@9mimmi_mimmi9 @rsO74kUTvioBYAL @matubarashiminn 世界最高峰のエビデンスです https://t.co/LgpcGtcTyD

@Doctor_Eric_B https://t.co/S52uHSOXj8

And…scene. Lmfao Score: Lamar - 6 Dirt Wall - 0000000000

@LamarVannoy11 @TheEliKlein @mkarolian Or, perhaps, you were somehow unaware of the Cochrane Library meta analysis of 20 RCTs which found "moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference" wrt to the flu. https://t.co/

@VPrasadMDMPH There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask Harms were rarely measured and poorly reported. https://t.co/ecsl

@ric09160767 @TheEliKlein Looks like the link is down but here it is. If you search the site you should find the review. https://t.co/e78GAvU4v0

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

@sascha71654615 @ProfRambazamba @DoHeinerultras @anti_alarmist_ Cochrane Systematic Review https://t.co/puwZDBYxke "the pooled results of randomised trials did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks

@captain_stavros @GeorgeMonbiot Anyone who starts a discussion with Bollocks is unlikely to have an open mind. Here is one meta study that shows masks don’t stop transmission https://t.co/2vPZRx1AcA

@Garcio72 Búscame con sólo meta-análisis que avale que la mascarilla reduce la infección por virus respiratorios en entornos no controlados. 1 solo Rafa. Yo aquí te pongo 3 que dicen lo contrario, que su uso no marca una diferencia significativa con su n

@SKGandhiMD https://t.co/czAjbGWS3C

@JGooballs @hisuehere https://t.co/9PRqRcVJBG

@ChihuahuaOly @iciluce @Sebasti27592176 @barriere_dr https://t.co/17VGhRvf8t

@healthbyjames Shut up and act. "There is low certainty evidence from nine trials (3507 participants) that wearing a mask may make little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI) compared to not wearing a mask " https://t.co/LQGPJUw2

@Bob_Wachter Masking religion. Never mind the data. The best evidence shows that masks and N95 are very poor in preventing viral transmission: Pre-COVID: https://t.co/Y8C6ENzF9U… COVID era: https://t.co/JP5B7XoKZx… https://t.co/ZO3Y0cGPov… N95: https://t

@nzap9290 @yamikawadays @saakun1004 @PDTH3ahqRCrVri7 @jbx_pw 結果がバラバラ？毎回有意差がでないで安定してますよ？ https://t.co/LgpcGtcTyD コクランレビューでも マスク効果への信頼度は中程度 低くないですよ？ https://t.co/7RzAV3w9AN

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

マスクに効果がないとかwww効果あるのだがwwwww周回遅れにもほどがあるwwww無知で情弱にもほどがあるwwwwww さすが分数の計算も出来ないだけあるwww小学生からやりなおせ

@saakun1004 @yamikawadays @PDTH3ahqRCrVri7 @jbx_pw マスクに効果がないし、インフル以下の感染症へマスクなんていらないから外せ と言っているのですが？ あなたも含めて無知ですよね？ https://t.co/LgpcGtcTyD 無知であること以外になにが？ https://t.co/2H911QsNXk

@clgschoen @MiguelNicolelis @nesimachado @lucashistoria13 @GustavoM2014 @AndreJanonesAdv Evidências da melhor qualidade possível mostram que máscaras NÃO evitam a transmissão viral. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/rN22VyrFIo Era Covidus: https://t.co/r4QgWMNcb4 ht

@beattrice_ Evidências da melhor qualidade possível mostram que máscaras NÃO evitam a transmissão viral. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/rN22VyrFIo Era Covidus: https://t.co/r4QgWMNcb4 https://t.co/2VsYj1sqnh N95: https://t.co/xRpzQ43M6Q Não é RCT, mas é de quem v

@OGNNBrasil Evidências da melhor qualidade possível mostram que máscaras NÃO evitam a transmissão viral. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/rN22VyrFIo Era Covidus: https://t.co/r4QgWMNcb4 https://t.co/2VsYj1sqnh N95: https://t.co/xRpzQ43M6Q Não é RCT, mas é de quem v

Evidências da melhor qualidade possível mostram que máscaras NÃO evitam a transmissão viral. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/rN22VyrFIo Era Covidus: https://t.co/r4QgWMNcb4 https://t.co/2VsYj1sqnh N95: https://t.co/xRpzQ43M6Q Não é RCT, mas é de quem vos fala: htt

@UOLNoticias Evidências da melhor qualidade possível mostram que máscaras NÃO evitam a transmissão viral. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/rN22VyrFIo Era Covidus: https://t.co/r4QgWMNcb4 https://t.co/2VsYj1sqnh N95: https://t.co/xRpzQ43M6Q Não é RCT, mas é de quem

@revistaoeste Evidências da melhor qualidade possível mostram que máscaras não evitam a transmissão viral. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/rN22VyrFIo Era Covidus: https://t.co/r4QgWMNcb4 https://t.co/2VsYj1sqnh N95: https://t.co/xRpzQ43M6Q Não é RCT, mas é de quem

@UllmannMdB Es isi eine Aberglaube, dass die Maske vor respiratorischen Infektionen schützt. Jedem steht jedoch frei, das Amulett zu tragen. https://t.co/a8LMGVL8jA

RT @ivaningrad: Otro meta-análisis de RCTs: https://t.co/MiNorxqsHw https://t.co/Ndc8TsNZeV

https://t.co/e8yPlSFWiW コロナ以前の実験結果によるマスク効果のメタアナリシス。論文内容はマスクに限らず全ての介入の効果を解析している。 手指衛生以外は効果が確認できなかったが、全ての結果で正確性が低～中程度となっていてこれをコロナ対策に一般化できない。もっとちゃんとした試験をしろ

@tonden2 @lullymiura 散々効果無しというエビデンスが積み上がってましたがね。 https://t.co/rNohO1F2Rs

@LeastIThoughtSo @Mon4Kooyong All right what about this Cochrane analysis. It is pre 2019 and so pre politicization of masks. it shows only very marginal protection with N95 in a setting where trained staff are in a room with an infectious person. https://

RT @ivaningrad: Otro meta-análisis de RCTs: https://t.co/MiNorxqsHw https://t.co/Ndc8TsNZeV

@Coys0527 @mygiddyauntie @charliesmithvcr @sameo416 It doesn't save anyone's life. A meta-analysis found "No reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of masks." Sorry, but making yourself look like a psycho for no reason is not the intelligent

(8/170) not wearing a mask” Study article: https://t.co/VwRWa8aPKH

@mariavhawkins @DocJeffD The number #1 NPI (other than avoiding all human contact) is Hand Hygiene, and it only helps reduce cases by 16% on average. Masks don't have any measure efficacy in RCTs, so leaving the off is A-OK. https://t.co/uUKiQPTsOd

@MaeLovesRock @space_florida @Hold2LLC @luckytran Paddle aside, I have a minor in statistics, so I am well-qualified to read/interpret studies. RCTs = High-Quality Medical Evidence Meta-analyses of RCTs = Highest Quality Not one RCT shows mask make diff

RT @SorenSchifter: Nu er "eksperterne" igen på banen med diverse biased synspunkter om såkaldte Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs). -…

RT @SorenSchifter: Nu er "eksperterne" igen på banen med diverse biased synspunkter om såkaldte Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs). -…

@NatRaybould @guardian Nope. They don't work. Read and learn: https://t.co/AsDuwCD5ZD

Nu er "eksperterne" igen på banen med diverse biased synspunkter om såkaldte Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs). - Hvad med at tage udgangspunkt i den videnskabelige dokumentation. https://t.co/1ZCrvvmpVK https://t.co/kzNTsyXujf #dkpol #dkmedier #s

@la_resistensia_ @reynamduron Piensan q con un gráfico pueden asustar a la gente? No sean payasos y eduquense @reynamduron https://t.co/gvN3JMZ8Z0 https://t.co/uHCmLHnvP7

@GrapeCollie @JDawsonTweets @Ingrid_Jacques @detroitnews https://t.co/a8dniB3oIg

@QuantumNorm @kumaranvinay @nathaliejacoby1 some of the well-known evidence prior to covid and mention that yes, the Danmask and Bangladesh studies are the 2 RCTs during covid - both failed to find a meaningful effect. Reviews/Meta-analyses https://t.co/

@RimaForAAPS @kristenmag @ninaj1003 Rima, let's be frank, you're an idiot. Stop using masks to harm children because you have Munchausen Syndrome. Cochrane Review (Nov 2020) Q. "Do physical measures such as ... wearing masks stop or slow down the spread o

@TalkTV @JuliaHB1 @LD_Sceptics I thought you said you could read? “overall, masks were the best performing intervention across populations, settings and threats.” https://t.co/nxffFj3t3r

@AS02437670 @ParentCritical @johannabloggt https://t.co/6Big45F5cu

@lorelei3112 Die ergernis snap ik dan weer niet. Er is geen bewijs dat ze werken. Echt niet. Alleen labtechnisch bij perfecte omstandigheden. Ook in https://t.co/LKwi3h0HAZ staat dat het niets toevoegd.

@aycerbic @rupasubramanya That’s a model, and it makes sense on a theoretical level. However, the Cochrane systematic review featuring actual RCTs is my gold standard and does not find much support for masks—only hand hygiene is solidly supported. https:/

@Chocola57835045 @FrancoisBncx @BFMTV @confinementtot1 https://t.co/17VGhRvf8t

@ProfRambazamba Was sagt die Evidenz? https://t.co/L4fmsKg8aA https://t.co/2ot3wie9a6 https://t.co/LoedejMEIa Gut erprobt sind die Masken gegen Atemwegsinfekte… nur die Ergebnisse sind anders, als es viele erwartet hätten. #MaskenRunter!

@GBNEWS They didn’t work before Covid and don’t working during. https://t.co/Qs1JN5DKCh

@JeromeAdamsMD The security sensation that masks give is an illusion, at least if you believe the best available evidence. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/Y8C6ENAcZs… COVID era: https://t.co/JP5B7XpiP5… https://t.co/ZO3Y0cHne3… N95: https://t.co/7VqUeazwYz…

@WHO @mvankerkhove Your masks don’t work https://t.co/Qs1JN5DKCh

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

@dark_scientist @michaeljswalker @james_e_b_ Citation of what, exactly? You are not an intellectual. You're just blindly accepting a corporate news article without any kind of critical thinking An actual review of all available high quality evidence found

@BAG_OFSP_UFSP A great thread on masking. How they do not work but only cause harm. Please do not ever mandate mask usage again, not for Covid, not for the next plandemic. https://t.co/7mH0I46INZ

https://t.co/7mH0I47gDx

@quervain_de Another thread for you on the total lack of efficacy of masks (and the harm they cause) https://t.co/7mH0I46INZ

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…

RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…

@devisridhar No they don’t https://t.co/Qs1JN5DKCh

@DellAnnaLuca @ClarkeMicah You have sent no links, only quotes out of context, sometimes about "bacterial colonisation" (COVID is viral, so inapplicable). Here is a summary of the evidence from early 2020 by the Cochrane Library. And unlike you, I will p

@AlexHeffron20 @james_e_b_ @PJHfan83 @OwenJones84 @TaisieT These folks disagree. https://t.co/Qs1JN5DKCh

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

@BBCBreakfast Where is the ’strongly evidenced’ evidence? It’s not here? https://t.co/Qs1JN5DKCh

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

RT @ifihadastick: However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clea…

However, the ACTUAL Cochrane Review, from 2020 found this: "The pooled results of randomized trials did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection" https://t.co/dkJU0Mivlf https://t.co/aniyjMlDJ9

RT @LoveHamma9: @boriquagato Wow, mask advocates totally ignore randomized trials! Cochrane Review 2011 https://t.co/F2fpKnrEBv CR Nov 2020…

@devisridhar Masks *don't* work. Meta-analysis: "No reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of masks." https://t.co/I4jZDEP1Qm

RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…

@boriquagato Wow, mask advocates totally ignore randomized trials! Cochrane Review 2011 https://t.co/F2fpKnrEBv CR Nov 2020 update (no change): https://t.co/SGmzoprd5R Danish RCT, IMHO best public use RCT, given 50 surgical masks & TRAINED in proper us

@cricketwyvern @trishgreenhalgh The best evidence shows that masks and N95 are very poor in preventing viral transmission: Pre-COVID https://t.co/Y8C6ENzF9U… COVID era: https://t.co/JP5B7XoKZx… https://t.co/ZO3Y0cGPov… N95: https://t.co/7VqUeayZ91…

@devisridhar The best evidence shows that masks and N95 are very poor in preventing viral transmission: Pre-COVID https://t.co/Y8C6ENzF9U… COVID era: https://t.co/JP5B7XoKZx… https://t.co/ZO3Y0cGPov… N95: https://t.co/7VqUeayZ91…