@CorporatismF @cosmoconure @FrankConniff That was in vitro. In trials it fails when the data under proper medical analysis https://t.co/a5bL51B5w5
RT @toofewcacti: @RealAmVoice A year ago, ivermectin's effectiveness vs Covid was unknown. You could make a case for taking it. A few smal…
RT @CochraneLibrary: JUST PUBLISHED - #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 https://t.co/FR6Lc5HB7J New @Cochrane_IDG looked at…
@Ride64J @ShinMadero @BretWeinstein Re: "take it up with the WHO." Oh, how cute; the troll account is pretending the WHO agrees with it. 🤣 https://t.co/S2yZNi3F6r https://t.co/BlaXLUVp3l https://t.co/JIRZH2d9iW https://t.co/msl2Hh0km1
@RealAmVoice A year ago, ivermectin's effectiveness vs Covid was unknown. You could make a case for taking it. A few small, short-duration studies of its effect were promising. Now, many studies have been done & shown no evidence that ivermectin help
@Procue @emmythelab @drdavidsamadi From the same page you quoted https://t.co/9qFfc75CKp
@bluewizardofs @Jeebo64 @GerardoDAmico Forse è il caso che leggi, il tuo "studio" arriva da ivmmeta, che ha solo un piccolissimo difetto (vedi foto). Chi fa revisione sistematica dice altro (vedi paper linkato) E per favore prima di rispondere, leggi.
@bluewizardofs @Jeebo64 @GerardoDAmico Mi dai il link allo studio? IVM META immagino https://t.co/SPjDa6nPyD e' il caso che rivedi le tue fonti....qui siamo a livello di Novella 2000 Perchè Cochrane dice tutt'altro https://t.co/pXvPxeSzoJ https://t.co
@BrBrbaseball @AltPOTUS1776 @DonaldJTrumpJr Consider serious reviews of research, ivermectin and chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) https://t.co/VP5adVqjF2 and https://t.co/lPefDRZ5a3
@barbarab1974 Forse perché non serve a niente? https://t.co/3Lld49aM8S
And the studies/results are conflicting, like almost every single thing involving this virus🤪😭 Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed https://t.co/Q4utcYvSEg
@DrDisagio @AStramezzi @fracchio_2 @2Rognoso @nessuno39328107 @preglias Io non ho nemmeno capito se l'ivermecrina è utilizzata in queste cure domiciliari. E, nel caso, sulla base di quale studio conclusivo. Visto che non ce ne sono. Gli atti di questo cong
@carlosmvv09 @ElGallinazo Literatura científica, como debe ser https://t.co/C4TZjgQAAG
@frank58132602 @angel_willlow @JRosengard @RealCandaceO @joerogan "It’s proven that it works, if you can’t see it that’s on you." You've yet to link me to a single study suggesting as much. Did you forget, already? Want another? https://t.co/uQD6ovWO9y
RT @GabinJean3: 5/n La méta-analyse de Popp et son équipe est publiée par Cochrane: " Sa conclusion: "Sur la base des preuves actuelles de…
@PrLantern @arikouts Pour l'IVM, un peu daté, car depuis les deux études les plus positives ont été rétractées... Ce qui fait énormément chuter les chances que ça puisse fonctionner https://t.co/REsJ6BcxoH
Q: Has any generic/orphan/'non profit'/off patent drug ever entered the pay-for-play FDA 'Golden Standard Trials' that so many are waiting/demanding for? Asking for a friend... #Ivermectin #IvermectinWarriors
#Ivermectin This is the document you can use to answer the following: “But there’s no evidence that IVM works.” “There are no randomized controlled trials of IVM.” “The withdrawn study nullifies the conclusions of the meta-analyses of IVM.” https://t.co
@NYFinest27 @JamesFourM That we will actually look at the site of the link they provided and be astonished to read that ivermectin studies aren’t conclusive in being good for treatment and have no evidence to support their use as a prophylactic? https://
@Oysterhaven @socialistboomer @KimIversenShow Analysis of ivermectin studies: https://t.co/oujzxjQtGS
@OHTRTA Funny how often you people turn to conspiracy mongering instead of acting like adults and facing the actual hard data. https://t.co/yqqJ7JtJyd
@AnnieMa80768160 Ivermectin again? Oh sure... https://t.co/NCqwmfQd6E https://t.co/d9BtkwK54f https://t.co/L0aR1yUkLJ
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 https://t.co/Y3gOiUGSQH
@Lugverbotszone @jensspahn Die Studien zu Ivermectin wurden durchaus von der Uni Würzburg untersucht. Ergebnis: "Die aktuelle Evidenz rechtfertigt keine Verwendung von Ivermectin zur Behandlung oder Prävention von Covid-19" https://t.co/K4UBGwEUhx https:
And in a 5 min Google search, I found that the NIH cannot determine if it’s effective or not… but they’ve considered it! https://t.co/rm9W8wi27Z
@SwitchHerve @IcelandRaphael @lonnibesancon @CStrateges @Verhaeghe Il y a actuellement 31 études en cours => https://t.co/Uk1bdzYZSb
@TrumanHenry51 @joerogan You’ve read this info, right? Overwhelming: https://t.co/w5mhBVFswj https://t.co/X03dPRoEan https://t.co/Xd3mDmddwa
@joan_sellares @Dr_Pilgrim @CT150113 @a_linzoain @Nopanaden Es curioso que los que recelan de vacunas con estudios sólidos en cientos de miles de voluntarios, y más de 6000 millones de dosis corroborando su efectividad y seguridad, promuevan el uso de un a
@tradrmum https://t.co/WYrYJRFC4f Conclusion is "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." Plenty of morons are taking it and dying. T
RT @JVfor8b: Covid isn't worms. You'd think a doctor would know that. "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use…
So far, Ivermectin looks like BS to me... Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/1nTEbBMWmU
@hopeful_hoosier @justthefacts24 @FOX59 That's from February. What does Merck make more $ on, Ivermectin or novel therapeutics. They need to study it because the efficacy isnt conclusive yet. You arent for cheaper therapeutics from repurposed drugs that's
@Zandebar @sarapepperbox @PantherJohnson @sandi_borger @samiamsamh @laurenboebert And reality does not support their optimism when reviewed in detail. https://t.co/5ZVokquPUY What I'm getting from this conversation is that you have no interest in evidence
@Skulldaddy81 @nytimes Here is a more recent study https://t.co/jBOTb294p8
@CBDS0 @PopulistAmy @ReutersScience Let's just go ahead and use a more recent version of the site you're referring to. https://t.co/wFb0Help2j
RT @CochraneLibrary: @TheSGEM @oshodhayansats1 @michaelsharma @GidMK @cochranecollab #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 📚 #O…
Q: Has any generic/orphan/'non profit'/off patent drug ever entered the pay-for-play FDA 'Golden Standard Trials' that so many are waiting/demanding for? Asking for a friend...
@solifericat @NyadolNyuon The latest systematic review of the results does not agree with you: https://t.co/bDflTDcesP Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐d
Covid isn't worms. You'd think a doctor would know that. "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." https://t.co/7pAzYvXGj0
@TXFLSE @patiodweller @DerekAn47185697 https://t.co/OIzAHv4lvs Same source saying there is NO clinical evidence that Ivermectin works.
@Noneed2cry33 @hospital_porter @Karl_Lauterbach Hm, vielleicht wäre Lesen für dich das Richtige. Ich hab es jedenfalls getan. Kleines Beispiel? https://t.co/Lp8gpQ9oJN Ich befürchte allerdings das du auf Dr. Schiffmann-Niveau agierst und damit für dich Wis
@oshodhayansats1 @michaelsharma @TheSGEM @CochraneLibrary @GidMK @CaulfieldTim @KirstyChallen @PierreKory Yes, we received a 10 month technology grant 5 years ago in 2016, with a specific focus on maternal and child health. #Ivermectin for preventing and
RT @CochraneLibrary: @TheSGEM @oshodhayansats1 @michaelsharma @GidMK @cochranecollab #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 📚 #O…
RT @CochraneLibrary: @TheSGEM @oshodhayansats1 @michaelsharma @GidMK @cochranecollab #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 📚 #O…
RT @CochraneLibrary: @TheSGEM @oshodhayansats1 @michaelsharma @GidMK @cochranecollab #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 📚 #O…
RT @CochraneLibrary: @TheSGEM @oshodhayansats1 @michaelsharma @GidMK @cochranecollab #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 📚 #O…
RT @CochraneLibrary: @TheSGEM @oshodhayansats1 @michaelsharma @GidMK @cochranecollab #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 📚 #O…
RT @CochraneLibrary: @TheSGEM @oshodhayansats1 @michaelsharma @GidMK @cochranecollab #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 📚 #O…
RT @CochraneLibrary: @TheSGEM @oshodhayansats1 @michaelsharma @GidMK @cochranecollab #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 📚 #O…
@TinaSchesso @petron @RepMaryFranson Look at their actual vaccination rate, not what Abeyance right wing media is falsely reporting. Ivermectin has NOT been shown effective. Facts matter. https://t.co/7pAzYvXGj0
RT @CochraneLibrary: @TheSGEM @oshodhayansats1 @michaelsharma @GidMK @cochranecollab #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 📚 #O…
RT @CochraneLibrary: @TheSGEM @oshodhayansats1 @michaelsharma @GidMK @cochranecollab #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 📚 #O…
@TheSGEM @oshodhayansats1 @michaelsharma @GidMK @cochranecollab #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 📚 #OpenAccess Systematic Review: https://t.co/FR6Lc5HB7J 🤓 #PlainLanguage Summary & Podcast: https://t.co/gScsCdulsD 🗣️Commentary from au
@Sam49625050 @Paul_Baro @ColinY43 @RachelgraceT @mattwridley Kinda just confirms the article I posted. And this one: https://t.co/wcWVkA4xwP If you read the studies you posted they were small and had statistically low poor outcomes for both ivermectin and
@goodgolly247 @inthenameofsaf1 @GeriMonsen1 @KrudeThoughts @FredLI @KBAndersen @karenvaites @DrEricDing @ASlavitt This is another gold standard paper on IVR research . https://t.co/nvqwOSAByp
@drdoolittles I suggest you read this from the @cochranecollab. Far more rigorous methodology when conducting a systematic review. https://t.co/GOwYvQxvi4
@KevinRo12692619 @Covid19Critical Experimental? You mean the one that’s fully fda approved? What about AZ/JJ vaccine that uses repurposed vax technology. Up to 15% have symptoms after 6 months, same with 1/6 in hospital and 1/3 in icu. 1/5 die if over 8
@ChandyJohnLab With all due respect, these meta-analyses are useless. Each of the studies utilized need further examination. The Bryant meta-analysis was already dismantled by the Cochrane library for being low quality. https://t.co/80fdz83PSx https://t.c
1 or 2 studies out of over sixty plus.... mmmmm... ok cool... so you are saying we should let people including breakthroughs and Long Haulers just suffer without trying...mmmm... not so cool #Ivermectin #IvermectinWarriors https://t.co/Pj0dlb6vv8
@btysonmd "Based on current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we're uncertain about efficacy/safety of ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID. Completed studies are small, few are high quality. Several studies are underway that may produce clearer answers
@Thetruthwilllo2 @trutherbleuchef Well he was doing ok until he started talking about ivermectin and hydroxychloroquin. https://t.co/AlTRTf7hbt https://t.co/utZIESZuxB
@heyironmand @Covid19Critical https://t.co/bKkZmf16IX Google “cochrane review ivermectin” if link fails https://t.co/FJJj1MJmL2 https://t.co/6lhklEN6rB
@MeetsLight @Benelef999 Authors' conclusions: Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. https://t.co/0vWbG4DAB7
RT @CochraneJapan: イベルメクチンの効果を見たコクランレビューが出版されました。現段階のエビデンスからは、COVID-19患者の入院・外来治療、およびハイリスク曝露後の感染予防に使用されるイベルメクチンの有効性と安全性については不確実と結論付けられました。…
@Roadwolf73 @fiato_corto @barbarab1974 Ma non vi viene il dubbio che usare come fonte un sito che si chiama https://t.co/BjHzMyyX08 sia quantomeno discutibile? Cochrane è il punto di riferimento globale per le review e indovina un po' https://t.co/TXSvIUhA
5/n La revue Cochrane de Popp, ici https://t.co/spAHbl99su qui ne trouvait pas de bénéfice à l'utilisation de l'ivermectine a été à son tour critiquée par les auteurs d'une méta-analyse favorable à l'ivermectine https://t.co/gwwm1AFVw5 et https://t.co/E1k
@0Cooking @AxjRZsOn3cgUR2z @mydaphne Comment ça? Voilà une étude pour votre ivermectine. Allez à la conclusion 😉 https://t.co/2FTmRoQow9
@regnans @iabfe @socratesccost @ProudOldSoldier I am not sure of his motives for promotion of Ivermectin in COVID but his claims are certainly not supported by careful reviews if the evidence https://t.co/5Eqgsx1B2j
@madness1407 @AboudNadjia @sympacegarcon @bellissent @passionsdelisah l'ivermectine ne fonctionne pas malgré la propagande réinfocovid, médicos por la verdad, America's Frontline Doctors... Ils be basent sur des études même rétractées... Un peu de lecture
9/n Les revues ne peuvent pas conclure à une efficacité de l'ivermectine et notent la mauvaise qualité des études https://t.co/spAHbl99su https://t.co/YQIKZ2mBE1
@ShayneSkills @tasmaniacal1 @CollignonPeter @Fiona_M_Russell 31 proper studies noe being done. Everything to date was sloppy and shows no strong trends. https://t.co/QKr9afrZDm
@CollignonPeter There are 31 proper RCT studies being conducted now. Nothing to date has been properly structured to enable valid analysis, and what has been done gives no evidence that it improves, makes worse or does nothing at all. https://t.co/QKr9afrZ
@HiJinx_77 @ptzimos @K_GwenT @Bondgirl1312 @9NewsMelb Here is a proper, systematic review of Ivermectin. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19” https://t.co/VztBDKIj
@34Camerone @Inoclas3 @Fraslin @La_Pollice Bah malheureusement et jusqu'à preuve du contraire, si... https://t.co/87VmHjT9pK
@alan2102z @DeanCoulson @JohnBoweActor Why are you giving me that again Alan? Lawrie is a crank. Both her & Kory hawk IVM. That you don’t know this speaks volumes about you. Now go away & flag wave for horse wormer to someone else. Use a decen
@GabinJean3 Si, mon interrogation est sincère, et mes compétences scientifiques très limitées, et je ne comprend pas l'absence de consensus sur cette molécule. Pourquoi les uns disent blanc et les autres noir? Pas recommandé: https://t.co/fUtazugyJ9
@oshodhayansats1 @michaelsharma @GidMK Last article cited is an opinion piece which is the lowest form of evidence on the evidence hierarchy pyramid. If higher quality studies (SRMA) have not demonstrated benefit we should have more confidence in them than
@VincentRedon @Texide1 @StephaneTheodo2 @jrseihgstein @vincentglad Ça c'est une bonne meta https://t.co/hzEsl6MoNp
@SadieXShaw @DeanCoulson @JohnBoweActor There has been funding & trials. https://t.co/2SHc2DQH7m Merck are trialling molnupiravir which is an anti viral (not an anti -parasitic) & is nothing like IVM.
@CotswoldsBloke @DeanCoulson @JohnBoweActor This is based upon meta analyses performed by the FLCCC (withdrawn), Andrew Hill (which was based upon Elgazar which has been found fraudulent) & Lawrie (withdrawn). Cochrane is an accurate meta-analysis. h
@anhelki @villecantell Ivermektiinistä on tehty tutkimuksia eikä näistä tutkimuksista tehdyssä koosteessa ole löytynyt minkäänlaista viitettä sen tehosta COVID-19:ään. Linkki ohessa: https://t.co/RKBqOiXnBO Vastaavasti kaipaisin tieteellistä tutkimusartik
@aus_macca @Peter_Fitz See Cochrane Systematic Review, July ‘21 that looked at all available appropriate quality studies for evidence of effectiveness. https://t.co/Qg5jB50jCv
@PuzzledCanary @DeanCoulson @JohnBoweActor You need a proper meta-analysis not one with zero objectivity. IVM does not work. https://t.co/2SHc2Dz6fO