@KiltedRef @replouiegohmert Sure. Here is a good summary of the evidence we have from the Cochrane Collaboration "we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19. The completed studies are small and few are co
@phillyblackshee @Cheese12987 @ArtysHouse @MisterBGood @_GreatUnwashed @joerogan @drsanjaygupta @CNN To decide if a drug or protocol is effective you have to use meta analysis that study all the papers published - the whole set. That tells you if the resea
@LaraRodr1guez Simple copy/paste error. https://t.co/hRV4dVDYEE
@BobBell63814986 Science disagrees with you https://t.co/w3oxQ1Ps8L
@sonoran_capital @Dennis_Porter_ They’ve done the studies. It just hasn’t consistently worked. Some studies have shown it does, most show it doesn’t. And unfortunately the methodologies of the former group are questionable. https://t.co/A3w2NbH1yf https:
@NashVolGuy @GidMK Re: "I simply want answers" No, you don't. You'll just make up any + every excuse to defend ivermectin no matter what, like many other ivermectin fans. It's an anti-parasitic agent, not an antiviral. https://t.co/KiRaYi41LS https://t
@LaraRodr1guez https://t.co/hRV4dVDYEE Gold standard with Cochrane. They find ZERO evidence.
RT @ltoons: Iver. info. https://t.co/l5BxLkxhMz
@BrianCarriere @pattzachhabitat @RolandCataford @jkenney You don’t read a few papers and decide if it’s effective. You do a meta analysis of all papers published. Cochrane the gold standard already has done that- it’s ineffective and research doesn’t answe
@xeplusplus Actually, since ivermectin is already an FDA-approved drug, it can be prescribed for covid. Doctors don't do it because credible evidence that it works is lacking. There are plenty of studies now underway. https://t.co/xrB6ZAWMyV
Iver. info. https://t.co/l5BxLkxhMz
‘Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials.’ https://t.co/fRViGabGhv
#SVerificado Médicos salvadoreños tampoco recomiendan el uso de Ivermectina. https://t.co/of7WqMhqkr
@DrRobDavidson @joerogan @drsanjaygupta Looks like there is conflicting evidence, maybe amend your statement to say we don’t know if. https://t.co/MnSlUNiUDM
@MONEYCHANNEL13 @AHS_media @YourAlberta https://t.co/net8OYtKsY Prove it otherwise
@moniquepot1 Ce site n’est pas fiable. Les seules études sérieuses sont recensées ici : https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@SimWorst @Bill_Buchman @mehdirhasan You should actually read the studies instead of what randos on the internet are saying. Spoiler alert: it isn't working. But guess what? There's a safe, approved and highly effective vaccine available... and it's free
@Patchoulidiver @Bill_Buchman @mehdirhasan Those studies for treating covid aren't going well tho. Ivermectin is a truly fantastic drug for treating parasites. Yes, it keeps the virus from replicating *in vitro* but trials show that it doesn't work the sam
@replouiegohmert A German study in which several German university hospitals were involved, no evidence could be found that ivermectin improves the condition of COVID-19 sufferers or reduces the number of deaths - compared to a standard treatment or a dumm
@selmuushh Nenoliedzami gan ir tas, ka ivermiktīns ir arī klīniski testēts C19 terapijā, tikai secinājumi nebija gluži tādi, kā varbūt dažiem gribētos: https://t.co/guRvdFVRzy
@ukibsg @davidthunderac1 @dockaurG Regardless of the BBC article, are there any studies which show that ivermectin works, apart from low quality or fraudulent studies? This review of the Cochrane database concluded that there were not: https://t.co/AzVXbYt
@roycaulder @mmpadellan Yes, here is the Cochran review: https://t.co/jZR0QTQRHn
@ObviousElk @rawpwr99fatboy @ArthurZork @ClayTravis @joerogan OK. I did. I would suggest that you do the same. Or read the Cochrane Library review of the studies. https://t.co/hhwINpLXjk That's subjective. Dr. Kory did in his testimony to the Senate. ht
@darby4ever @Kind_Geek @highwired2 @les_dev @RWMaloneMD early treatment backed by high-quality evidence is monoclonal antibodies. https://t.co/gs3u9eNHzs Evidence for ivermectin is lacking (see conclusion) - though dozens of studies of it in covid are un
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
@QualityTime77 @MCMikeSkywalker @CBCNews Be sure to read the author's conclusion. https://t.co/UhTw82zaIR
RT @StarRider8008: @DrTomFrieden Yet many studies seem to show that it has "significant improvements for mortality, hospitalization, recove…
@Kirvesmies83 @KorpinenLaura Koska se on hyodyton Koronaa vastaan https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@PekkaKorhonen10 @AAnalyytikko @SuskuLondon varmaan maksaa murto osan koska ei tehoa Koronaan ollenkaan. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@AAnalyytikko Koska Ivermectin ei ole toimiva laake Koronaan. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@KorpinenLaura Koska Ivermectin ei ole toimiva laake Koronaan. https://t.co/afvKbd8BpY
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
@AS12203 @Drperris1955B @tims5400 @pastorhodge @jimmy_dore I just did, your turn genius 🤣 https://t.co/YVJXFo0rLl https://t.co/5VacBnHWkM
@ShawnaDLink @Cernovich Go to internet Search “ivermectin for COVID” Find several studies on the NIH website https://t.co/MTs2mCyRMh https://t.co/kjEnCEAxJ3 https://t.co/WUhbGBpVsB Oh the irony
@PrS02072026 @ianmcd78 @Cernovich Please look at top journals like Cochrane who do the gold standard meta analysis. https://t.co/nvqwOSAByp
@i_a_mit @monoblancoatx @jimmy_dore @drsanjaygupta @donlemon @CNN So I just study the meta analysis of IVR research on Covid - and so far it’s been shown to be ineffective / inconclusive etc. Also tells what are issues with some of these research. You can
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
@johnswansonlong @ianmcd78 @Cernovich I suggest you look at meta analysis and systemic review of IVR / Covid in non predatory journals. Look at Cochrane the gold standard. https://t.co/nvqwOSAByp
@WealthWiz No / I suggest you read meta analysis and systematic review of all IVR Covid research - that’s how you make a conclusion based on hundred of papers published on the topic. Go with Cochrane the gold standard. https://t.co/nvqwOSAByp
¿𝗟𝗮 𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗮 𝗲𝘀 𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘇 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮 𝗹𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱-𝟭𝟵? https://t.co/CoiHRYNdBJ
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
@MissDemeanor6 @Heyclammy @ShibaPepe @JohnTarion @Cubbies108 @tedcruz @All100Senators @joerogan @CNN I would send a meta analysis from Cochrane about IVR / Covid and they would still bring up some shoddy paper in a predatory journal as proof that IVR works
@NiceDeb @tomselliott @donlemon @drsanjaygupta All horsesh!t data though. Rife with bias and poorly constructed observational data. So a systematic review of terribly conducted studies produces a collection of unreliable data. https://t.co/aknpz6Zhdg
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
@joeblowdirt784 @AltCyberCommand Heaven forbid you get data from the NIH - https://t.co/LqSUHfeDgP
RT @nefrorantes: “La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o ani…
“La @US_FDA no ha autorizado ni aprobado la ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención del #COVID19 en personas o animales. La ivermectina no ha demostrado ser segura ni eficaz para estas indicaciones” https://t.co/gAJh5pkyUP
@Funko_frankie @RJBraxton2 @lilandrax @drsanjaygupta @joerogan My point that there's been an upswing in calls to poison control by idiots taking the wrong medicine for a disease with an effective vaccine? We could talk pubmed, if you like. https://t.co/G
@1A_Robin @frankdp23 @mayeny_a @JackPosobiec actually if you do five minutes of research you’ll find that there’s simply not enough information about ivermectin’s treatment of covid to make a definitive statement like ‘it could’ve saved thousands.’ https
@thedogonthemoon @farmafilico @medicoybioetica @Dr_Pilgrim @DoctorSITHo @drmiguelmarcos @Medicilio @JoseMJG @flmigrones @christianperez @StopPseudo En la revisión que te han puesto al final se comenta el porque la revisión de cochrae difiere de otras 2 y
@cregishuman @MaajidNawaz @joerogan Look up the Carvallo and Egypt studies. Carvallo was one spread around a lot. Even Brett Weinstein has admitted it is likely fraudulent. Review of other studies here https://t.co/Xctb7MatwJ
@BackAgainPeeps @johnmil57943050 @tedcruz @joerogan @CNN "...we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of Ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use [of] Ivermectin for treatment or
@thedogonthemoon @medicoybioetica @Dr_Pilgrim @DoctorSITHo @drmiguelmarcos @Medicilio @JoseMJG @flmigrones @christianperez @StopPseudo @balkraix tiene muy documentado el tema de la ivermectina. https://t.co/YNMNxPKa59
@Luzdoh Ivermectin is extremely lacking in good research proving anything nearly solid, and what has been released in confirmation on it has a pretty huge amount of literature challenging it if you have the time to look into it. https://t.co/v1B4sE1A3e ht
RT @Rzecznik_URPL: @OrdoMedicus @URPLWMiPB @GCessak @AgencjaBadanMed @NaczelnaL Potwierdzamy‼️ Bazując na dziś dostępnych niedostatecznych…
@OrdoMedicus @URPLWMiPB @GCessak @AgencjaBadanMed @NaczelnaL Potwierdzamy‼️ Bazując na dziś dostępnych niedostatecznych dowodach, brak jest pewności dot. bezpieczeństwa i skuteczności iwermektyny. Konieczne są randomizowane i zaślepione badania kliniczne.
@Covid19Crusher Re: "Where we are with the ivermectin RCT data: • Hospitalization RR 0.65 [0.36-1.19] p=.16 • Mortality RR 0.73 [0.49-1.09] p=.13" Wrong values. Anyway, they can happen with a medication with no therapeutic effect 🙄 https://t.co/LBn6Ywgk
@Data_is_Louder Evidence so far on ivermectin is inconclusive: https://t.co/xrB6ZAWMyV
I'm not enthused about the Big I b/c it failed in all rigorous trials to date. Better luck in the next 30? However, the anti-I propaganda is BS-- very strong rationale to initially test: https://t.co/oNdNem7kWJ
@BarryCinders @PaulGarnerWoof Kory was dismantled ages ago. https://t.co/w3oxQ1Ps8L
@nifl_heim @VilyugaK Американскими учеными Ссылка на пабмед «No study compared ivermectin to an intervention with proven efficacy» Да и по гуглу «covid ivermectin studies» любая ссылка https://t.co/8Sww4r3wRH
@ImmortelleXIII @marcelgarrigou @KARIMAMARKHODJ1 @CorinneReverbel @OSS117_Helsinki Depuis le 23 Sept, l'ICMR (équivalent de notre HAS version Inde) à retiré l'HCQ et l'ivermectine de son protocole. La BdD Cochrane, louée parRaoult himself, dit qu'aucune é
@mtgreenee NIH has studied Ivermectin for Covid 19, and they see no improvement in quality of life when taking the anti-parasite ! https://t.co/TsLjoJ3Ecr
@Desmundo67 We already have results; the results so far are what one would expect to see for a medication that does not work. It's not our fault John Campbell and his non-experts fans avoid that reality. https://t.co/KiRaYi41LS https://t.co/kFXoh0qz0B h
@babsdallas @TexasRust @JudgeClayJ “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials.” https://t.co/DeWsuXJd5s