RT @TheSGEM: @kenjaques @mihill68 @CaulfieldTim @EMManchester @BMJ_EBM The relevant (higher quality) scientific evidence doesn’t support us…
@kenjaques @mihill68 @CaulfieldTim @EMManchester @BMJ_EBM The relevant (higher quality) scientific evidence doesn’t support use outside of an RCT. In contrast, the best evidence supports prevention (vaccination). EBM is to use the “best” evidence not j
@havyhh @JesseKellyDC Several RCTs have proven its efficacy against viral infections. https://t.co/jA5N7KRtoa
@Concheddu @nalicasecret @Sarah41659531 @Pierre_GTIL @TPMP Je suis un troll mais je ne suis pas épidémiologiste. Pour l’instant aucune étude fiable ne valide l’efficacité de l’ivermectine. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@Torresacas @MsDanaMA @blazedbayman @Redbird1978_ @JacobBSims @thehill It is of course ineffective/useless for covid. https://t.co/jjQ4lQ8iuV
@blazedbayman @MsDanaMA @Redbird1978_ @JacobBSims @thehill The 2011 study you cite, which would not pass peer review in the west has no bearing on Covid. however, the gold standard in medicine, the Cochran review, finds no/zero evidence that it is effectiv
@jord1got @KenRmmltd @JacobBSims @thehill @BBCWorld And here is the definitive conclusion from the Cochran study, the gold standard in medicine, showing no evidence. https://t.co/jjQ4lQ8iuV
@jord1got @KenRmmltd @JacobBSims @thehill @BBCWorld For the reading adverse, here is the actual research. here, showing no evidence. https://t.co/txp5dgUFCc
@RobertVonB1 @janpeck @ScottAdamsSays This study is interesting. I do see recovery intervals, but the shortest interval recorded is seven days. Standard recovery time? By this data a recovery of say 1-3 days, would be significant but significance negated b
@Schnurpit @JarradKevin @BretWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg @clairlemon Here are six research publications on the association between the use of Ivermectin and COVID: https://t.co/pBkxAag2iU https://t.co/Y66YkcWF1W https://t.co/mlScmyeAp7 https://t.co/5arK6RCt7T
@RissanenMarkus @kimvaisanen Mene ja tiedä…
@Cryptic_Finn @CpTheorist 5. ei käytetä vaan loisien hoitoon. 6. hassua, ei löydy noita tutkimuksia, etkä laittanut niihin linkkiä, mutta löytyy tutkimukset jotka osoittavat ettei siitä ole hyötyä Koronan hoidossa. linkki https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@SoupisF Archifaux https://t.co/BfJNwvxbv9
@ReinierGerrits1 @MarcBonten https://t.co/bEHy7AeqdM geeft een overzicht
Faux Ce n'est pas le nombre d'études qui compte mais la méthodologie de chaque étude Mise au point de la Cochrane https://t.co/BfJNwvxbv9
Faux Lisez cela, qui est un bon bilan des études https://t.co/BfJNwvxbv9
@ChiLaiLee @mikaniikko @Sukkola Hopo hopo, Ivermektiinista vain ei ole apua Koronaan kuten tutkimukset osoittavat, loytyy linkista. https://t.co/hKmwVOMpy0
@ChiLaiLee @mikaniikko @Sukkola Hopo hopo, Ivermeksttinista vain ei ole apua Koronaan kuten tutkimukset osoittavat, loytyy linkista. https://t.co/CcowGeYI3g
@myytinkertojat Ivermektiinista ei ole apua Koronaan kuten näistä tutkimuksista voitte lukea. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@cbch54898101 Maybe because it's worked for about 40 years: https://t.co/hFRNban7xQ
@W85850613 @DrPomidor @cb21354 @thiruvetti @Perky_Nana @diekarasu @BenRothenberg https://t.co/JdWdA8yzEE Here's a review article of the studies carried out on ivermectin. Found no conclusive evidence, and later most of the supporting studies were found to
Ivermectin has been used effectively agains SARS-CoV2 but alas, "No study compared ivermectin to an intervention with proven efficacy." https://t.co/vUUO2xutWH
@mikaniikko @Sukkola Milloin ymmärrät syy ja seuraus suhteita??? Tutkimukset kun eivät puolla väitettäsi. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@Vince37951753 @tcabarrus Il est encore possible que l’ivermectine soit un traitement efficace puisqu’un certain nombre d’études sont encore en cours. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r
@ytzmaya @darkmoonselina Laura está muy mal. Pero el aviso de la FDA dice que se están haciendo estudios sobre la ivermectina. Si se usa debe ser formas para consumo humano en combinación con otros medicamentos. https://t.co/Elu8R49Med Más info: https:/
@Sukkola Tästä cochrane metatutkimuksesta siis kyse: https://t.co/Fc388AXC07
@AdnAlternative @chrisbiggin Studies have already been carried out: https://t.co/SKH7nKbAsO
@cryptostanley1 @hang10wannabe @DublinSkol @jordanbpeterson I'll look at serious, peer reviewed studies. Such as this meta-analysis: https://t.co/r6fg6kLtaQ
@hwpeters77hotm @FrankPeeters4 .... Elens? Die niet weet wat echt onderzoek is en valse hoop geeft met medicatie die niet werkt? Die?? Echt niet! 😖 https://t.co/Ipch4n9LIN
@horsdubocal @nathanpsmad "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials. " https://t.co/Sb4x2r53iA
@FamularoJoel @GidMK Correct. So meta analysis? Even meta analysis of the meta analyses. I find that more persuasive. Or is your formula: 1 meta analysis + anecdotes > 2 meta analyses? https://t.co/xWdeXcmFRw https://t.co/pbDxIytf3b
@JamesArthurXV @DroletRenee @haldol @annedeblois J'ai lu cette étude de l'INESSS. Elle est très bien faite, et les conclusions vont dans le même sens que cette revue systématique Cochrane, soit le plus haut standard en revues de littérature en santé. https
@LoisLane51 @abcnews "Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality." https://t
celle là ? non . donc Dites moi que le Dr Simon. pas menti . IL YA DES ÉTUDES RANDOMISÉES QUIPROUVE L’EFFICACITÉ DE IVERMECTIN !!! Tabarnac vous êtes rendu fous furieux dans le mensonge !! Comment vous faites pour dormir ???? https://t.co/KG0PzCsKKw
parfait ! maintenant allez y et dites moi que celle là ne l’est pas . btw si vous aviez lu , ce sont TOUS des essais randomisées. https://t.co/KG0PzCsKKw
@CaulfieldTim @ChrisEnsingCBC Another good one to post under the "Name1234567" accounts that just spit "ivermectin" as a reply and nothing else (as they're bots doing it millions of times) is the Cochrane review with the outstanding title. Then block the f
@ReaverTeknoGods @Tanelihamalaine @iltalehti_fi Ivermectiinistä ei kyllä löydy mitään tutkittua apua Koronaan. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@springphul @EliSuisse @ZStadtfux Hier kann man nachlesen, was rauskommt, wenn man diese Ivermectin-Sache seriös angeht. https://t.co/H0G3S1vaUu
@EliSuisse @ZStadtfux Gegen Krätze hilft es, ja. Dass es im Menschen gegrn Covid wirkt, konnte _nicht_ nachgewiesen werden. https://t.co/H0G3S1vaUu
@denisps76 https://t.co/FTPQ4leTAS Boa sorte fígado de aço
@majorgabdf @juniorro16 @JornalOGlobo Chora bolsonazista https://t.co/LFAhEikvy7
@WingTransparent @GoingGrink93 @Hasan_JF Not a blogpost. It's just an analysis written by an expert in the field. If you want an actual peer reviewed scientific study here it is. https://t.co/2rupV6riK6
@cupicake13 @PhreedomGuy @JoshWalkos @alykatzz This is the gold standard for reviews in evidence based evidence. The conclusions on Ivermectin being used as a therapeutic in the treatment of CV-19 is weak. This is what our FDA will not approve Ivermectin
@FaulknerFocus why don't you report on false Ivermectin claims coming from republicans? https://t.co/j3i88N3Lpk
@DTArchive345 @Eulisis42 @t0m4r53 @PierreKory @joerogan Shit ton of garbage in that site, hun. Here read a gold standard meta analysis https://t.co/2SHc2Dz6fO
@tenezduchocolat @marc_freymuth @YvesPDB @BFMTV L’approval du remdesivir était une connerie. Autant ne pas refaire la même avec d’autres traitements inefficaces https://t.co/TJof9HC91W
Not just from India look at here sources 👇🏾
@Gaby98378467 @EmanuelaGavrila @declan1968 @PierreKory @DjokerNole @LakovosJustice @Gerard39delaney How much evidence has emerged for the use of #ivermectine against #SARSCoV2 since July? @cochranecollab https://t.co/3lQ6gpVpAc https://t.co/D1vUuNzimW
RT @PhilB6vis: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 28/07/21 | Maria Popp et al | Cochrane Library https://t.co/rtjNA2McWB Con…
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 28/07/21 | Maria Popp et al | Cochrane Library https://t.co/rtjNA2McWB Concludes completed studies at 26 May 2021 are small & few of high quality, so do not support the use of ivermectin for treatment o
@JWilshaus @malchir @argosonderzoekt Jolanda, als je niet leest wat we je toesturen, heeft dit gesprek weinig zin meer. Die Cochrane reviews omvatten óók prospectieve studies. RCTs zijn namelijk altijd prospectief. En ze hebben óók naar early treatment
@barbout @BuildUpRDNs I not aware of Dr. Kory’s difficulties with using Dex. Must consider efficacy and safety. The evidence does not support the efficacy of IVM for #COVID19. My expert opinion as a researcher & medical doctor aligns with the @coch
@WingTransparent @GoingGrink93 @Hasan_JF Scientific research has proven that there is no benefit to treating COVID-19 with Ivermectin. In other words it's completely ineffective according to the scientists. https://t.co/2rupV6riK6
@JWilshaus @malchir Jeetje, Jolanda. Je valt in herhaling. De artikelen die we hieronder met je deelden, zijn systematic reviews. D.w.z. dat er gezocht is naar gepubliceerde studies en dat de resultaten daarvan samen beoordeeld zijn. Je “gerandomiseerd o
@Eromero077 @freedomofwhat @DarkHorse048 @GIrwinRacing Why is it being limited? Limited in what way? A lot of studies have been discredited from what I’ve seen, and reviews of RCTs have shown that the evidence of any effectiveness is inconclusive - here’s
@TheophileBurlet @FChampart @rene_chiche Bof, le nombre d'études fondées sur des traitements in vitro ou sur l'animal https://t.co/NCqtbVg1fA
@filipe_rafaeli @Ben_Hur_Lopes @oatila Base de dados Cochrane, que usa artigos de qualidade. https://t.co/ZSgRiBBkeR
@PertaPetri @andrewickstroem Edelleen, jos viitsit lukea koko jutun, lääkäri kirjoitti reseptin mutta ei sanonut/luvannut mitään että sillä olisi mitään vaikutusta mihinkään. Ja katsos, sehän pitää yhtä tutkimusten kanssa. Niitä voit lukea tästä. https://t
@ESGCanQueSherby La justice a peu à voir avec la science. Voici l'état de la science à propos de l'ivermectine. https://t.co/2TM3Mt0WBD
@IsoHenkka "We are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality." Eli ei taida olla hyötyä käytöstä. https://t.co/948iS4BRGu
@ytengra Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19 https://t.co/GV2U1bAE1K
@JWilshaus @HaexMireille @groenlinks @fvdemocratie @FleurAgemaPVV Hier nogmaals die review van Cochrane, recent door Jan Bonte bewijs van het allerhoogste niveau genoemd. Ben benieuwd of je iets op de methode hebt op te merken 😊 https://t.co/7gyKd5oCOE
@Twij81 @rationnelitude @dressing_code69 un récapitulatif de la litterature scientifique sur le sujet: (publication vérifier par des pairs): https://t.co/lctO7SADfu
@TomEdelkowski @Calldere @13julie12 2/2 nachweisen können, bzw. keine signifikanten Unterschiede zu einem Placebo feststellen konnten. https://t.co/CADGhmUvNo
@XanaLady @lopezbreamaria @BasketValor @MaxTena1 Revisiones de los estudios realizados con Ivermectin sugieren que hay poca o muy poca evidencia de su efectividad. https://t.co/GD5zwQsC75 https://t.co/14MvNHsxbg
@Juha_Korh2 Ei juha, tällaisissa asioissa ei "uskota" lääkäriin, joka jutun mukaan ei ole mitään apua luvannutkaan. Ja katsos, sehän on yhteneväistä tutkimusten mukaan. Ne on ne ainoat joita luetaan. https://t.co/Fp9RSrTci1
@kimvaisanen ”Ivermectin may have little or no effect compared to placebo or standard of care on the number of participants with symptoms resolved up to 14 days” https://t.co/Lx8wfUE4Vp
Sterker, we weten vrij zeker dat deze middelen *niet* werken. Zie bijv. https://t.co/7gyKd571q4 https://t.co/SLMDJwLJS7 Wil je tóch kijken of deze middelen zinnig zijn, dat zou je dat in een goed opgezette, double blinded, placebo controlled randomized tr
@ExposeDaTruthMN @Higgles111 @lucasward33 @timberanddamp https://t.co/fOkKe1KFMM You mean this kind of science or stuff from YouTube. Would agree natural immunity is better then the vaccine, but you've got a much higher risk of severe disease/death with i
@jarho_jan @PatrikWilska ”Ivermectin may have little or no effect compared to placebo or standard of care on the number of participants with symptoms resolved up to 14 days” https://t.co/Lx8wfUE4Vp
@K_Alander ”Ivermectin may have little or no effect compared to placebo or standard of care on the number of participants with symptoms resolved up to 14 days” https://t.co/Lx8wfUE4Vp
@redstarfan61 @LauOyarzabal @DrEliDavid Here's one https://t.co/6TKdTK8MAs In short, based on studies thus far, ivermectin works on covid in test tubes, not in humans.
@KlariPhilippe @CTrivalle @lemondefr Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials. https://t.co/wqJqRZM9ed
@ayembls @PierreKiroul13 @DocAmine_ Il est encore possible que l’ivermectine soit un traitement efficace puisqu’un certain nombre d’études sont en cours mais pour l’instant aucune étude sérieuse ne valide son efficacité. https://t.co/hHJ022kr9r