@valueterminal @Mangan150 From the review of 8 clinical trials ◾1 life saved. ◾200 false positives. ◾10 women unnecessarily treated https://t.co/xORwcX4PLn
التصوير الاشعاعي لسرطان الثدي: قد تعيش المرأة سنوات من الشك والضائقة النفسية بسبب نتائج ايجابية كاذبة https://t.co/xesDKurJvH
Sobre rastreamento de câncer de mama: "para cada 2.000 mulheres que fazem mamografia de rotina ao longo de 10... https://t.co/kajuetwa7S
RT @Mangan150: Mammography may not lower breast cancer death, but those who get screened get 20% more mastectomies. https://t.co/8NIJK4JyZ0
RT @Mangan150: Mammography may not lower breast cancer death, but those who get screened get 20% more mastectomies. https://t.co/8NIJK4JyZ0
Not at all surprised. https://t.co/xan7Znn0WR
Mammography may not lower breast cancer death, but those who get screened get 20% more mastectomies. https://t.co/8NIJK4JyZ0
The breast screening dilemma. Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/gz45WBe5HE (via juice.li) https://t.co/Y5HmhbsC67
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
RT @ahalbadr: Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/PyFi8ZUW7Q
Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/ZHRvtOU2Ju
Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/EbSzaeDCNw
Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/cWyDMoQHGY
@Ascl_Pios @AssamGunpowder @Gbdivers Pour le coup, pour le sein je n'ai pas fouillé et je n'ai que ça : https://t.co/4NjdMUTRx9 : baisse de la mortalité mais augm des surdiag.
RT @NATROM: コクランの乳がんのレビュー[ https://t.co/WajnnhzFLw ]。1人の乳がん死を避けるにつき、2000人が検診を受け、200人以上が偽陽性による重大な心理的ストレスを受け、10人が不必要な治療を受ける。
RT @NATROM: コクランの乳がんのレビュー[ https://t.co/WajnnhzFLw ]。1人の乳がん死を避けるにつき、2000人が検診を受け、200人以上が偽陽性による重大な心理的ストレスを受け、10人が不必要な治療を受ける。
RT @NATROM: コクランの乳がんのレビュー[ https://t.co/WajnnhzFLw ]。1人の乳がん死を避けるにつき、2000人が検診を受け、200人以上が偽陽性による重大な心理的ストレスを受け、10人が不必要な治療を受ける。
RT @NATROM: コクランの乳がんのレビュー[ https://t.co/WajnnhzFLw ]。1人の乳がん死を避けるにつき、2000人が検診を受け、200人以上が偽陽性による重大な心理的ストレスを受け、10人が不必要な治療を受ける。
コクランの乳がんのレビュー[ https://t.co/WajnnhzFLw ]。1人の乳がん死を避けるにつき、2000人が検診を受け、200人以上が偽陽性による重大な心理的ストレスを受け、10人が不必要な治療を受ける。
@DrBridgetOBrien @IMO_IRL @WalleyRay segments of articles on studies are not useful - as previous https://t.co/e0myTpKPVt comes down against blanket screening.
@DrBridgetOBrien @IMO_IRL @WalleyRay Cochrane largely came down on Breast Screening being beneficial and actually caused more harm https://t.co/e0myTpKPVt Hardly gender bias
RT @cselgreco: Screening for breast cancer with mammography - Gøtzsche - 2013 - The Cochrane Library - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/1c…
Screening for breast cancer with mammography - Gøtzsche - 2013 - The Cochrane Library - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/1clxmLWInS
A good #informedconsent is also needed for any #screening https://t.co/wNK5PAyAzG
@Taniel @DrJenGunter @SenPatRoberts perhaps mammography shouldn't be included ...https://t.co/OtF6ZYmjsB
@SenPatRoberts Actually, the other proposed cuts are far more dangerous. Evidence for mammography is underwhelming. https://t.co/y67l6dWqYb
Wasting money. More suffering Screening for breast cancer with mammography https://t.co/h12AIi33NL @DrEricHoskins @UofT @cancersociety @CNN
RT @agargmd: @LifeLighted @joegooding @PurpleSproutCaf Screening for cancer isn't always black and white. The truth is murky: https://t.co/…
@LifeLighted @joegooding @PurpleSproutCaf Screening for cancer isn't always black and white. The truth is murky: https://t.co/QLZhtW4fYm
@ESchattner @Vilavaite Here you have mortality and mastectomy data of randomised trials. https://t.co/KlMXGaeaIS https://t.co/yCO2vNtxQ7
@MedBunker ma davvero https://t.co/LH6krcKMTR dice che "su 11 donne 10 sono falso positivo"? Hameriani lo citano per regressioni spontanee
@franceinter Sources: https://t.co/XBt55Xh8d8
@judithpennarts @cordekroon Zie ook deze samenvatting wetenschap van de Cochrane: https://t.co/X9vVacSd4Z
Conclusie: het nut van screening is wellicht te klein om gedachteloos de oproep bevolkingsonderzoek op te volgen. https://t.co/BjUI9dWLaM
RT @cordekroon: Ik schrik weer van de conclusie over #borstkankerscreening @cochranecollab https://t.co/iPHMYa7Hcv https://t.co/TKTdowGIk9
RT @cordekroon: Ik schrik weer van de conclusie over #borstkankerscreening @cochranecollab https://t.co/iPHMYa7Hcv https://t.co/TKTdowGIk9
RT @cordekroon: Ik schrik weer van de conclusie over #borstkankerscreening @cochranecollab https://t.co/iPHMYa7Hcv https://t.co/TKTdowGIk9
Ik schrik weer van de conclusie over #borstkankerscreening @cochranecollab https://t.co/iPHMYa7Hcv https://t.co/TKTdowGIk9
Wanneer komt de update op de website @rivm #mammografie https://t.co/mDwgkW6NSt https://t.co/MM1t7jgoNV https://t.co/0aY8YJ2WpH
Find the latest #Cochrane review on breast cancer screening https://t.co/rLauvxHmQt #CochraneEvidence
@SecretStef This is also interesting. https://t.co/WDAVZG4qjw
"is likely that the absolute effect of breast cancer screening today #is smaller than in the trials" https://t.co/BgNx3DuzaW
@Rob_hero @Gert_van_Dijk https://t.co/DWf6NbhcbK Het staat hier uitgelegd, ze hebben 7 onderzoeken bekeken (600.000 mensen)
RT @Alis_8496: Realidad https://t.co/D6hqNOT9i1 https://t.co/odqokZTn35
RT @HowardNWhite: Story promoting breast screening on @BBCWorld does not mention potential harms. See @cochranecollab review https://t.co/4…
RT @HowardNWhite: Story promoting breast screening on @BBCWorld does not mention potential harms. See @cochranecollab review https://t.co/4…
Story promoting breast screening on @BBCWorld does not mention potential harms. See @cochranecollab review https://t.co/4Q89YHoOjx
And yet "the most reliable information showed that screening did not reduce breast cancer mortality." https://t.co/TQvi7iyT7w https://t.co/C6OHQSEzcD
@Cheryl_Cruwys @ESchattner Showed my wife Cochrane lay summary & to my relief she declined mammography invite. https://t.co/2Dh9edSqMh
@ESchattner Indeed. But it is consistent with the best randomised trial evidence. https://t.co/2Dh9edSqMh
RT @jimgthornton: @ESchattner Who said don't tell women about screening? Tell 'em truth. Doesn't work. https://t.co/WJFAszw9FF
@DoctorYou1 Medical research shows routine mammography has no benefit. Check Cochran review published in 2013 https://t.co/8ZZLeYbRYO
@ESchattner Who said don't tell women about screening? Tell 'em truth. Doesn't work. https://t.co/WJFAszw9FF
P values. Bayes. Stuff to think about. (Don't ask about DoH early call breast screening programme - dear me no! https://t.co/Pq8mf6vKqj) https://t.co/PsMmesqfc6
@pilarrmontalban @doctorazua me gustaría ver evidencia en favor del cribado para comparar con ésta y otras https://t.co/RTcoK0wsjd
Combien de surdiagnostic sur ces 49 000 ? #CancerRose https://t.co/XBt55Xh8d8 https://t.co/LkKJ6cOJRJ https://t.co/nYgSx7t9ky
@gallir es que el tipo tb escribió entre otras cosas esto (con más gente), con múltiples procesos de revisión: https://t.co/QaOO1DZjV1
@mrsangfroid Voici le résumé français https://t.co/QjD1ubONKA et la version intégrale https://t.co/UZ56zCkLOs :)
@NCBC_BreastCare @mastobgin Total ca mortality incl. breast ca 10yrs (RR 1.02) All-cause mortality 13yrs (RR 0.99) https://t.co/UkfZHqydyj
@embryomedicine Η περισσότερο αξιόπιστη βάση ιατρικών δεδομένων, μπορεί να επιλύσει άμεσα τις όποιες διαφωνίες. https://t.co/O510xhCw9y
@qmph_es http://t.co/HS2sCa6eNi @AdereGomez @HelenaMatute @naiapereda
@kennylinafp @TheEvidenceDoc @peterubel @kevinmd My friend had similar over treatment of DCIS. Show http://t.co/UkfZHqydyj to all u can.
@DocYeyo @JuanGrvas very little or no reduction in the incidence of advanced cancers with screening http://t.co/m2XKYYqhvn
@healthandcents @DrMartyFox Mammography doesn't save lives anyway. http://t.co/NXVS1GnFbU
one of Prof Gotzsche's papers on breast screening http://t.co/oLph4aqRLO #3DInvestigates
one of Prof Gotzsche's papers on breast screening http://t.co/oLph4aqRLO #3DInvestigates
@Dr_JB_Blanc @LehmannDrC @MahlerNord @DDupagne @BonoKarlito ça doit être làhttp://t.co/S8RYvOzf3o
@qmph_es @jmgomezsoriano Los metanálisis que sólo incluyen ECAs con riesgo bajo de sesgo son - favorables al cribado http://t.co/w141Jyzqyl
Mammograms 15% Good 30% Bad https://t.co/r030Dzcs4B
@DrAseemMalhotra @clarercgp @iona_heath @CNagpaul Worth posting link to Gotzsche's updated @CochraneLibrary review http://t.co/WZP6szvYgf
@zaidirad @RichDuszak @BubbAllenMD @CancerGeek if robust as claim it could change the #Cochrane review http://t.co/nMwgz2cSY6 #gamechanger
@zaidirad @RichDuszak @BubbAllenMD @CancerGeek if robust as claim it could change the #Cochrane review http://t.co/nMwgz2cSY6 #gamechanger
@zaidirad @RichDuszak @BubbAllenMD @CancerGeek if robust as claim it could change the #Cochrane review http://t.co/nMwgz2cSY6 #gamechanger
@GabrielScallyThe Screening trials...did not find red'n in total cancer mortality, including breast, after 10 y. http://t.co/oIpFalTgZr
Screening for breast cancer with mammography - The Cochrane Library - Gøtzsche - Wiley Online... http://t.co/ORrAZobTve
Screening for breast cancer with mammography - The Cochrane Library - Gøtzsche - Wiley Online... http://t.co/30USWtS1C9
@WePublicHealth But if patients die from something else instead? All-cause mortality same for both groups: http://t.co/exwuEckFv7
@trentrural @_sal_roberts @RosieBogle Cochrane2013: http://t.co/Yq1YePunVX Consider harms of #overdiagnosis and no all-cause mortality diff
#mammografi risk/nytta-box baserad på Götzsche&Kristensens Cochranereview omdiskuterad http://t.co/zPQXVaSnR4 Se oxå http://t.co/pkcRZdPuhC
Screening for breast cancer with #mammography, Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen K 2013 http://t.co/ppXpW9jEMO
Risks & benefits of #mammograms must be clearly outlined for women attending screening http://t.co/A8V7xlnmuY