@peter_berghmans @vanranstmarc Neen het werkt niet. https://t.co/Vt7hmxezde
Vale a pena ler. @fabianoking https://t.co/XSRKvKsRIK
🧐
@JenniferZenda @Belinda_McBride @TimFullerton Mostly correct. It's not an anti-viral, but ivermectin does have some anti-viral action (at least in vitro). That of course does not prove it's useful in humans, either generally or for COVID-19 specifically.
@SudRadio @gayets A priori ça marche moyen quand même votre truc https://t.co/ZstFnRHcyd
RT @nickmmark: - a reputable meta-analysis by Cochrane (the gold standard) concluded “the reliable evidence available does not support the…
RT @juan_francomd: Caught in a Twitter argument over ivermectin? Trust the evidence. Here are three #FreeAccess articles you must read 👇 https://t.co/5brpWsxcJC https://t.co/li0QjkMCM5 https://t.co/3bs2pHq7QU
@terhikoulumies @MuusaK @KariTikkinen Lääkkeitä ei testata noin vaan satunnaistetuilla kokeilla. Ivermektiinistä en pidättelisi henkeäni, trialeita menossa. "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID-19 infecti
RT @sanoysalvoblog: Revisión Cochrane sobre ivermectina en COVID-19: la evidencia disponible no apoya el uso de ivermectina para el tratami…
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/wdOmNYbWOF
RT @LilRdVet2: @murrirl @thedailybeast Authors' conclusions: Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain abo…
RT @nickmmark: - a reputable meta-analysis by Cochrane (the gold standard) concluded “the reliable evidence available does not support the…
@murrirl @thedailybeast Authors' conclusions: Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. The completed studies are small and few are considered h
@TeslaM3D @JLRIII @CBSNews Can't really rely on this Meta-Analysis since one of the larger studies used in this has been pulled from publication due to flaws within the study. A better review is the Cochrane Systematic Review. https://t.co/K8PMnQslVM
@JohnMarcmail @ali__samson @calvinrobinson There is no evidence and no largescale studies that suggest Ivermectin works. Scientific opinion is that a large-scale study is a valid route, but until one is conducted in a rigorous manner, claims about Ivermec
@LovesTheWords @EmilyGorcenski @SandleDavid @jimmy_dore @kenklippenstein And it is not just Medical Doctors that do research. So not sure what the flex is but a podcaster with a lot of low info reactionary followers that distrust any thing they deem mainst
@Charlescapsicum @antoinette_news @NSWHealth @NSWAmbulance Do NOT listen to this wacko… get vaccinated! Here’s a link to a proper systematic review of ivermectin. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for
RT @sanoysalvoblog: Revisión Cochrane sobre ivermectina en COVID-19: la evidencia disponible no apoya el uso de ivermectina para el tratami…
@PemicDan @MSHopkins4 @TheresaDianeUK1 …yet with all therapeutics it had to undergo larger scale placebo based testing. It failed horribly under these conditions. Which was disappointing but we moved on. We didn’t cling to a fantasy, and go around taking l
- a reputable meta-analysis by Cochrane (the gold standard) concluded “the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19” 7/ https://t.co/rDLkkGtPA4
@space_stations @Karen_Kong_ Dude all the research shows that if it has an effect is not a life saving one, is barely different to placebo as far as it has been discovered https://t.co/aflgSVQzPF
@space_stations @Karen_Kong_ https://t.co/aflgSVQzPF basis for studing it, not basis to believe it will work
@Bob_Ballinger This is horseshit, Bob. Anyone interested in a real meta-analysis can look here: https://t.co/QiiU9rwfaV Science.
https://t.co/UdkmcySxVQ Two different articles, same source. 2 different results?
@thedailybeast Here is another https://t.co/gmHbzMZDzH
@HansSwoloDolo @hofbats @SarahLJorgensen @GaryTuchmanCNN @AC360 There is no high quality evidence that Ivermectin is effective in treating or preventing COVID-19. https://t.co/R7SeRUjNYg
@deguate @MaruLuarca Le comparto esta otra. Además, si gusta, puedo compartir muchos más. https://t.co/B2gFEmD4xk
@medusaamoon @cooldancoolman It’s a scientific news article that quotes legitimate scientists who have reviewed the data and directly links to their analysis. Lol. The data is one click away. That’s called a citation or reference. Happy to help https://t.
1) The Cochrane Review: 👉 https://t.co/WFgZr0dCCY https://t.co/yyeZPkzE3z
@SpcialTK1 @philmoi @ChristianVolle @MathieuSlama https://t.co/IPlbKJtul3 On t'a déjà répondu, prend une🤣🤣🤣 tisane pour te calmer .
@MatjazSvab Gledam, da klinične študije pravijo, da nima smisla. Tole je en peer review teh študij. https://t.co/tIBva5d90l
RT @txemacoll: Revisión Cochrane sobre ivermectina en COVID-19: la evidencia disponible no apoya el uso de ivermectina para el tratamiento…
Revisión Cochrane sobre ivermectina en COVID-19: la evidencia disponible no apoya el uso de ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención de la #COVID19 fuera de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados bien diseñados https://t.co/byfjFt8xVT via sanoysalvoblog
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @sanoysalvoblog: Revisión Cochrane sobre ivermectina en COVID-19: la evidencia disponible no apoya el uso de ivermectina para el tratami…
Revisión Cochrane sobre ivermectina en COVID-19: la evidencia disponible no apoya el uso de ivermectina para el tratamiento o la prevención de la #COVID19 fuera de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados bien diseñados https://t.co/97Fn9mB8O1
@bufordmaddog @PeterHotez @CDCgov @CDCMMWR As do most studies. The evidence is really poor. Even the studies that find significant differences are often using secondary are outcomes that specifically chosen to make ivermectin look good. Hence we say quac
@_emmanuel___ @le_Parisien C est déjà fait : https://t.co/dlJ7uDUoCb
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
@nikoCSFB @blackintheempir Morphine has been for centuries, does that means we should use it for COVID? Have you check the state of research? here is a review paper from this year on the subject: https://t.co/uq8kFz9jOW
@jdueprocess @SpeaksAndHears @AaronBlake Science IS hard for Cochrane as well, I guess? https://t.co/dtU62l8hNA
@aleanto72 @borghi_claudio @GiuliaTamagnin1 Uno come questo ad esempio https://t.co/wGVo4ixo1u
RT @s8mb: Very weird to see a GB News presenter pushing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine as Covid cures at this stage, and then citing a Y…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @Sefap_FAP: (Cochrane library) Ivermectina en la prevención y tratamiento de COVID-19: revisión sistemática. https://t.co/OHHAAqlXxP htt…
RT @Sefap_FAP: (Cochrane library) Ivermectina en la prevención y tratamiento de COVID-19: revisión sistemática. https://t.co/OHHAAqlXxP htt…
RT @robbo2885: @Fugstarnagar @zelo_street @GBNEWS @Ofcom Who cares what physicians think? unless they are specifically trained in virology…
@FrexitTV @wargonm Lisez juste les papier scientifiques. https://t.co/wpfCvJRYYj
@dshwa76 @Geminifty @TheHaguewood @AutumnDamnIt https://t.co/LLp1bwqLve Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials.
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @DaWittyWombat: @heathermcnarf @HadenWare @BenjaminPDixon Exactly, it says more large scale studies are need and has flaws as to why con…
RT @DaWittyWombat: @BenjaminPDixon The NIH has overwhelming states the ivermectin has no more effect than a placebo in large scale studies.…
@ralphscafe @JolyonMaugham @afneil @Ofcom Not according to Cochrane who found "Ivermectin compared to placebo or usual care may make little or no difference to improving outpatients' condition 14 days after treatment" though they concede that there have be
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
@fonytauci @CryanGrim @EbrilSir @kenklippenstein @jimmy_dore Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Review - Intervention Version published: 28 July 2021 {Not invitro - Summary of studies on Ivermectin} https://t.co/I22rIQISyI
@Revvy1337 @HawkeyeInDallas @socflyny @WesElyMD https://t.co/JTzMWtRcHS another meta analysis, so take it with a grain of salt (if you put garbage into a meta-analysis, you get garbage out), but the individual studies are fairly well-done, and total sample
@jimmykeating10 @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or preven
@Gintit2k21 @TinderUppal @justfranklin @jpublik Source? “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID-19 infection, but the evidence base is limited.” https://t.co/xnsqB8zJRg
@Lewislama @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention
@dorathygreig47 @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or preven
@MikeRokap @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention
@MikeRokap @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention
@Damo__T @rochelle100mph @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment
@rochelle100mph @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or preven
@SpreckoStewart @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or preven
@CokeWayneCowbo1 @Revvy1337 @WesElyMD That's why it is still tested in clinical trials, whereas Remdesivir time is already over, as well as HCQ. https://t.co/P3jobLnaRM
@jimmyj_allday @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevent
RT @zzrwood: @Anthony74247166 @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper syste…
@mattyoxide @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention
@Anthony74247166 @Peter_Fitz If you really want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or preve
@calvinrobinson He says there’s no evidence because, well, there is no evidence: https://t.co/zWjg3OpNuh https://t.co/6xvlQTOIou In some circumstances, HCQ is associated with increased mortality. Use the above info as “the science” rather than anecdote
RT @Sefap_FAP: (Cochrane library) Ivermectina en la prevención y tratamiento de COVID-19: revisión sistemática. https://t.co/OHHAAqlXxP htt…
(Cochrane library) Ivermectina en la prevención y tratamiento de COVID-19: revisión sistemática. https://t.co/OHHAAqlXxP https://t.co/mJC8JrJXAx
It's easy to detect. Masks are not there to keep us afraid. And if someone is advocating for ivermectin, Vitamin D or hydroxychloroquine they're a crank. Simple. https://t.co/zC22Z49VwX
Here's the thing. It would be great if it worked but it doesn't. If the producers say IVM doesn't work, then guess what? It doesn't work. Here's the report from Cochrane, based on multiple studies. https://t.co/V8apzPsn1M
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @styh131582: 既存の研究を網羅的に確認する事は重要ですが、こちらのサイトは質の高いレビューをするための標準的な手法を用いておらず、misleadingであると指摘されています。 https://t.co/HyTfGPKxQp https://t.co/SYkj…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podc…
Is #ivermectin effective for #COVID19? 🤔 Open-access @Cochrane_IDG systematic review: https://t.co/5oh3U6lnXJ And podcast from authors explaining the evidence: https://t.co/9mPJwQI49S https://t.co/FZWcPNMDL2
RT @s8mb: Very weird to see a GB News presenter pushing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine as Covid cures at this stage, and then citing a Y…