@MrsSarahMurray @MichaelYeadon3 @indymeansindy @ClareCraigPath @RoodGridance Regarding masks, Cochrane is the guiding source for medicine normally. https://t.co/VmxlDpKT4i

@Kyle_Beasley08 @inperspective0 @LisaMarieBoothe https://t.co/gQPkrQpwvi

@BitTradr @yinonw It is also what the side advocating the draconian measures is doing! Betcha didn’t see this in headlines in late November: https://t.co/bVYTEEGrHI

@realdjdiverse @michaelmalice While we’re at it, here’s a Conchrane compilation of 67 studies that tell you everything you need to know https://t.co/axQx8m7fmv

@janlotvall @Sven_Roman Hur tolkar du och hur värderar du Cochrane-rapporten Jan? En vänlig undran för buden är många. https://t.co/VmxlDpKT4i

@maldita_ciencia Revisión Cochrane https://t.co/sKGOpuhqiO https://t.co/6LDEIwuFmw

@f_hieronymus @KennethBodin Handtvätt finns det RCT på sen tidigare. Inte SARS-CoV-2 då men andra luftvägsvirus https://t.co/Qcf31uo4yc Två meter är ju bara en no brainer. Sen kan man ju diskutera om det är bättre med 2,5 eller 5m. Eller om det räcker med

RT @JJPeregrine: @RalphNader Fact check: "Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many peopl…

RT @DrEliDavid: מצד אחד, עוד ועוד מאמרים מצביעים על חוסר האפקטיביות של מסכות (אין אפילו מאמר RCT אחד שתומך במסכות!). ומצד השני, משרד הבריא…

@864511320Bot @F_Giannantonio @ryrob97 @jak55555 @realDonaldTrump Do you like these sources better? Need more? https://t.co/6Pv33f49Ry https://t.co/QeahO2DPk9 https://t.co/t0iPErGakS https://t.co/FgW4urWpNC

@TheOracle201823 @workaverse69 @JimmysSeafood https://t.co/NjPRkX7EUp https://t.co/T4AlGl2KmY

@Robert76907841 @RememberDDorn @gwendobee @GovInslee Here is an analysis of 67 RCTs on mask use, not effective. I challenge you to produce a single RCT, not a lab study. https://t.co/uUKiQQavQd

RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…

@theladychuck See further down thread. https://t.co/X2AMF4aQ1e

RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…

RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…

RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…

@Volksverpetzer Cherry Picking, die Saisonalität hat sehr viel Einfluss, daher ist diese Studie vom gemessenen Zeitraum nicht zu gebrauchen! ⬇️Key messages: We are uncertain whether wearing masks or N95/P2 respirators helps to slow the spread of respirator

Pertaining to this https://t.co/zTXGpjMRYF For some interventions large RCTs are tough to do and thus may not represent the best available evidence for a given question. Similar issues are seen when looking at the health effects of smoking.

@KempoThe @larry_griebenow @Hi5HANK @JordanSchachtel https://t.co/DDtlGOIXf4 https://t.co/y7ExixcrLo

@UPNIGHT When you combine the lack of evidence from studies with real world data showing masks have been completely ineffective, it is clear and convincing evidence that they don’t work https://t.co/icRdtrABzk

@DanielPrantner @boriquagato @JohnathonPriest @ianmSC "There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask. Harms were rarely measur

@einselection @MarkChangizi https://t.co/IGOcx6MST9 But you jumped into a thread about a demand for a national US mask that magically protects against “droplets [easy] AND aerosols; that is comfortable, reusable, ....” That is a fantasyland list of unphy

Masks are religious symbols:

@presidenciapma Stop the mask terror There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.26; 6 trials; 30

@DiMartinoBooth there are no good studies to show masks actually reduce community spread in the real world (vs in the lab). Personally, I think they are a good idea, but they are not the key. Distancing and hand hygiene are the key. https://t.co/DpBoi22DA

@suffinizer @JoeMacintyre1 Shane, they don’t work and they’re bringing out a very nasty side in a lot of people. I’m all for people wearing masks if it makes them feel safer but not mandatory masks without the evidence to back them up https://t.co/0wHkELed

@KamalaHarris science; by blocking large particles from cough, sneeze or loud slobbery talking, masks should help. But there are no good studies to prove they help stop the virus in the real world. https://t.co/DpBoi22DAt

@1_Peter315_ and there are no good studies to show masks help with community virus spread in the real world setting ( vs in the lab). https://t.co/DpBoi2kes1

Masks don't work. Masks are dangerous. https://t.co/YchXyiCeFG https://t.co/tdxMpJUCF0 https://t.co/RiO5ZyGuvn https://t.co/OGuiEhbMdk https://t.co/srqkeRiOfQ https://t.co/NupWfs5Iwi https://t.co/cwtkNuy86K

@tickerguy @thedavehall @CDCgov Cochrane review... which you cited... is actually the one who says you have to do all those things. Here is the article that you yourself are talking about: https://t.co/FuNKnUdkuW

@tickerguy @CDCgov I agree... stop lying. Cochrane review said to prevent the spread of respiratory viruses it is important to wash your hands, not touch your eyes and mouth, and WEAR MASKS. Don't know where you got that other idea from... https://t.co/FuN

"There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask" From the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Nov. 2020

@animalpenpals @BenWallace_1 @MaizyDaizyZzzz @BorisJohnson New Cochrane Review meta-analysis published 20 November looked at all the research on face masks, determining there was "uncertainty about the effects" and that we should wash our hands https://t.c

@freyhk @KariTikkinen @myllarni Olen itselleni antanut ymmärtää, mikä ei tietenkään ole koko totuus, että Cochrane-katsaukset edustaisivat tässä asiassa parhainta mahdollista näkemystä. Ja lopputulema on maskien suhteen yhtä synkkä. https://t.co/z3d1oQLfg

@stevieanntas @20gdawg @BigManPauly @RexChapman Studies prove masks don't work https://t.co/5cPZs0V06Q

@hopeful_hoosier @smartmuffin @CDCgov Here's another, no evidence they work: https://t.co/CZUuYZhUno

@cjc563 @KyleKashuv https://t.co/DpBoi22DAt

@ConnorSays4 @KyleKashuv https://t.co/DpBoi22DAt

RT @Nosebend: @Paratus2014 I believe there are 64 published studies all saying masks do not halt viruses here: - https://t.co/k3JYW2jye6

@meredithmusing Not the science I've seen: https://t.co/fWG9pYjMoS

RT @ifihadastick: @ConceptualDoc Systematic review of 67 relevant studies show conflicting results with this. "Compared with wearing no ma…

@catturd2 P.S., Klobuchar is a moron: https://t.co/BouxE95dTp

RT @ifihadastick: @ConceptualDoc Systematic review of 67 relevant studies show conflicting results with this. "Compared with wearing no ma…

RT @ifihadastick: @ConceptualDoc Systematic review of 67 relevant studies show conflicting results with this. "Compared with wearing no ma…

👇

RT @Nosebend: @Paratus2014 I believe there are 64 published studies all saying masks do not halt viruses here: - https://t.co/k3JYW2jye6

RT @ifihadastick: @ConceptualDoc Systematic review of 67 relevant studies show conflicting results with this. "Compared with wearing no ma…

RT @Nosebend: @Paratus2014 I believe there are 64 published studies all saying masks do not halt viruses here: - https://t.co/k3JYW2jye6

RT @Nosebend: @Paratus2014 I believe there are 64 published studies all saying masks do not halt viruses here: - https://t.co/k3JYW2jye6

@Paratus2014 I believe there are 64 published studies all saying masks do not halt viruses here: - https://t.co/k3JYW2jye6

@ConceptualDoc Systematic review of 67 relevant studies show conflicting results with this. "Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference" https://t.co/fWG9pYjMoS

@DiamondandSilk https://t.co/DpBoi22DAt

@NHSMillion Their being forced to wear masks is not based on sound scientific evidence - https://t.co/BFNFqotJrk

@CNN that's Not what the science says https://t.co/DpBoi22DAt

@CNN that's NOT what the science says. they help a little, not a lot. https://t.co/DpBoi22DAt

@juanitafranden Systematisk översikt från Cochrane visar på viss effekt av god handhygien för bekämpande av luftvägsvirus i allmänhet. Har inte sett ngt specifikt för COVID-19. https://t.co/t8ZhSHvikg

@DSmokter @_data_engineer @JamesTodaroMD How about the actual science https://t.co/h9FfxWHDjX

@VARulle Das entzieht sich auch meinem Verständnis, danke für die Antwort. Ich finde das Ergebnis dennoch irritierend (v.a das Ausmaß und die Überzeugung), wenn ich diese Meta-Analyse lese: https://t.co/q0tDiyRWIS

Little difference ? https://t.co/TXMQcS2fH1

@Brian_in_Dorset @alienep @ukcloudpro @GeorgeMonbiot @ClarkeMicah https://t.co/JCQEhECmOv

@acarts13 @AlexBerenson I agree, and tired of mask discussions. Anyway, to your point, missing the WHO one but: https://t.co/xa6npjEJ9K https://t.co/Qj6r5uTe20 https://t.co/z5TIv1rw8H

RT @spasskultur: https://t.co/UfkoNYoWle https://t.co/0ySlAOgrYF

RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…

@joemama30408066 @theleaguewinner @kevcol12 @StevePayaslian @thehill I’m lost. That’s an article posted on Hartford Healthcare’s website, primarily used to find healthcare providers in Connecticut? And all these studies are peer reviewed? Did you even clic

@_data_engineer @chopper_time69 @BamaCrazy1 @JamesTodaroMD https://t.co/h9FfxWHDjX

@Brian_in_Dorset @alienep @ukcloudpro @GeorgeMonbiot @ClarkeMicah There really isn't. https://t.co/ee1NrQM6OQ

@raffeman Nuvarande evidens på effekten av att be folk bära mask är dålig. https://t.co/Tm6b6knvZ2 Allt som finns utöver det där är sämre ekologiska studier och studiet som på labb visar att det begränsar smittan Inget i min tweet går på något vis emot d

Science says masks don't work...politics (disguised as "Science") says masks will stop a respiratory virus from spreading during cold/flu season. Hmmmm. @GovernorGordon @WYLegislature @CSTribune @WTEnews @WYPublicRadio

RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…

https://t.co/UfkoNYoWle https://t.co/0ySlAOgrYF

@lieberothdk Observationsstudier anses for at have lav validitet (sammenlignet med randomiserede studier) fordi der, som du siger, kan være 117 andre faktorer som spiller ind https://t.co/BpOBdnLYGM

@CNN masks help. but they DO NOT STOP the spread. https://t.co/DpBoi22DAt

@Urankraft https://t.co/Tm6b6knvZ2

@joemama30408066 @theleaguewinner @kevcol12 @StevePayaslian @thehill And then logic semantics aside, masks themselves don’t have much of an effect, if at all, on preventing COVID. You’re welcome to do research on both sides. I just hope you have the same a

@DrunkenWalk @gbdeclaration @jeffreyatucker There is only one randomized controlled trial RE masks in covid, DANMASK, showed no benefit. Plenty of non covid study... Why? Because they showed no benefit and keep trying... 2 examples: https://t.co/NhaRt3VkF

@HannaMOllila @liisatlaine @jukka_koskela @MarkkuPeltonen @JesperKivela @AleksiReito @cochranecollab Talking of the Cochrane review by Tom Jefferson et al.: https://t.co/G4bbR8AQ6k there is no requirement in Prospero to avoid overlap with existing reviews

@den1skildavaran @hawk_swede @surfbruden @Expressen Normal anser dessa herrar att Cochrane-rapporter har ett extremt högt bevisvärde men inte när det gäller munskydd uppenbarligen. 🤔https://t.co/VmxlDpKT4i

RT @Tammy_Hoffmann: Update of Cochrane review now available: Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruse…

@rmara76 @EWoodhouse7 @BGRMHayFam4 @GovMikeDeWine Easy. Next. https://t.co/VoTcfF6eWE

@CNN https://t.co/P6wAF1UlMY

@DailyCaller Masks do not stop respiratory viruses. Yes, they help with particulates and may help a little with large particle carrier spread. Physical distancing and hand hygiene is the key. Stop selling mask wearing as the key. https://t.co/DpBoi22DAt

@hi2_lo @MikaelNiku @KriittinenS Näitä on vaikka kuinka ja paljon. Tuosta alkua. Tähön ei ole vielä päivitetty tanskalaistutkimusta, https://t.co/9ppe1Vg5Tn

https://t.co/9ppe1Vg5Tn

RT @mikolaj_kam: <to o mnie> (chociaż nie przeszlismy na Ty). Te "brednie" to ochrona własnego zdania i wrzucanie następujących linków: htt…

<to o mnie> (chociaż nie przeszlismy na Ty). Te "brednie" to ochrona własnego zdania i wrzucanie następujących linków: https://t.co/wM8KZewOPs , https://t.co/VAEY2kf6Dp, i https://t.co/UcGIrKxIcl z komentarzem. To tak apropos Fundacji powołującej si

RT @mikolaj_kam: @KrzysztofLanda @covid19_cz @FundacjaWHC @a_niedzielski @MZ_GOV_PL @PremierRP @MorawieckiM @jciesz @Jaroslaw_Gowin @Jakub_…

@TomimPAAN @merja_rantala @HarriKamala @freyhk @Yrtithepreaa @eroonkoronasta Onko toi parempi: (Otskko on Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses) https://t.co/0NJQVxafuy

@TomimPAAN @merja_rantala @HarriKamala @freyhk @Yrtithepreaa @eroonkoronasta Cochrane kertoo menetelmät todella tarkkaan. https://t.co/5BMG7cc2bt

@covid19_cz @KrzysztofLanda @FundacjaWHC @a_niedzielski @MZ_GOV_PL @PremierRP @MorawieckiM @jciesz @Jaroslaw_Gowin @Jakub_Banaszek @SzumowskiLukasz A tu pełna meta-analiza Cochrane https://t.co/KnzRtcz39b

@KrzysztofLanda @covid19_cz @FundacjaWHC @a_niedzielski @MZ_GOV_PL @PremierRP @MorawieckiM @jciesz @Jaroslaw_Gowin @Jakub_Banaszek A doświadczenia z grypą i z maskami też mamy: https://t.co/VAEY2kf6Dp . Dlatego właśnie @SzumowskiLukasz w lutym śmiał się z

@EJonhagen @Sven_Roman Enligt Cochrane-analys är evidensen för munskydd i befolking svaga medan handtvätt och fysiskt avstånd minskar risken för smitta. Om det finns en risk att munskydd kan ha negativ effekt på det som vi vet fungerar, skall man använda d

@covid19_cz @KrzysztofLanda @FundacjaWHC @a_niedzielski @MZ_GOV_PL @PremierRP @MorawieckiM @jciesz @Jaroslaw_Gowin @Jakub_Banaszek Nie, to oznacza, że powinny być zaleceniem a nie przymusem. RCT z COVID19 mamy - DANMASK19 https://t.co/wM8KZewOPs, drugie w

@Lugverbotszone @gaborhalasz1 @MisterErrorr Oftmals wird nur Cherry Picking bei den Maskenstudien betrieben, ein Zusammenfassung vieler Studien: https://t.co/tpXBTred1r Die größte angelegte Studie gab es in Dänemark: https://t.co/2HuT65zuu6 Die Ergebnisse

RT @MarkChangizi: 🔥 New review of RCTs on masks 🎭 Masks “make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu‐like illness (9 stu…

@BrettHampton16 @PressSec @CNN @andersoncooper https://t.co/KIN7FBnCqo

@havilandmike @PressSec @CNN @andersoncooper https://t.co/KIN7FBnCqo

@jaxblast @PressSec @CNN @andersoncooper https://t.co/KIN7FBnCqo

@rosemarymongell @PressSec @CNN @andersoncooper https://t.co/KIN7FBnCqo

@BoydLRogers @PressSec @CNN @andersoncooper https://t.co/KIN7FBnCqo