@Mediavenir https://t.co/8kODKM33kW Étude fondée sur les preuves de la plus gde revue Evidence based médecine. Des milliers d’etudes de terrains compilées : les masques ne protègent pas de la transmission des virus respiratoires. Dt le Covid, @aur_roussea
@BFMTV Les masques ne protègent pas de la transmission des virus respiratoires dt le Covid. Étude publiée ds la plus grande revue de Médecine fondée par les preuves. Evidence based médecine qui a compilé des milliers d’etudes de terrain, janvier 2023. Ça
@BFMTV @aur_rousseau Zéro efficacité https://t.co/POiWdt1DKv
@mushotoku2019 @GaetanGracia @RevPermanente @AliceDesbiolles @amine_umlil https://t.co/8kODKM3Bau Lire. Y a rien de mieux. Science based médecine. Le reste, c du tricot.
@mushotoku2019 @GaetanGracia @RevPermanente @AliceDesbiolles @amine_umlil C’est faux. Les PREUVES. Revue specialisee sur les PREUVES. Lis https://t.co/8kODKM3Bau
@JosAnto24680 @PENELOPPE192 Je suis médecin et de votre côté. Tout mon soutien. Je résisterai au masque si ils essayent de nous l’imposer à nouveau. Et on a ça quand même comme argument : https://t.co/POiWdt1DKv
@Cestmoistef @sunriseNFM meta analyse 78 études Cochrane 31 janvier 2023 traitant du “peu ou pas d efficacité des masques” https://t.co/cAtBvrQLGl
@ValidScience @DrJBhattacharya As a former global quality director of a major mfg of respirators, masks (even N95) don’t work on tiny virus particles. https://t.co/UJ9VoNfm2Q
@BFMTV Pourquoi masquer la vérité ? https://t.co/VVd74lSPJH
@Mediavenir Pourquoi masquer la vérité ? https://t.co/VVd74lSPJH
@BFMTV Aucune utilité https://t.co/POiWdt1DKv
@LCI Aucune efficacité https://t.co/POiWdt1DKv
@BFMTV Aucune utilité https://t.co/POiWdt1DKv
RT @dkabq8: @TheDrJon @KGLiebowitz Cochrane 2020 and 2023 show that you are incorrect. https://t.co/znTG0XRWCI https://t.co/jnWI3dKEnf
RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…
RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…
RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…
RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…
RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…
@DrEliDavid Yes for Tyson, not a critical thinker but a consensus and preacher of the narrative. I bet he thinks a trace gas like CO2 is causing warming because that’s the narrative and not the science. https://t.co/UJ9VoNfm2Q
@WarClandestine I will not comply. Who are these ignorant people that will. https://t.co/UJ9VoNfm2Q
@WallStreetSilv Masks don’t work in tiny viruses. https://t.co/UJ9VoNfm2Q
@conservmillen @FredSimonTLM Nor am I. They don’t work against tiny viruses, let’s follow the science for once. https://t.co/UJ9VoNfm2Q
@TheDrJon @KGLiebowitz Cochrane 2020 and 2023 show that you are incorrect. https://t.co/znTG0XRWCI https://t.co/jnWI3dKEnf
@KathrynHenzler Cochrane 2020 and 2023 disagree: https://t.co/znTG0XRWCI https://t.co/jnWI3dKEnf
@GerardAshfelter @t7NFtWbwppPyGQ4 ⬇️見てますか？ 存在しないウイルスでどう実験したんですか？ あなたの個人的な願望はいらないですし、『存在しないぞー』ってあなたが言い始めましたよw それこそ、悪魔の証明をあなたがしようよしましたねw https://t.co/Tk3CeILuVJ
@catsscareme2021 Yes here is the most comprehensive mask study showing no difference. https://t.co/8jgrXOOA6y
@GenFlynn I will be not comply. I wii follow the science, https://t.co/8jgrXOOA6y
@JessicaLexicus So how is your cloth and surgical mask working again if EVEN medical grade alternatives are failing ? Study Article: https://t.co/piBjN2IPzw no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask” Stud
@SpikeKavalench @LisaSingerUBC @rusty0216 Not the block button. I can’t go on without your wisdom “There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza compared to
@jljcolorado @Nature No they don't. We have tried this nonsense for over two years and they made o difference. https://t.co/dWAAxyiQ4I
@stonehenge2500 Cochrane reviews says no. https://t.co/dWAAxyiQ4I
@danuzioneto CFM orientou a retirada de máscaras dos aeroportos em fevereiro de 2023 por ineficácia das mesmas (Revista Oeste publicou). Foi enviada a metanálise da Cochrane Library (segue o link). De lá pra cá sem novidades. https://t.co/7wbprylss3 htt
@laurieallee First it was surfaces. Then it was droplets. Now it's aerosols. What is the evidence behind these theories? (Hand washing is the only thing with any good studies saying that it makes a small difference https://t.co/dWAAxyiQ4I)
RT @hudikaha: コクラン論文へのリンク https://t.co/dUzzVFzy38
RT @hudikaha: コクラン論文へのリンク https://t.co/dUzzVFzy38
RT @hudikaha: コクラン論文へのリンク https://t.co/dUzzVFzy38
RT @hudikaha: コクラン論文へのリンク https://t.co/dUzzVFzy38
RT @hudikaha: コクラン論文へのリンク https://t.co/dUzzVFzy38
コクラン論文へのリンク https://t.co/dUzzVFzy38
@RoelvanG @TessPob @annstrikje De samenleving kan dat vinden maar al voor het uitbreken van de pandemie bestond de onderstaande cochrane review. Mondkapjes werken niet tegen virusinfecties (zelfs niet tegen post-op wondinfecties trouwens) https://t.co/6K
@LongCovidSOS @trishgreenhalgh @IndependentSage studies say no https://t.co/dWAAxyiQ4I
@CALonghurst @eye_tee @UCSDHealth Cochrane 2020 and 2023 beg to differ. https://t.co/znTG0XRWCI https://t.co/jnWI3dKEnf
@MixtUpMixy @Brettheepi Imagine after 3 years of this bullshit and you still think masks work. 🤡 Germany mandated n95s and it didn't make the slightest difference. The Cochrane review came to the same conclusion based on the quality of evidence. https://
@MeetJess Cochrane 2020 and 2023 show otherwise. https://t.co/znTG0XRWCI https://t.co/jnWI3dKEnf
@Iamjacksdisgust @mike_carista Here’s another one fruit loop… https://t.co/SnWvw6mKBY
@ReesiePeacie Are you going to do it forever? Did you know that after 3 years there is still no decent evidence of masks working? https://t.co/dWAAxyiQ4I
@taka32193219 @Nishi8777 @F_Lonly19 一度もRCTで統計的に有意差が認められないものに執着するとは。オカルト宗教家でしょうか？ https://t.co/qghqYOwLHC
@le_Parisien « Sur la base des études que nous avons évaluées, nous ne sommes pas certains que le port de masques ou de masques respiratoires N95/P2 contribue à ralentir la propagation des virus respiratoires. » https://t.co/ZiBhTRryqZ
@fitterhappierAJ You are incorrect about masking: https://t.co/znTG0XRWCI https://t.co/jnWI3dKEnf
@scott_squires @drvyom @taipan168 No, it's not. But it (or cloth masks) is what previous masking suggestions/requirements were referring to. Moreover, Cochrane 2020 and 2023: https://t.co/znTG0XRWCI https://t.co/jnWI3dKEnf
@CrumbsnRubble @obyrne_rachael And that why health care professionals mask, not to prevent respiratory viruses https://t.co/6KlYRHnWoy
@quill65 @Huaian2007 @obyrne_rachael You teach scientific methodology but never heard of the Cochrane institute? https://t.co/6KlYRHnWoy
@obyrne_rachael Seems like that dentist is up to date (unlike you) https://t.co/6KlYRHnWoy
RT @hudikaha: コクランのRCTのメタ解析論文で効果無し * 2023年1月、マスクに効果は認められなかったとする RCTメタ解析論文公開 * 何十年もインフルエンザや新型コロナなどの呼吸器系疾患に対するマスクRCTで効果が認められ無いのだから、効果は無い * h…
@Iamjacksdisgust Cochrane 2020 and 2023 beg to differ -- respect the science. https://t.co/znTG0XRWCI https://t.co/jnWI3dKEnf https://t.co/XbSxhp1ZVP
@dregenus @corona_realism Kannst Du uns nochmal die Indikation zu Masken bei Kleinkindern näherbringen? Du kannst Dich dabei auf die IFR bei Kleinkindern und auch auf die Cochranestudie beziehen. Wenn dann Zweifel aufkommen, mimm eines deiner menschenverac
@girlziplocked Respectfully, Cochrane pre-Covid meta review suggests otherwise. https://t.co/SQiigdh47u “There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza comp
@karkat_horror @legalizegoblins Wearing a mask does not protect others. https://t.co/znTG0XRWCI https://t.co/jnWI3dKEnf
@anesan_ns 医療従事者なら、コクランぐらい読みなさい。マスクに感染予防効果があるとか、カルト宗教じみたことを主張するのは社会にとって迷惑です。 https://t.co/qghqYOwLHC
@Raphael_F666 @Cymatics13 If they are not wearing a clean, properly fitted, properly worn N95 respirator or better, then they are fooling themselves. https://t.co/znTG0XRWCI https://t.co/jnWI3dKEnf
@Blackmoor_Film @Cymatics13 And yet they would still be wrong: https://t.co/znTG0XRWCI https://t.co/jnWI3dKEnf
@Ruth45080116 @K_Niemietz @jburnmurdoch Are they the same Dems who think masks are effective despite Cochrane 2020 and Cochrane 2023? https://t.co/znTG0XRWCI https://t.co/jnWI3dKEnf
@bhunni @USFreedomFlyers @marwilliamson Recent Cochran study disagrees on mask “effectiveness” https://t.co/yS0g4wqVzs
RT @NShimohata: @KUMANICHIs マスクに感染予防効果はあったの？ 報道機関なら少しは真面目に取材してはいかがでしょうか。 熊本日日新聞社 @KUMANICHIs https://t.co/qghqYOwLHC
@KUMANICHIs マスクに感染予防効果はあったの？ 報道機関なら少しは真面目に取材してはいかがでしょうか。 熊本日日新聞社 @KUMANICHIs https://t.co/qghqYOwLHC
@LabourBerry @EssexPR This review came to the same conclusion. https://t.co/dWAAxyiQ4I
@myrabatchelder @CDCDirector The masks were all theater to keep up the illusion of a deadly pandemic. No evidence of them working after 3 years of the nonsense. https://t.co/dWAAxyiQ4I
RT @NShimohata: @ttanigawa3 まさかマスクに感染予防効果があると主張するのに、厚生労働省のゴミ解説を引用するとは驚愕です。 せめてコクランを引用しましょう！ https://t.co/qghqYOwLHC
RT @NShimohata: @ttanigawa3 まさかマスクに感染予防効果があると主張するのに、厚生労働省のゴミ解説を引用するとは驚愕です。 せめてコクランを引用しましょう！ https://t.co/qghqYOwLHC
@ttanigawa3 まさかマスクに感染予防効果があると主張するのに、厚生労働省のゴミ解説を引用するとは驚愕です。 せめてコクランを引用しましょう！ https://t.co/qghqYOwLHC
@aoyagi_yukiko マスクに感染予防効果があるのか真面目に調べて下さい。 https://t.co/qghqYOwLHC
@maple_antei https://t.co/VxUdk086ei はい こんなことより憲法改正して憲法９７条削除して緊急事態条項を設ける危険性とかについて広めたほうがいいと思います
@Zahr_Bloom No Azahara, las mascarillas no son salvavidas. Tienen efectos similares a los amuletos o a los placebos y son escasos (aunque alarmantes los indicadores de daños colaterales graves, especialmente en niños). Fue un negocio, un eslabón de la mani
@DrSkawman @CondeEsceptico La evidencia dice que las Mascarillas NO sirven. 2023! ¿Negarse a la evidencia qué es? https://t.co/ohsveeZFTE
@WingsScotland Except masks don't make any difference. https://t.co/dWAAxyiQ4I Plenty of other evidence of this as well.
@CU39tUZLSkFaueL なるべく距離をとる、会話を抑えることで軽減できます。 死体ｗについてはなかなか人間の死体が日常に落ちてないので考えたことも無いですねｗwww ”呼吸器系ウイルスが人々の間で広がるのを防ぐための物理的な対策としては、以下のようなものがある” https://t.co/4yUk4ZJbCc
@DrJayMohan @nytimes Because it's pointless theater. https://t.co/dWAAxyjnUg
@LIVEandLENDinLA @nytimes Because it's pointless theater. https://t.co/dWAAxyiQ4I