@Gingio5 @claudiocerasa MI risulta non sia efficace...in corsia su che tipo di paziente? E come avete misurato l'efficacia se posso chiedere? https://t.co/R6gucC8y8c
@David32856757 @yay_its_james I approve of any early treatments that are proven to work. Ivm and hcq don't... https://t.co/8qJKXy9pWS https://t.co/suqHItbgqR
RT @jason_willz1: @dense_evi RCT's found no benefit. https://t.co/ETRJ5qNIeR Cochrane didn't either https://t.co/HCFmaLb1Qr
RT @dense_evi: Earlier in the pandemic, limited studies found little preventive benefit, as concluded in this Cochrane review. The verdict…
Earlier in the pandemic, limited studies found little preventive benefit, as concluded in this Cochrane review. The verdict about its use as a treatment was more emphatic 2/8 https://t.co/9uuc6ioKb5 https://t.co/dgpG5gxpNn
@0minus_Prime n = 352 in treatment group Retrospective cohort study What was standard of care in March 2020 to May 2020? Was it consistent? Average age in control group? https://t.co/35SGvxIrjP https://t.co/3nnq482475
@RaoulVo49176831 @rynex20 https://t.co/xsbWFVeYxt C’est cadeau.. le protocole raoult n’existe pas étant donné que ds ses analyses , les patients étaient soit non traités, soit uniquement à la cloroquine soit uniquement avec l’antibio soit les deux. Et év
@DirkDig40017971 @MMeBlackSheep Ben oui, au mieux, si vous êtes capable de lire les références, l'hydroxychloroquine n'a aucun effet thérapeutique pour la COVID. Nada. Rien. Et c'est connu depuis 3 ans. https://t.co/fv0GwGMN1K
@jerome_viktor @PascalAlbanos @OJBoyau @MathieuMolimard Dans les 2 cas, vous 🙈🙉 puisque ces études existent et démontrent ce que vous ne voulez pas accepter. Le fait de demander Raoult est d'ailleurs révélateur, comme si un médoc ne marchait qu'administré
@2A_Fighter @1219ddenney @unhealthytruth @JohnKohler3 Let's start here. Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on randomized controlled trials. They are not a "cure" for COVID-19 whatsoever. https://t.co/XfN
@DespiteTheVisor @JackPearl77 @IvorMectin1 But you are, that is grade-A conspiratorial bollocks. HCQ is not effective in treating COVID-19, so there's that. https://t.co/zASK7vYruq
@DrCHuber @JeffreyRumney @robinmonotti Ashtray on a motorbike https://t.co/uaF2CgXNxG https://t.co/SiUMd1okKD https://t.co/KhgD4j80zY
@Applecross2402 @Oliviersanstom @Levan05109714 D'autres études ont conclu à l'inefficacité de l'HCQ. https://t.co/LXLvI8jZ1O
@Applecross2402 @Oliviersanstom @Levan05109714 Manque de bol pour vous, il y a eu plein d'autres études après celle-ci qui ont démontré l'inefficacité de l'hydroxychloroquine. https://t.co/LXLvI8jZ1O
@catsup821 What experiment? I've not taken any experimental drugs. I'm not eligible for trials, as I have MS. https://t.co/3578eQFDKI
@catsup821 Plenty that confirm your delusions you mean 😉 The other single line responses are all evidence free ranting, so dismissed without response, as is warranted. https://t.co/3578eQFDKI RCTs showing no evidence / discussion. Happy Xmas, cupcake.
@DomCorner3 @CPorteu @xazalbert De quelle méta parlez-vous ? Celle de Fiolet ou la prétendue méta d'Azalbert. Si c celle de Fiolet, vous déduisez qu'il y a fraude ou non si le résultat vous plaît ou non. En 2023 Cochrane confirme et cite la méta Fiolet. Pa
@fichotnicole @EtienneVerpin @AlexisPhilo Un étude frauduleuse rétractée instrumentalisée par les influmenteurs médicaux pour leur propagande. Autrement, c'est anecdotique. Ce qui l'est moins c'est que l'efficacité de l'hydrochloroquine contre la covid n'a
@fichotnicole @EtienneVerpin @AlexisPhilo La chloroquine n'était déjà plus en vente libre depuis longtemps.. Cette arrêté est très bien tombé, il a permis d'éviter de nombreux accidents d'automedication. Molécule inefficace contre la COVID. https://t.co/y0
@taipan168 @PoeBrianL You must also strongly believe that HCQ is ineffective in treating COVID-19 due to this Cochrane review: https://t.co/HfvIOubX8f
@Ahoult_Ahoult @BartholomeDLV @MartinZ_uncut Alors que l'inefficacité de l'hydrochloroquine ne fait plus débat depuis plus de 3 ans, il n'y a guère que les trolls de l'IHU de l'IHU pour continuer à essayer de faire vivre le mythe hydroxychlocon. #instabloc
@mentju4 @yoshkapundrick @MarionKoopmans "[...] wherever a single person propounds a number of unrelated denialist conjectures, poorly supported conspiracy theories, or pseudoscientific claims." https://t.co/IRtb5srACG https://t.co/WgkYkGCQxM https://t.c
@mentju4 @yoshkapundrick @MarionKoopmans Informed experts were right on HCQ/IVM. You were wrong; neither HCQ nor IVM helped. So only a gullible person would think you're competent on evaluating claims regarding 'covid origins'. https://t.co/bFbHBWQdVh ht
@yoshkapundrick @MarionKoopmans But he won't accept reality on that. He'll brush off published evidence as 'just links', demand people have a real-time discussion with him as if that's how we figure out what's accurate in science, etc. He's beyond help.
@mentju4 @yoshkapundrick @MarionKoopmans You can pretend you know who people are all you want, while Twitter suppresses your tweets. Still the case HCQ doesn't work, and you were on wrong on it as you were on ivermectin, lab leak, etc. You're a crackpot.
@pangolino57 @PhilippeMurer Merci au passage d'avoir rappelé le caractère expérimental du traitement inefficace infligé en dehors de tout cadre légal.. https://t.co/y09v9wVljo
@Corp_Raider99 @butlerofdogs @dr_handler @PEHJackson @nickdhurt @mattwridley Non-expert conspiracists are worse at evaluating evidence than are informed experts. "propounds a number of unrelated denialist conjectures, poorly supported conspiracy theories,
RT @AtomsksSanakan: https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 To me this is still one best illustrations on the non-expert conspiracist/contrarian mindset t…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 To me this is still one best illustrations on the non-expert conspiracist/contrarian mindset t…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 To me this is still one best illustrations on the non-expert conspiracist/contrarian mindset t…
https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 To me this is still one best illustrations on the non-expert conspiracist/contrarian mindset that's spread during the pandemic, in 2 steps. Step 1: Screw around as you pretend to know better than informed experts. https://t.co/abi
@LioVdc @PharmaMedic95 @raoult_didier La chloroquine ou l'hydroxychloroquine est-elle utile pour traiter les personnes atteintes de la COVID-19 ou pour prévenir l'infection chez les personnes qui ont été exposées au virus ? https://t.co/kIISccMNOr
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @angie_rasmussen Also a vaccine denialist, hydroxychloroquine peddler, etc. crank magnetism: "person propounds a numbe…
@angie_rasmussen Also a vaccine denialist, hydroxychloroquine peddler, etc. crank magnetism: "person propounds a number of unrelated denialist conjectures, poorly supported conspiracy theories, or pseudoscientific claims" https://t.co/IRtb5srACG https://
@Math3145 @MartinZ_uncut Cochrane est une source plus sérieuse.. https://t.co/y09v9wVljo
@MisteurBin @LapiGreg @astynis tu vas ramer, va falloir venir avec du RCT ou de la meta analyse. https://t.co/4jg4sb0B9K
RT @LoLoWarn: @astynis @DebunkMoutarde je suis niveau RCT et meta analyse. https://t.co/4jg4sb0B9K
@astynis @DebunkMoutarde je suis niveau RCT et meta analyse. https://t.co/4jg4sb0B9K
RT @Woodynist: @Maitre_Eolas @Olivierfente @raoult_didier @MathieuMolimard @fluidloading Adverse events are tripled compared to placebo but…
🧐 Les études Cochrane, c'est encore fiable de nos jours, @D_Deplanque ? https://t.co/oBnZBMW4iI
@Maitre_Eolas @Olivierfente @raoult_didier @MathieuMolimard @fluidloading Adverse events are tripled compared to placebo but VERY FEW SERIOUS adverse events were found. (Cochrane) https://t.co/7mn9ID3tr6 On est libre de croire une modélisation bidon non p
RT @jason_willz1: @misterchambo @cpittmore @CShoemakerMD A physician who thinks ivm or hcq has efficacy for covid? they have no efficacy fo…
RT @jason_willz1: @misterchambo @cpittmore @CShoemakerMD A physician who thinks ivm or hcq has efficacy for covid? they have no efficacy fo…
RT @jason_willz1: @CShoemakerMD READ THIS AND WEEP. ivermectin and HCQ have no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on RCT's. https://…
RT @jason_willz1: @CShoemakerMD READ THIS AND WEEP. ivermectin and HCQ have no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on RCT's. https://…
RT @jason_willz1: @CShoemakerMD READ THIS AND WEEP. ivermectin and HCQ have no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on RCT's. https://…
RT @jason_willz1: @CShoemakerMD READ THIS AND WEEP. ivermectin and HCQ have no efficacy to treat or prevent covid based on RCT's. https://…
@PacoCordoba232 @TIzuriaga @gorka_orive Cochrane sobre ambos compuestos: https://t.co/ecbRJIVMG5
@joesanders33 @001B_Betty @Marco_Piani Ivermectin didn't work, nor did HCQ. You really had no clue what you were talking about on COVID-19. https://t.co/0EXKPLgQEM https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/IDguLacBGh
@CorManu1 @LockedFab @raoult_didier Oh put... tous les clichés du troupeau : "toute la planète, t'es à jour de tes vax? Médecin de plateau, conflit d'intérêt...". Cochrane est une source reconnue du Médecin de plateau Raoult. On attend sa mise à jour, alor
@joesanders33 @PoeBrianL @plagueprose Yes, you've been paranoid + incompetent for at least 3 years. "HCQ seems rather promising" https://t.co/tba6407lMX "the Cochrane review, which is the gold standard." https://t.co/DcIRdoo51c What does the "gold stand
@joesanders33 @PoeBrianL @plagueprose You mean like your supposed "common knowledge" that hydroxychloroquine works and is "spoken about by the masses"? 🙄 You're a charlatan. https://t.co/0EXKPLgQEM https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/PfIvzuJVKz
@aaronshem @StorkOnTheCork @DafeiD @joesanders33 Re: "I suspect we could have used HCQ to get viral loads down, improve outcomes and reduce spread this winter" https://t.co/wx29b6AnOc For posterity: So many climate science contrarians turned out to be jus
@JGisSatoshi @216_Eliot_Ness @donutveclue Your link is as worthless as the similar c9ivermectin + ivmmeta websites. https://t.co/woeVbFAhBf https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF https://t.co/IPVvM
@mfarrouch @alainhoupert 🙄 Cochrane est une source validée par Raoult. Quand allez-vous comprendre ? 😔 https://t.co/JzITHMF8f5
@Pepin_De_Landen @raoult_didier 🤣 C'est la meilleure celle-là. Lisez la littérature scientifique ? https://t.co/DMCNujkx3B
RT @jason_willz1: @browt1971 @DiedSuddenly_ Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's…
@TRACEYBTHIERRY @lesnewspeoples @xazalbert @Annette_LEXA @france_soir Cochrane (comme Ioannidis) est une source validée par raoult. Moi, je ne suis pas scientifique. Alors on verra s'ils modifient leur conclusion avec l'étude belge. Mais qd seul 1 personne
@FrancoisFraiss1 @Annette_LEXA @xazalbert @france_soir Wep je parlais de Singh 2021, meme si d’autres avaient déjà pavé la route malgré toutes les vagues de dénigrement, menaces, harcèlement envers les auteurs… avec la participation active de RoncePoire/Az
@FBreject1 @GrumpyOldDoc @Doctor_Eric_B Random screenshots from who knows what studies, at least one of which predates covid by more than 5 years? LMFAO. https://t.co/tdkwq0vkot
RT @jason_willz1: @browt1971 @DiedSuddenly_ Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's…
@DiedSuddenly_ Entirely false! this is a new fraud! https://t.co/NIsN45v0zu
@Aussie_legend81 @IanCopeland5 @DrSusanOliver1 No mate, I don't listen to grifters like AFLDS. https://t.co/35SGvxIrjP https://t.co/SOJ1DiqYRt https://t.co/Uhu7JYZKyG
RT @jason_willz1: @browt1971 @DiedSuddenly_ Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's…
RT @jason_willz1: @browt1971 @DiedSuddenly_ Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's…
RT @jason_willz1: @browt1971 @DiedSuddenly_ Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID-19 based on RCT's…
157/E Rest of that thread is telling. Peddling the failed treatment chloroquine (2/E): https://t.co/DMkwLTjUM0 Even the charlatan Shellenberger corrects him, supported by Musk's CDC link: ~1 million dead https://t.co/FDSHLulsiQ https://t.co/r0Y1nNy9Dy
@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright Your fellow lab leak conspiracists make the connection themselves. https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/AWuZfiQLfz https://t.co/0purhwdnDV
@Phil_Frog2 @CanardCe @Levan_Ivanidze @tristanmf Vous continuez des affirmations sans aucune autre source que "j'ai raison et vous ça tort". Je vous renvoie donc vers les revues Cochrane, que Saint Raoult lui-même citait comme référence mondiale (jusqu'à c
@PerrinMarc7 @EdmondDOVIDIO @WAntillaise @nathanpsmad Absolument rien à voir, je parle de covid19 et de in vivo, pratiquement tout marche "in vitro" exemple" l acide chlorhydrique c est 100% et en quelques secondes; Voilà un fait établi indiscutable: https
@michelRIBET1 @Gurhal1 @barriere_dr Oui, il a qq subordonnés autour de lui. Et alors? La science c pas une opinion. Cochrane, source approuvée par Raoult, confirme ce qu'on sait depuis 3 ans. Mais les fans de DR y croient encore et insultent, agressent, mé
@michelRIBET1 @Gurhal1 @barriere_dr Ben... pas vraiment puisque, quand on ne comprend pas on gobe n'importe quoi et on devient manipulable. Poutine se sert des complotistes français à qui il fait gober des infox pour saper les gouvernements. Donc les colla
@mariobi2000 @Alexa2B74 @JulienFort4bis @MicrobiomDigest @SciReports @raoult_didier @IHU_Marseille @SmutClyde Attention de ne pas trop jouer avec les synthèses de Cochrane, car on en trouve pleins d'autres qui montrent en autre que: l'ivermectine ne fonct
@BarryESharp @GidMK @gtuckerkellogg @shallit43 @CureusInc No need to pretend you're going to engage in good faith, sealion, especially when you're still repeating typical denialist myths like that vaccines are experimental (even though they passed phase 3
@BarryESharp @WanderLight2020 @gtuckerkellogg @shallit43 @CureusInc @GidMK They're vaccines, and they've not experimental since they passed phase 3 RCTs. You really are a disingenuous conspiracist incapable of honestly learning anything on the science top
@shallit43 @BarryESharp @gtuckerkellogg @CureusInc They have the warped mind of a conspiracy theorist. No evidence is going to get through to them. It's like dealing with someone who'll descend into paranoid ranting to pretend the virus SARS-CoV-2 does not
@trillionofcells @Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright All that happened is you showed you're an non-expert, incompetent conspiracy theorist who doesn't understand the evidence pyramid. https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/OZsN0AmIwe https://t.co/ukWQRzZe2j
RT @jason_willz1: @VigilantFox zelenko was a big pharma shill promoting drugs (hcq) that don't work for covid. https://t.co/ETRJ5qNIeR htt…
RT @jason_willz1: @VigilantFox zelenko was a big pharma shill promoting drugs (hcq) that don't work for covid. https://t.co/ETRJ5qNIeR htt…
RT @jason_willz1: @VigilantFox zelenko was a big pharma shill promoting drugs (hcq) that don't work for covid. https://t.co/ETRJ5qNIeR htt…
@DuvaleroyJ @CLeniata @Al12b1 @MartinZ_uncut Mais oublie Pfizer si c'est le problème. Tu as Moderna, Novavax, le Sanofi-Pasteur... Tu as le choix😉 Et non, HCQ, IVM ne fonctionnent pas sur la covid (sauf sur des sites créées pour l'occase par des pro-life c
RT @mjterborg: Dus jullie vinden een retrospectieve studie in 350 patienten beter bewijs dan een review van 8500 patienten die deelnamen aa…
RT @mjterborg: Dus jullie vinden een retrospectieve studie in 350 patienten beter bewijs dan een review van 8500 patienten die deelnamen aa…
RT @mjterborg: Dus jullie vinden een retrospectieve studie in 350 patienten beter bewijs dan een review van 8500 patienten die deelnamen aa…
Dus jullie vinden een retrospectieve studie in 350 patienten beter bewijs dan een review van 8500 patienten die deelnamen aan randomized controlled trials met HCQ? https://t.co/IgmtXorZV7
RT @Manolotabaiba1: @amvtw @DrLejarazu No te vale ningun estudio, sigue con la Hidroxicloroquina Se usa en enfermedades autoinmunes como lu…
@amvtw @DrLejarazu No te vale ningun estudio, sigue con la Hidroxicloroquina Se usa en enfermedades autoinmunes como lupus, nunca contra el Covid. No lo leeras pero te paso meta estudio publicado en Cochrane. https://t.co/mmJtic7QfM https://t.co/Kq3mO2gJt
@gorskon @tenebra99 @vpknerd @weldeiry @GrumpyOldDoc @t1pnl Looks like Risch fell into the 'contrarian maverick' hole that leads to denialism, akin to Peter Duesberg. https://t.co/hI1EpJpmAE https://t.co/7abYecLY2U https://t.co/uw2DLiHIig https://t.co/wDk
@EusebeRioche Ah lala, toujours les mêmes rengaines 🙄 ben oui, les chiffres sont là, inattaquable. Vous dites des âneries. Restez dans le déni 😏 D'ailleurs vous ne répondez pas : quels médocs ? L'HCQ ? https://t.co/JzITHMF8f5