's just an angry, non-expert conspiracy theorist. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/OtzeJDDVWj https://t.co/n
@scotub @past_is_future @PEHJackson @bell00david @WashburneAlex As baselessly paranoid on pandemic/pathogen origins as you were on ivermectin. https://t.co/DBd8pJPP2y https://t.co/KD0yIdD1n4 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/noqIYSHsow
@CKellyUAP Ivermectin doesn't work, regardless of whether Oxford's Principle trial posts results. And it's like you're completely unaware of a decades-long history of many clinical trials not reporting results. It's not a conspiracy. https://t.co/173oqo
@NeAnOrScared @JR4_Truth @GeraldKutney Same account that was wrong on ivermectin. https://t.co/nX6Clq4fak https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/R7uBQWseSF
RT @jason_willz1: @misterchambo @cpittmore @CShoemakerMD A physician who thinks ivm or hcq has efficacy for covid? they have no efficacy fo…
RT @jason_willz1: @misterchambo @cpittmore @CShoemakerMD A physician who thinks ivm or hcq has efficacy for covid? they have no efficacy fo…
RT @jason_willz1: @CShoemakerMD READ THIS AND WEEP. ivermectin and HCQ have no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on RCT's. https://…
RT @jason_willz1: @CShoemakerMD READ THIS AND WEEP. ivermectin and HCQ have no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on RCT's. https://…
RT @jason_willz1: @CShoemakerMD READ THIS AND WEEP. ivermectin and HCQ have no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on RCT's. https://…
RT @jason_willz1: @CShoemakerMD READ THIS AND WEEP. ivermectin and HCQ have no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on RCT's. https://…
@BulbaPk @melania_jayne Oh I've "looked into it". Have you? Apart from your echo-chamber of idiots and grifters, I mean. Here's some actual study. I've got more if you want it. https://t.co/2FagOxNif8
But this one was censored! Likely because Emperor Yoo Suk's minion trolls are still pushing yet ANOTHER ivermectin disinformation campaign via this American hell site (and the other American hell sites) to try and offset their own karmic tridemic winter. K
@IanCopeland5 Better, earlier, review. (Yes the Chinese trolls on the American hell sites have been pushing this for close to 4 years now and we see before us the results – a never-ending pandemic.) https://t.co/C2NBrWYVHV
@IanCopeland5 https://t.co/5PCj5TqZ65 currently low‐ to high‐certainty evidence that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for people with COVID‐19. ..No evidence is available on ivermectin to prevent SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
@IanCopeland5 https://t.co/5PCj5TqZ65 currently low‐ to high‐certainty evidence that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for people with COVID‐19. ..No evidence is available on ivermectin to prevent SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
@NobodyHadToDie @IraIrleague @IanCopeland5 I can't believe there's anyone thick enough to still believe that ivermectin is effective for covid or that it wouldn't be being used everywhere if it was... https://t.co/Os2fNjSrUi
@TnAlistair @Samuel_Gregson @avghyperborean @Faceplants00 @thebadstats @BretWeinstein Re: "There are more meta-analyses published on ivrm that found stat sign effect than not" https://t.co/TgP9QCVeOi For posterity: Non-expert ivermectin lad was making stu
@TnAlistair @villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk @SlangeVarDave @AlexBerenson ...says the non-expert ivermectin lad. https://t.co/t3UT2yRJrp https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/cZdDc2Tc4V
@Debunk_the_Funk @AlexBerenson Is non-expert ivermectin lad flapping his gums again? https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/EtTP5bPjWP
RT @jason_willz1: @alan2102z @sudokuvariante @AlexBerenson not the highest quality evidence. ivm has no efficacy based on the results of RC…
@SuperArchitect @rootfayth Please show us the part where you see "effectively treats SARS-COV2" or even *ANY* virus... https://t.co/mWoQj2lf6P
@_dailydel @sublickreds @timethief @MrDash109 @YouTube 2/ Since you like Cochrane so much: https://t.co/laTOzEOCCK
@AndyMLinn Now you're just making stuff up in bad faith with no cited evidence, just as you did on ivermectin. No amount of evidence is ever going to get through to a disingenuous conspiracy theorist like you. 🤷♂️ https://t.co/R8JzeiWLIY https://t.co/17
@AndyMLinn @past_is_future Same non-expert conspiracism that misled you on ivermectin also misleads you on lab leak. https://t.co/R8JzeiWLIY https://t.co/173oqole2m https://t.co/WiKh0Kg4uZ