In seinem aktuellen review stellt auch das renommierte Cochrane Library fest: "Die Verwendung einer N95/P2 (=FFP2)-Atemschutzmaske macht im Vergleich zu einer medizinischen/chirurgischen Maske wahrscheinlich keinen oder nur einen geringen Unterschied". htt
RT @Lugverbotszone: Es gibt derzeit keine #Evidenz dafür, daß #FFP2-#Masken, einen signifikanten Nutzen gegenüber einfachen chirurgischen M…
RT @Lugverbotszone: Es gibt derzeit keine #Evidenz dafür, daß #FFP2-#Masken, einen signifikanten Nutzen gegenüber einfachen chirurgischen M…
RT @Lugverbotszone: Es gibt derzeit keine #Evidenz dafür, daß #FFP2-#Masken, einen signifikanten Nutzen gegenüber einfachen chirurgischen M…
RT @Lugverbotszone: Es gibt derzeit keine #Evidenz dafür, daß #FFP2-#Masken, einen signifikanten Nutzen gegenüber einfachen chirurgischen M…
RT @Lugverbotszone: Es gibt derzeit keine #Evidenz dafür, daß #FFP2-#Masken, einen signifikanten Nutzen gegenüber einfachen chirurgischen M…
RT @Lugverbotszone: Es gibt derzeit keine #Evidenz dafür, daß #FFP2-#Masken, einen signifikanten Nutzen gegenüber einfachen chirurgischen M…
RT @Lugverbotszone: Es gibt derzeit keine #Evidenz dafür, daß #FFP2-#Masken, einen signifikanten Nutzen gegenüber einfachen chirurgischen M…
RT @Lugverbotszone: Es gibt derzeit keine #Evidenz dafür, daß #FFP2-#Masken, einen signifikanten Nutzen gegenüber einfachen chirurgischen M…
RT @Lugverbotszone: Es gibt derzeit keine #Evidenz dafür, daß #FFP2-#Masken, einen signifikanten Nutzen gegenüber einfachen chirurgischen M…
@LizJarvisUK The evidence does NOT suggest masks attenuate the spread of respiratory viruses (https://t.co/ee1NrR3HGo); sad as this situation is for you, masks have no bearing on it.
@HipGnostic369 @SockMike @IAmTheActualET Here is a recent 2020 review from the prestigious Cochrane: "The pooled results of randomised trials did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks during seas
@catherinemep @GreatDismal There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask. https://t.co/xQfVciVDgP
@cathy_finnis @LindaSk49118554 How dare you suggest the disabled remove themselves from normal social life. Moreover, evidence does not suggest masks attenuate spread of respiratory viruses: https://t.co/ee1NrQM6OQ https://t.co/svdGnKpn9o
@crabb_vicki @mamasaurusMeg @PlumProfessora @eliowa @WholesalerH @justin_hart My take away from this meta, which I have read several times, is that we simply don’t know. There is no strong evidence. Indeed, it’s consistent with the Nov 2020 Cochrane revie
@Lukasz_Malignus @pisorgpl Trud pracy na oddziałach COVIDowych nie oznacza, że trzeba było zamykać gospodarkę. Restrykcje zarówno maseczki (https://t.co/r5sT9ka2nF) i lockdowny (https://t.co/5kxu1xdkgi) nie mają dowodów na skuteczność, natomiast te drugie
@khanaftab9003 @DrTomFrieden Please doctor, share a RCT that shows the efficacy % of masks? Then explain why they don’t work when compliance is over 90% in CA, WA, UK, FR, etc. This analysis weighs all the studies and can’t find a benefit. https://t.co/
@crabb_vicki @mamasaurusMeg @PlumProfessora @eliowa @WholesalerH @justin_hart You are conflating *universal* mandates with using masks in high risk settings. As for community masking, this discussion didn't start in 2020: https://t.co/pd6TpD1IuN
@GarySlegg @Therealscienti1 @MichaelYeadon3 >> As a lot of people do no longer trust in WHO, Cochraine repeated this, 20+ doctors searched for all the available scientific literature. Spoiler: no effect for mask; some effect for hand washing https://
@itisjustmebabe @nothing4realk @EmilyPetro22 @Stretch1931 @Newsweek @TwitterSupport Wrong. I linked to 2 articles and 2 CEBM review links. The two articles: https://t.co/5DsR5wvUcx https://t.co/pd6TpD1IuN
@itisjustmebabe @nothing4realk @EmilyPetro22 @Stretch1931 @Newsweek @TwitterSupport And here’s a Cochran review published in late 2020: https://t.co/pd6TpD1IuN
@ArminPh Bin mir übrigens nicht so sicher, ob ich das mit dem "widerlegt" so eindeutig sehen würde. Die hier können es jedenfalls nicht: https://t.co/15SHzRBL92
@JamesMelville There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask. https://t.co/xQfVciVDgP
https://t.co/GMFFaT36wG Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 studies; 3507 people); and probably makes no difference in how many people have flu confirmed by a labor
RT @brianhopkinsmd: @FatEmperor 3) Nice Cochran review, generally a trustworthy source of reliable study compilation find no evidence for r…
@fffeeerrr68 Spoiler: masks make no difference. https://t.co/oACaU1Cxvv
"Do physical measures such as hand-washing or wearing masks stop or slow down the spread of respiratory viruses? This is an update of a review first published in 2007. We included evidence published up to 1 April 2020 We identified 67 relevant studies."
@rustledjimm Tom Jefferson et al "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" https://t.co/HER10p5jrf
RT @brianhopkinsmd: @FatEmperor 3) Nice Cochran review, generally a trustworthy source of reliable study compilation find no evidence for r…
RT @newulm55: @Woodgirl1977 @SWM_in_SEA @GovInslee Here is a meta analysis of every peer reviewed RCT, they don’t work. https://t.co/uUKi…
@FatEmperor 3) Nice Cochran review, generally a trustworthy source of reliable study compilation find no evidence for routine community masking for respiratory virus pandemics. https://t.co/syNM62CyO5
@JohnGal72674903 @DanoHrtus Tady je review Cochrane s dost opačným závěrem https://t.co/gQl3rdHHm6
@bbqbaseball62 @FatEmperor “Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness” https://t.co/JmJddzQRK9
@JustinWelby Evidence does NOT show masks attenuate transmission of respiratory viruses (https://t.co/ee1NrQM6OQ); nor is asymptomatic transmission a public health hazard (https://t.co/g53x7YQLvH). Following the truth is loving your neighbour. No 'New Norm
@Woodgirl1977 @SWM_in_SEA @GovInslee Here is a meta analysis of every peer reviewed RCT, they don’t work. https://t.co/uUKiQQavQd
@mehdirhasan Maybe $100 trillion... Mickey Mouse is the author of the "study". Meantime, in real world: https://t.co/aj4qDgDir1
@lmosnow @rdmerkley81 @GovInslee I need to start a website of all the references, all cdc and Medicare journals Or just see CA, most restrictions, not working. Masks - https://t.co/uUKiQQavQd The WHO plan is still correct- https://t.co/EY0EhZQXhz
@tocumenaero There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask. https://t.co/xQfVciVDgP
@trishgreenhalgh No! Evidence doesn't suggest masks make a difference to resp virus transmission rates (https://t.co/ee1NrQM6OQ) and the findings of this meta analysis seriously undermine a key assumption of article you cite (https://t.co/fzPOQT9NSS)
@SeriousnessMr @johnthefocuser @TennantRuth The Danmask study is the only of its kind. Previous RCTs of mask use have found no evidence for their effectiveness https://t.co/V3bIcWkHHo
@trishgreenhalgh You've actually inverted the precautionary principle: don't mandate something unless there's strong evidence it will do more good than harm. Evidence does not indicate such is the case with facemasks https://t.co/ee1NrQM6OQ
The pooled results of randomised trials did not show a clear reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks during seasonal influenza. https://t.co/QIoZZlSIRd
Siccome all'OMS non ci crede più nessuno, sulla rivista Cochraine è stato pubblicato un altro meta-studio analogo rifatto da una ventina di medici: https://t.co/aj4qDgDir1 Solo il "lavaggio mani" ha una certa efficacia (16%) anche qui efficacia mascherine
@cjsnowdon @gareth_morrow @GrahamGBR @FatEmperor @Salford17 @nickdalton1972 But these guys do. Look them up, they’re quite authoritative. OK they’re the singular global gold standard for assessing clinical research https://t.co/A52r2rfQZd
Non pharmacological measures have not corresponded with reduction in morbidity or mortality on the dozens of graphs/charts we've examined. Cochrane review states (again) that masks are not effective. Do you have data to the contrary? https://t.co/nOhZU9qs
@drjanaway There's little reason to wear a mask. Not only is asymptomatic transmission very rare (https://t.co/g53x7YQLvH), evidence doesn't seem to suggest masks attenuate spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/ee1NrQM6OQ
@DanielSchoel @GovRonDeSantis @Publix Because it isn't solid research. The highest quality research shows that masks make no difference for respiratory viruses (https://t.co/txM9Ne0I0Z) Why should I favor lower quality mechanistic or correlational analyse
@TaviDuprix @thecovidmonitor https://t.co/48OGcTQepF. "There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.66 to
@latimes science shows if masks help at all, they help very little in reducing community spread. one study of many... https://t.co/DpBoi22DAt
@bobmindedness @Surgeon_General Yeah except that's not true. Here's what the most recent review of mask studies concluded https://t.co/VPUtM7vTyX https://t.co/FJHtr11Q4o
@AwareFlange @Siobhanshouldnt @lightworkertype @theblogmire @ClarkeMicah @DPJHodges More studies showing masks are useless: https://t.co/wBGee6LnAS
@gavinjones10 @miagmarsuren @Reuters > siccome del WHO non si fida più nessuno, Cochraine ha rifatto praticamente lo stesso studio e appunto l'unica cosa che funziona è lavarsi le mani: https://t.co/aj4qDgDir1 e beh, ok, stare a casa se si ha la febbre
12/ This Meta-Analysis from November 2020 summarizes the mask data pretty well. Looking at 67 Clinical Trials from the pre-Covid era, they conclude the following: “There is uncertainty about the effects of face masks.” That about sums it up. https://t.c
@perfe41 > 1)analisi di tutta la letteratura scientifica fatta da OMS/WHO nel 2019 prima della politicizzazione del virus https://t.co/iGst73VN5A 2)analisi di tutta la lett scientifica RIFATTA dalla rivista scientif Cochraine (x chi non si fida più dell
@AdrianneMerk @TheRealKuixote @statomattic Not sure which study you are referring to, or why anyone would want to be ‘disingenuous’ about this. Micro-droplets cannot be ‘smaller than the virus’ -it’s about 60 nm diameter, so a bit lost on your point there
RT @phillipsdo: @statomattic @RMConservative Also have to ignore this: https://t.co/bVYTEEGrHI
RT @phillipsdo: @statomattic @RMConservative Also have to ignore this: https://t.co/bVYTEEGrHI
@JaviSerrano86 @FLMIRONES Pues acabo de revisar la librería Cochrane y tiene toda la pinta que esos 171 estudios deben ser bastante pobres https://t.co/3poB88lRoZ
@vitormori https://t.co/HOtvfq9L9p A Cochrane é a maior biblioteca de revisões sistemáticas do mundo. Muitos estudos avaliados e sérios com respostas mais técnicas acerca da profilaxia e outros.
@ianbetteridge @EndUKLockdown1 Look at the evidence: it does not demonstrate that masks are indicated as there's no evidence they're efficacious in attenuating respiratory virus spread https://t.co/ee1NrQM6OQ and there's no evidence asymptomatic transmissi
@statomattic @RMConservative Also have to ignore this: https://t.co/bVYTEEGrHI
@BigOrangePruitt @larry_griebenow @rayandherdog @NahasNewman @mamasaurusMeg You've linked mechanistic studies done in labs, and politicians recommending them. That's not the same as community masking "Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make
L'importance de l'hygiène des mains est probablement sous-estimée, même dans la Covid-19 >> https://t.co/C7DGvJHYpV
@TeeHool1 @GisseProf Ja tässä maskeista kooste. Tähän ei ole vielä päivitetty Tanskan tutkimusta. Lisää tutkimuksia on myös tulossa, joten asia tarkentuu vielä. https://t.co/9ppe1Vg5Tn
@victimclture @goddersbloom Meta analysis of studies has also shown that there is no significant difference between wearing a mask and not, in terms of transmission rates. https://t.co/ZcJELKeKfv https://t.co/3SUtjnnoPU
@notBlackKeys She literally was sleeping, Jake. 🤣🤣😂😂😂 Holy fuck, my dude. All of this is predicated on asymptomatic spread which has <1% prevalence in living settings, so it's kind of a silly argument unless people are symptomatic, but... https://t.co
@JoeBiden science does not support your request https://t.co/DpBoi22DAt
@JoeBiden Slimy creep. And, BTW, the evidence does not suggest masks attenuate spread of respiratory viruses - https://t.co/ee1NrQM6OQ
RT @tadpoet: @jamesacorrea @ianmSC They've never worked & never will outside sterile settings and only for bodily fluids. We dont need 60+…
@jamesacorrea @ianmSC They've never worked & never will outside sterile settings and only for bodily fluids. We dont need 60+ rct studies to prove it, we can use our brains https://t.co/VIRjqDOETp
@timtron2020 @RustyMark4 @ragnorakishere @MichaelRosenYes @markoftheD @ValiMD Just been looking and only thing I found was this https://t.co/qadC7ZeZZQ This was about masks https://t.co/rRUzRS4hrz Then we have other studies that find other results li
@heatiswork @SingleWithKids @robbiecec @VictimOfMaths Here is one review from Oxford, another from US. https://t.co/cSVZU0UcAM https://t.co/xaZlfpeQko
@pmobbs @philmcC9 @bbc5live @hugh_montgomery @rachelburden @BBCSounds I know a Cochrane review isn't quite as good as your source relying on an anecdote of two hairdressers, but it's worth noting https://t.co/VPUtM7vTyX https://t.co/ZaH1XpuJZm
@ShivversLaw @Jason_de_Savary No good evidence they serve their intended purpose in this environment (https://t.co/hHDxls5sKD) or in the community as a means of mitigating resp virus spread (https://t.co/ee1NrQM6OQ)
RT @TrackingCovid: https://t.co/PLggISwtuQ "wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illness (…
https://t.co/PLggISwtuQ "wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illness (9 studies; 3507 people); and probably makes no difference in how many people have flu confirmed by a laboratory test"
Det verkar som om Tegnell & Co inte har haft fel vad gäller masker, åtminstone enligt en stor metastudie utförd av den ansedda Cochrane-gruppen. https://t.co/yqEdTCr7Fb https://t.co/5fRhOmYSZP
Tänk ... Tänk om Tegnell och FOHM vet mer om smittsamma sjukdomar än självaste Peter Wolodarski.
Intressant och möjligen lite nedslående forskningsgenomgång från ansedda Cochrane om vad som biter på spridningen av luftvägsinfektioner. https://t.co/zDjCDzT9wp
RT @massivechange1: @PergamIC @trishgreenhalgh What do you think of the Cochrane review of mask wearing? https://t.co/6Yept870E2 "We are un…
@PergamIC @trishgreenhalgh What do you think of the Cochrane review of mask wearing? https://t.co/6Yept870E2 "We are uncertain whether wearing masks or N95/P2 respirators helps to slow the spread of respiratory viruses. "
@SaltaoVladimir @BWCHBoss Thee is no evidence that masks work, and now multiple publications showing asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare
RT @tuffy_sir: @creon @annmarcos1 And a very recent Cochrane review reached the same conclusions https://t.co/0wHkELedUr
RT @anarkristo: "Los resultados no mostraron reducción clara de infección viral respiratoria con uso de máscaras quirúrgicas. No hubo dif…