RT @keisuke4713: vitDは風邪やインフルを止める?https://t.co/4wn8x6PMQM vitD補充 🇬🇧毎年300万人以上が風邪やインフルから救う? https://t.co/qWEXhk09r7 https://t.co/TWNikFF742 v…
vidamin D 家にあります。VCも重要だけど、なるべく、🍊とか🍎から接種してね。
vitDは風邪やインフルを止める?https://t.co/4wn8x6PMQM vitD補充 🇬🇧毎年300万人以上が風邪やインフルから救う? https://t.co/qWEXhk09r7 https://t.co/TWNikFF742 vitD摂取33人毎に1人インフル防止*(NNT=33) インフル1例予防にインフル💉40人必要(NNT=40) *Link削除 29人 https://t.co/GqzW7DDncH
@heywillamino @zap_lock I know it was never meant to eradicate the flu, as it evolves that's impossible just like c19 and some other respiratory illnesses. It's not highly effective though⬇️ https://t.co/cK3xg1T10z
@HalikRafa Vaccination may have little or no appreciable effect on hospitalisations (low-certainty evidence) or number of working days lost. https://t.co/i3GXF56XqU
@Pandulcium @MariaKlosinska proszę sprawdzić tutaj: https://t.co/1fsXidiNpK
@JPrzystajko Vaccination may have little or no appreciable effect on hospitalisations (low-certainty evidence) or number of working days lost. https://t.co/i3GXF56XqU
@Fynnderella1 @InformedNJNurse They are lying about that number too. That is too high. Cochrane review says otherwise. https://t.co/TQOnSNXVm2
@KashPrime “Healthy adults who receive inactivated parenteral influenza vaccine … probably experience less influenza, from just over 2% to just under 1%…Certainty of evidence for the small reductions in hospitalisations and time off work is low. “ https:/
@Owonele1 @gnat_y @Kon_z_Valony_ @MurzynfrogXXX Sam to wrzuciłeś xD https://t.co/j4TeCv3nOE
@Pak0___0 @gnat_y @Kon_z_Valony_ @MurzynfrogXXX Masz tu nowsze, gdzie skuteczność w najlepszym przypadku to 1% https://t.co/FzdtPvFJq4
@DopplerEffect93 @genderfuckdyke @RaisingSqrPegs @pondx779369 @AnnaSova17 @ButHisEmails @DanRehrauer No showing harm is so u can make a fully I formed decision. Like flu shot for example r u aware how many needed to vaccine to prevent just 1 case of the fl
@IamBrookJackson hard pass https://t.co/Cws9NqZjow
@JeromeAdamsMD 🙄'Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults' https://t.co/AxGP7Bcnls https://t.co/SEXwOXq5id
RT @detlef16130760: Kritischer Beitrag zur Grippeimpfung. Wie hoch ist denn nun die Wirksamkeit (Nutzen) der Grippeimpfung? Laut Cochrane M…
RT @detlef16130760: Kritischer Beitrag zur Grippeimpfung. Wie hoch ist denn nun die Wirksamkeit (Nutzen) der Grippeimpfung? Laut Cochrane M…
RT @detlef16130760: Kritischer Beitrag zur Grippeimpfung. Wie hoch ist denn nun die Wirksamkeit (Nutzen) der Grippeimpfung? Laut Cochrane M…
RT @detlef16130760: Kritischer Beitrag zur Grippeimpfung. Wie hoch ist denn nun die Wirksamkeit (Nutzen) der Grippeimpfung? Laut Cochrane M…
RT @detlef16130760: Kritischer Beitrag zur Grippeimpfung. Wie hoch ist denn nun die Wirksamkeit (Nutzen) der Grippeimpfung? Laut Cochrane M…
RT @detlef16130760: Kritischer Beitrag zur Grippeimpfung. Wie hoch ist denn nun die Wirksamkeit (Nutzen) der Grippeimpfung? Laut Cochrane M…
RT @detlef16130760: Kritischer Beitrag zur Grippeimpfung. Wie hoch ist denn nun die Wirksamkeit (Nutzen) der Grippeimpfung? Laut Cochrane M…
Kritischer Beitrag zur Grippeimpfung. Wie hoch ist denn nun die Wirksamkeit (Nutzen) der Grippeimpfung? Laut Cochrane Meta-Studie liegt sie in etwa bei 1%. https://t.co/kUd2wjGWfQ @SHomburg @transparenztest ILI = grippeähnliche Symptome Video 👇 https://t.
@jammusaloniemi @JohannaLeino3 Cochrane vaikuttaa olevan eri mieltä. Uskoisinko sitä vaiko sinua tästä mahdottomuudesta, vaikea kysymys. Siitä toki voidaan keskustella onko tuon rokotuksen hyöty/haitta riittävä, ja missä kohorteissa. https://t.co/Od7z7
@NancyDeziel Pourtant, une méta analyse de la cochrane démontre une très très faible efficacité des vaccins contre la grippe et une corrélation entre qui finance et les études positives. https://t.co/39GSe7q6o7 https://t.co/a7Tyu5FG5S
playing whack-a-mole? You might not get flu but just get something similar instead. There is very low confidence that flu vaccines make much difference to the full set of "influenza like illness". But we also don't know that they don't. Because the... htt
@Hugo_Baup Est-ce que les gens vaccinés contre la grippe meurent moins de la grippe que les autres ? Ce n’est pas évident malheureusement. https://t.co/hdPk0xATGP
@rivm De griepvaccins werken niet of nauwelijks. https://t.co/hoOYZkxFGJ https://t.co/1ltjvuuBiL
@Annamericali @JNizinkiewicz @normanpie są wirusy grypopodobne, które nie mutują.... https://t.co/zovG9zVsk5
@stkirsch Yup i'm "antivaxxer"😂, anti mRNA for sure. If you look at the absolut risk in vaccines RCT there's only 2% of reduction, almost same en Flu infection. It's natural, the anamnesic response it's what protect us from severe desease https://t.co/mG1
@Rovers_Chantal Er is geen bewijs voor de werking van de griepprik. https://t.co/MVJGKC3kt9 Zie ook Cochrane: https://t.co/5a72sSMgcX
RT @NFPublication: @sameeha0102 @MikeDonio Local store owner got her flu vx before going on holiday - went to hospital instead. She almost…
@sameeha0102 @MikeDonio Local store owner got her flu vx before going on holiday - went to hospital instead. She almost died. You must also know by now the vx’s make you more susceptible to next season’s flu, and you’ll get it more severely.. https://t.co/
@BoussageonR @docdu16 @barriere_dr https://t.co/zTW2StblDn et ici on vous parle bien d'essai clinique randomisé pour la grippe
@13orangesbc @babybluesnews @stkirsch From data from 2018 for healthy adults, ARR was approximately 1.4% Meaning you had to vaccinate 71 people to prevent one person from contracting it. https://t.co/f5hpgQb7cq This from Peter Doshi senior editor at the
Szczepionka na grypę skuteczność poniżej 3%, u osób +60 skuteczność 0%. https://t.co/mKU7cl6Vm9
RT @normanpie: @TOMEK_T_ @MrsLydiawi @MariuszJagora @Leon_Akordeon 1. Obecna szczepionka przeciwko grypie ma skuteczność 2,8% u ludzi młody…
@DrRotunnog @stonehenge2500 @KITTYKATcpfc @dr_jon_l @DanielKotzin The flu vaccine has very low efficacy. 71 people need to b vaccinated to prevent 1 case of the flu. And it makes little to no difference on hospitalization or missed days of work/school. Flu
@IEHospitalGroup @lukes_ck Influenza vaccines are not particularly effective at preventing illness or death in any cohort of patients. https://t.co/qhI0Kavkt5… https://t.co/8RkN4Mz71t…2216
RT @LBonneux: https://t.co/CZy3rMZsqv Healthy adults who receive influenza vaccine probably experience less influenza, from just over 2%…
RT @LBonneux: https://t.co/CZy3rMZsqv Healthy adults who receive influenza vaccine probably experience less influenza, from just over 2%…
RT @LBonneux: https://t.co/CZy3rMZsqv Healthy adults who receive influenza vaccine probably experience less influenza, from just over 2%…
RT @LBonneux: https://t.co/CZy3rMZsqv Healthy adults who receive influenza vaccine probably experience less influenza, from just over 2%…
RT @LBonneux: https://t.co/CZy3rMZsqv Healthy adults who receive influenza vaccine probably experience less influenza, from just over 2%…
RT @LBonneux: https://t.co/CZy3rMZsqv Healthy adults who receive influenza vaccine probably experience less influenza, from just over 2%…
RT @LBonneux: https://t.co/CZy3rMZsqv Healthy adults who receive influenza vaccine probably experience less influenza, from just over 2%…
RT @LBonneux: https://t.co/CZy3rMZsqv Healthy adults who receive influenza vaccine probably experience less influenza, from just over 2%…
https://t.co/CZy3rMZsqv Healthy adults who receive influenza vaccine probably experience less influenza, from just over 2% to just under 1% (moderate‐certainty evidence). (Als je je hele volwassen leven vaccineert, mis je 1 griep episode)
Agreed. For example I had absolutely no idea that the flu vaccine is a complete lie. I was shocked to discover that it's virtually completely ineffective: https://t.co/u7VyQFXfsz And the flu vaccine was probably the vaccine present most in the cultural co
@gorskon The evidence base for the efficacy of flu vaccines isn't exactly overwhelming. The evidence base for pharmaceutical companies having commercial interests is. https://t.co/XsNrxkEf7z
@jonathanstea His doctor should have just shown him the impressive evidence base. Oh… https://t.co/O66Zxk7Xck
@QubRadio Ouf, bon expert vendus aux pharmas, le vaccin contre l'influenza a une très très faible efficacité, une méta analyse de la cochrane le confirme, comme pour les masques, d'ailleurs. Et les autres virus avaient pas disparu on ne testait pas. Expert
@MomPedBlog "Flu Vaccination may have little or no appreciable effect on hospitalisations (low-certainty evidence) or number of working days lost." https://t.co/cK3xg1T10z
@Marco_Piani @USMortality Also a waste of time. https://t.co/ytIFNAvFlS
@barriere_dr Vaccin contre la grippe: pourquoi le recommander? 1 à 2% de grippes évitées, avec des preuves de certitude modérées. C'est pas fiable, Cochrane? 🤔 https://t.co/am9X0WGCXW https://t.co/PHNBIIF1NY
@DopplerEffect93 @VPrasadMDMPH @TheEliKlein Funny, why recommend vaccine that is not really effective, in fact only data from Big Pharma found a limited effect https://t.co/uqfT5qbC6K https://t.co/KWjvwzCuvj
RT @ToeNegro: W meta-analizie Cochrane też opisano, że szczepionki na grypę nie działają lub działają w bardzo ograniczonym zakresie (1-2%…
@WronskaAlex @albi10569486 @PPolityce @normanpie Tak jakby nie jednak działają 🤡 xd https://t.co/ZnW0nASkw0
@CDCgov @CDCDirector "Injected influenza vaccines probably have a small protective effect against influenza and ILI (moderate-certainty evidence), as 71 people would need to be vaccinated to avoid one influenza case, and 29 would need to be vaccinated to a
RT @ToeNegro: W meta-analizie Cochrane też opisano, że szczepionki na grypę nie działają lub działają w bardzo ograniczonym zakresie (1-2%…
W meta-analizie Cochrane też opisano, że szczepionki na grypę nie działają lub działają w bardzo ograniczonym zakresie (1-2% domniemanej skuteczności u zdrowych dorosłych): https://t.co/9m9kgFzRnu Na jakich podstawach innych niż ideologia, kult i kasa zal
Cochrane review in 2018 compiled Influenza vaccine studies. This for "healthy adults" (not kids, not elderly) Their conclusion (link has full report) https://t.co/A5ZHh2hxvy https://t.co/UfYHYaYo1D
@ewyler @Tim_Roehn @torsten_harmsen … Sie denn Daten präsentieren zur Wirksamkeit der Grippe-Impfung? Wie steht es um die Numbers needed to vaccinate, um bei einem gesunden Erwachsenen eine Grippe-Erkrankung zu verhindern? Jefferson et al. kamen in 2018 zu
@Dr_logicaI @DrPaulOffit Good thing the work has been https://t.co/56IDuxwdsh
@thereal_truther @JohntheLyricist @StabellBenn So that is when we look at randomized data if it's available & cochrane review finds low certainty evidence of no difference in influenza hospitalization rates between vaccinated & unvaccinated healthy
@lorelei3112 @rivm Funfact: Er is geen bewijs dat het griepvaccin ziekenhuisopnamen of sterfte voorkomt. https://t.co/sNWSStZRCg https://t.co/hoOYZkxFGJ
@Skudamore @StabellBenn Thank you so much for bringing this up! Yes 71 & low certainty there was no effect on rate of hospitalization rates or time off work. And no evidence of transmission prevention. Scandinavia also saw how pandemrix flu vaccine cau
@gadboit @VPrasadMDMPH Yes, check out the Cochrane reference and the conclusion: https://t.co/tf4LtW1JJI "Inactivated vaccines can reduce the proportion of healthy adults (including pregnant women) who have influenza and ILI, but their impact is modest. W
@ChristosArgyrop Cochrane Review 2018 https://t.co/eZxNZsX2iR
@PamLongCO What is a usual threshold for "number needed to treat" to approve a treatment? I thought it was < 10. The "healthy adult" study has NN = 71. For over 65 it's 30. https://t.co/mVK7Whdngt
@Sailor63Tomek @slidexman Być może to jeden z wielu powodów tak niskiej skuteczności? https://t.co/o5N6dLg069
@4M_S4 @michallembryk @Marcelii10 @hazan @TruePomezZ na przykład tu: https://t.co/KlKRG1zR8e
@NeyensSimonne @oro33353195 @DominiekC @SchoofsLiliane @VTMNIEUWS @vrtnws @destandaard @demorgen Het klinkt mooi wat je hier zegt, maar weet je dat als je alle degelijke onderzoeken samen neemt, er geen bewijs is dat mensen niet ernstig ziek worden door de
@DominicSicard2 @jlkBlackburn Et pour vous dire comment on nous manipule sans cesse, ça fait longtemps que les méta analyses démontrent que le vaccin contre la grippe c'est bon à rien pour les personnes en santé, pourtant, tout d'un coup c'était une bonne
@PhilipGreenspun @VPrasadMDMPH flu shots?? Good lord. There is no good evidence for that either. Never has been. A mere 15% of the studies in healthy adults are considered to be well conducted with low bias.. https://t.co/lS7bZBuEUP https://t.co/AxGP7Bc
@ButHisEmails @VitoCortapassi @doritmi @Debunk_the_Funk @ScienceBasedMed @han_francis . I used to be very outspoken PRO-vax Until allmost 3 years ago Because I finally uncovered 'key RAW-data' But it's not for trolls, you have to have some (basic) textboo
@DocAhmadMalik Hey Doc, I don't hold out much hope for the flu vax considering .. https://t.co/8QTk8jRT1G... "probably", NNV not great, "Little or no small reduction in days off work". They sound about as efficacious as the C19 mRNA therapeutics! They're n
@jdceulaer . De jaarlijkse Influenza Griep-prik werkt NIET of nauwelijks NNTV = 71 Om 1 keer resultaat te boeken, dien je gedurende 71 jaar lang elk jaar 'n prik te nemen Je begint op je 65e, dan dien je te leven tot 136 jaar Op 35 => 106 (Zie bijw
Según Cochrane. Un adulto sano que se vacuna vs la gripe sólo disminuye en un 2 % el riesgo de enfermarse vs quien decide no vacunarse 💉. https://t.co/f4QhmwPDe6. https://t.co/zgs30cvcL2
@zabigfrench1 @David71321863 @Drmartyufml @lionel_case @JulienPain Et d'ailleurs les vaccins contre la grippe ne marche pas, on croit qu'ils marchent parce que des études médiocres financées par les pharmaceutiques sont publiées dans les grosses publicatio
@DominiekC . Wat zijn Wappies ? Cochane bewijst wetenschappelijk (meta-studie & studie van RAW-data, via FoIA), dat de jaarlijkse Influenza seizoens-Griep prik NIET werkt (NNTV = 71) Duizenden specialisten & vrijwilligers die voor Cochrane werke
@goddeketal @angie_rasmussen . Influenza Flu-shots do not work NNTV = 71 Is evidence based / best practice champion 'Cochrane' an anti-vaxer, by sorting this out (meta-studies) ? . https://t.co/faT8Wb3GMZ
@jwprosje . Je kan gewoon wetenschappelijk aantonen dat de jaarlijkse griep-prik NIET werkt (NNTV = 71) Evidence Based (Cochrane Meta-study) . https://t.co/faT8Wb3GMZ
@vanranstmarc . In '64 stierven baby's die 't experimenteel kregen Buiten Griep-prik (NNTV = 71 !), leiden vaccinaties tegen de àndere ILI (Influenza like illnesses) steevast tot averechtse effecten onmiddellijk of op termijn Anti-body Dependent Enhanc
@OscarP82167032 @zeg_eens_aad . & de jaarlijikse (Influenza) Griep-prik werkt NIET Tenzij je 'n wit-geradicaliseerde bent, die 'n NNTV = 71 "au serieux" denk te moeten nemen Read them & weep.. Metastudie (van metatstudies) & opvragen van RAW
@Christo63100802 . 'n RSV-vaccin is even rampzalig als eentje tegen Corona-virussen Die dingen hebben STEEDS AVERECHTS gewerkt, met beschadiging van 't immuun-sytem zodat mens & dier juist veel ziekier werden, met dodelijke afloop 't Klassieke Griep-
@Wdekanter @KNMG @NTvG_actueel @Thuisarts @zeg_eens_aad . De jaarlijkse (influenza) Griep-prik werkt slechts in 1 op 72 gevallen. Dat is een eufemisme om te omzeilen dat ze gewoon NIET werkt. Niettemin zijn er wel BIJWERKINGEN aan verbonden, zoals opstij
@Wdekanter @KNMG @reneheman @Thuisarts @LHVhuisartsen @NHG_NL @ErnstKuipersVWS . Klick op de linkedin-link (helemaal bovenaan) en lees de reacties daar.. Hier al wat evidence based meta-studies, die aantonen dat de jaarlijkse (Influenza) Griep-prik gewoon
RT @LBonneux: “71 healthy adults need to be vaccinated to prevent one of them experiencing influenza” https://t.co/CZy3rMZsqv Wie de gri…
RT @LBonneux: “71 healthy adults need to be vaccinated to prevent one of them experiencing influenza” https://t.co/CZy3rMZsqv Wie de gri…
Eens, behalve de suggestie dat kindervaccinaties zinvol zouden zijn.
@Filiecs2 @Thomas_Banacek @LoofboroDan @zookeepermc @jonathanstea Good lord🤦♀️ 71 would need to get the jab so 1 didn't catch the flu. And who knows if those numbers r even correct. Jab science is loony. Most studies r riddled w the words "may" "could" "b