@CikuNjongo @ppbkenya @LeonLidigu @NationAfrica 😂😂😂.. i think i’ve been reading too much! Ahh, Ivermectin. Here is what i dug.. The results of the Cochrane analysis-low to low certinity- hence the position of WHO. Plus the toxicity outweighs the effic
@Amnafq__ @Archangel28_ @aemieruls_ Eropah mana yg cakap tu? Bagi bukti research yg dah dibuat. Jangan cakap saja, tin kosong pun bunyi kuat https://t.co/JSRdzjLpKy
@RAFALOCA1 @GiacomoGorini Diciamo che riferirsi ad un sito che si chiama IVMMETA per avere dati sull'ivermectina non è una buona idea "Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library" https://t.co/TXSvITZZql
@Elbarstardo @lux_schwab Ok, by way of example, here’s a link to a proper, systematic scientific review… TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19” https://t.co/VztBDKIj
@nan4tjn @jds20181 @Queenbathsheba7 @NototyrannyNOW Ivermectin literally causes brain damage when you take it alot. Your source also doesn't include vaccinated people getting myocarditis. Things need to be repeated to see that the study isn't a fluke or
RT @OPalanca: @mariana057 Here is an article from a reliable scientific publication regarding the effectiveness of Ivermectin in preventing…
@someniceplace @GeorgeMonbiot Interesting to see what Cochrane says about the studies carried out thus far, some of which were double blinded (see 'Main results") "No study compared ivermectin to an intervention with proven efficacy" https://t.co/SKH7nKbA
@xPriddyBoi @rp_tbilisi @ArianaD386 @uche_blackstock @NICKIMINAJ So far, peer-reviewed meta-analysis shows Ivermectin to be ineffective for COVID. https://t.co/8INxTxBzDN
@PierreBeverly @IdeTahiti Nope, ils s'en sortent car ils vont à l'hôpital, et se vaccinent. Ils donnent de faux espoir aux gens, c'est pourquoi il fait son mea culpa sans vouloir l'avouer clairement. L'étude la plus complète à ce jour, pas plus efficace qu
@KimDotcom "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials." https://t.co/IVE2LK34BW
Here is a review of findings on Ivermectin so far. https://t.co/9JV9NHwKoJ
RT @PaulinoRobert: Si le interesa leer, Cochrane realizó una revisión sistemática sobre el uso de #Ivermectina : https://t.co/hhbEgWcEUz
@Censoredconser6 @carlos_pepin_sb @thehill A wide range of illnesses doesn't mean all of them. Talking specifically about its usefulness against covid, here's what the NIH says https://t.co/9NS7iBVh8I https://t.co/aE6rRZSHbX
@NBCNews Unbelievable these comments here, wow. He’s speaking truth and willing to stand up against the evil in this world right now. Ivermectin is being suppressed by the media and Big Pharma. Open your eyes. https://t.co/RILEQt8MD4
@medallegheny1 @TheRealHoarse @NBCNews I’m so sorry that you are so deeply fooled by the media that you cannot recognize the truth when it’s staring at you in the face. But keep getting your booster shots forever and making goat jokes. https://t.co/RILEQt
RT @kemptont: That concludes that there is no evidence in any of these studies that Ivermectin prevents,alleviates or treats Covid.
@AJew4Peace @willsommer No, "Fauci's NIH" says no such thing. PubMed is a literature/repository, not an endorsement from the NIH. Ivermectin is being studied, but evidence supporting it is lacking. https://t.co/xrB6ZAWMyV
RT @PaulinoRobert: Si le interesa leer, Cochrane realizó una revisión sistemática sobre el uso de #Ivermectina : https://t.co/hhbEgWcEUz
RT @PaulinoRobert: Si le interesa leer, Cochrane realizó una revisión sistemática sobre el uso de #Ivermectina : https://t.co/hhbEgWcEUz
Si le interesa leer, Cochrane realizó una revisión sistemática sobre el uso de #Ivermectina : https://t.co/hhbEgWcEUz
@POTUS https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Moderate, severe, and critical cases (approximately 20%), with the need for oxygen supplementation, ventilatory support, or intensive medical care, cause a considerable burden for healthcare systems. Defined risk factors read
@POTUS https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Moderate, severe, and critical cases (approximately 20%), with the need for oxygen supplementation, ventilatory support, or intensive medical care, cause a considerable burden for healthcare systems. Defined risk factors read
@JoeBiden https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Moderate, severe, and critical cases (approximately 20%), with the need for oxygen supplementation, ventilatory support, or intensive medical care, cause a considerable burden for healthcare systems. Defined risk factors r
@JustinTrudeau https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Moderate, severe, and critical cases (approximately 20%), with the need for oxygen supplementation, ventilatory support, or intensive medical care, cause a considerable burden for healthcare systems. Defined risk fact
@melaniejoly @JustinTrudeau @liberal_party https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Moderate, severe, and critical cases (approximately 20%), with the need for oxygen supplementation, ventilatory support, or intensive medical care, cause a considerable burden for healthcar
@SteveIsDamaged @dambrose_k @Liberalthelorax @lilycatsmeow @GigiGraciette I've read what they wrote and they know nothing. They need better studies. I've been saying this for a year. https://t.co/U5RPXEgf3x
@MediavillaMarga @martinfd78 @el_pais No es aconsejable dosis triple de este antiparasitario. Le remito simplemente a la Cochrane en español incluso que evalúa la eficacia, no comprobada. https://t.co/8QZFxA2eFU
@nan4tjn Bruhhh u didn't even cite a study Here's an actual study that goes over 14 other studies https://t.co/gXuH4B1ImE Also ivermectin causes neurological disorders https://t.co/bGaz41DOgC But you know what? You can go ahead and take ivermectin, y
@BentKees @nrc Deze is overigens niet teruggetrokken: https://t.co/9lUe1Tv8Yv
RT @Lechatbon: @NicoleKowalski5 @DeathMetalV @RonFilipkowski A preprint study people latched onto as ‘proof’ ivermectin worked had errors a…
@Keptopolarbear @PussyRiotGirl @themattdimitri I sound like right wingers by saying we dont know yet snd studies are ongoing? Lol, suuuure sweetie https://t.co/ctNgBwVqUz
@SysFailure0x5a @RWMaloneMD Not assumptions. Reading actual evidence. Unless you're enough of a conspiracy nut you think the whole of Cochrane is covering something up. https://t.co/Nzw0YpUHyh
@NicoleKowalski5 @DeathMetalV @RonFilipkowski A preprint study people latched onto as ‘proof’ ivermectin worked had errors and falsified data; it was retracted. A review of 14 randomized controlled trials found no evidence to support using #ivermectin for
@runmeready @JSatyre @CocoJ126 @AP Unfortunately, there are, indeed, studies showing it can be effective in treatment for the upper respiratory infections in COVID. https://t.co/e2iRfEQ1jl However, the problem is these are based on HUMAN size doses - no
@mickmickfuzz @PointyChicken @lostandfoundtr1 @corrcomm @who_is_eL @washingtonpost Not a lie, your propaganda pushers just dont explain whats going on Ivermectin can be used in humans, but no respectable DR would for covid as no benefit (see attacheed) S
@jdking39 @lunam62 @RED_IN_PA_2 You don't. https://t.co/drPoPmvfeD
Non hanno ancora letto questo Professore @RobertoBurioni https://t.co/eadaB1T2g3
@ConspiracyBull1 A review of existing randomised controlled trials of ivermectin for covid treatment in humans found no significant differences with placebo/no treatment. https://t.co/IZ38aCcDa4
RT @nickmmark: Epic gaslighting by ivermectin zealots. Dr Wen seems to be referring to the Cochrane meta-analysis, which is the🥇standard of…
@stkirsch A bit more detailed number crunching in this one. Positive treatment effect in published studies but very high level of uncertainty https://t.co/5Eqgsx1B2j
@Lackey1981 @thejournal_ie They do, but they also treat the illness they’re approved for. Every medication has side effects but what matters is whether the benefits outweigh the risks. In the case of ivermectin, the data suggests no benefit, but some risk
@lorenzodefinti @GiovaQuez @LoredanaMaggi_ Il dosaggio lo puoi vedere qui... sempre che tu ci capisca https://t.co/Wg3jFtezvH https://t.co/kL6ZpT9uDe https://t.co/xj6QRp5NUP https://t.co/5ykSTnJXGf
@ON4Sport @earnestobob @indepdubnrth This is the gold standard meta analysis and when compared to placebo the evidence that there is any effect simply isn't there https://t.co/NdihQ0RXbF
@Barefoootz @NotoriousB_I_T @Zaylathedobe @CraigKellyMP No, but the science that says doesn't work. derp derp https://t.co/zBNVKhOEnx
@CarolCamaslp @RWMaloneMD @meltypot https://t.co/q9PaaCuMIZ The Cochrane review of studies is here and finds no evidence that Iver actually works. They are stricter on their acceptance of studies.
@TroySchuster @JoshYoheSucks @RWMaloneMD Yes, Ivermectin is an effective drug for humans... if you have scabies... Here is a proper, scientific, systematic review of its effectiveness against COVID - spoiler alert, evidence does not support its use... htt
@widowblack2220 @abcnews Here is a peer reviewed analysis of all ivermectin studies. https://t.co/HjdSSE8jXU
@truebluej @ianfmusgrave Oh I thought you were joking. It absolutely does not. Finding garbage studies to support yourself is what antivaxxers do. https://t.co/xHXwe9riku
RT @EricTopol: New and rigorous review of Ivermectin by @CochraneLibrary @cochranecollab underscores the lack of evidence that it works htt…
@BreakfastNews https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symptomatic cases show mild symptoms, including
@AnnastaciaMP https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symptomatic cases show mild symptoms, including cough,
@mister_grouper @nrsvlda @Meidas_Kiesha @sonnif68 Source on that study? The one I read couldn't prove ivermectin efficacy (human dose not horses, sheep). Same for hydroxychloroquine. They are very much experimental. They don't even have EUA. Pfizer vacci
@Canadian_Speed Ivermectin swept the medicine category for Nobel Prizes in 2015. For use in humans. Too early yet to know for certain if it will be an effective treatment, but being researched. https://t.co/JKcUkEO6gm Too early to tell, don't count it out
@Solaya04928085 @LianClodowig @Citizen4Sci @LEXPRESS @medicalfollower Petit foutaient de gueule quand même non? Pensez à retourner vos propres questions sur ce que vous préconisez. En attendant voici un état actuel des choses, dans l'attente des résultats
@debraswank @amirhkangelaan From the gold-standard Cochrane review: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials." https://t.co/VIViQA0w
@DL7010 @DeborahClaireUK Cochrane is the most reliable meta - analysis re IVM - it doesn’t https://t.co/2SHc2Dz6fO
@disabstraction @JohnnaCrider1 Is this a better source? https://t.co/nGbgbC4IrK
"Several studies are underway that may produce clearer answers in review updates. Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials." https://t
@RJBraxton2 @PannaCotta4 @AubrielleJoynes @medicalaxioms Actually you would become control trial say so https://t.co/tsxyIWdRDf
@2d_day @Drmartyufml @morandiniblog @xazalbert @rsvmike Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19. Autre chose ? https://t.co/JfvbSOMyRP
@jimmylickwall @behindmyscreen @CathyJoeGPT @BernardKerik @TwitterSupport This is a nice summary of all the studies. The conclusion is that many of the studies are not high quality or too small and they don’t show Ivermectin as effective as a treatment. ht
@ChappieA @AubrielleJoynes @medicalaxioms Yes… it is true . https://t.co/tsxyIWdRDf
RT @nickmmark: Epic gaslighting by ivermectin zealots. Dr Wen seems to be referring to the Cochrane meta-analysis, which is the🥇standard of…
Epic gaslighting by ivermectin zealots. Dr Wen seems to be referring to the Cochrane meta-analysis, which is the🥇standard of evidence & found no benefit to IVM There *IS* a lot of fraud but it’s the studies IVM zealots cite (Elegazzar, Carvallo, etc)
@deplorblMissM @RWMaloneMD @ConceptualJames Invermectin is a marvellous drug but the evidence for it as a drug effective against COVID is currently lacking. https://t.co/Eljea4u8m7
@Seriously_Gr8t @RWMaloneMD @ConceptualJames The highest quality analysis says no evidence as yet. https://t.co/Eljea4u8m7 A lot of studies have been of low quality and one with strong effect appears to be fraudulent. https://t.co/Vue2KnGO0A
@ildinolib @Lucil1Luciana @BiologiScienza Dice che arriva da qui https://t.co/Yb1AAgSCCN
@simorugg @BiologiScienza Prego, qui puoi trovare dei dati https://t.co/gMgVoWxCLX https://t.co/QxfgVNJ8BK https://t.co/W4ptkfWkHO
Interesting this one... https://t.co/3WVU4ybawj
@liriosmar @molientjedemol @MariaSofiaRR Ik volg wat de wetenschap aangeeft. Er zijn een handjevol kwakzalver artsen die beweren dat het werkt. Er zijn heel veel meer artsen die zorgvuldig onderzoek doen, en aangeven dat het niet werkt. Lees deze zorgvuldi
@liriosmar @molientjedemol @MariaSofiaRR Nee. Ivermectine. Werkt. Niet. Zie deze grote meta-analyse: https://t.co/ERwPAq2uy6
Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use #ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials. Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed https://t.co/ETt9Aoglwr
@RodneyNCulleton @jimmicbreeze People who will die from COVID taking some drug that has no scientific evidence of stopping it? Plenty… https://t.co/VztBDKIjSd
RT @RaquelBlascoR: 🤔De verdad, de verdad, te tomas #Ivermectina (revisión exhaustiva d la evidencia disponible. Conclusión ➡️NO existe evid…
@Rbk6kJ49uBkL7Nj で、どれが下記のコクランレビューを覆す程の内容がある論文ですか? リストではく、お勧めの原著論文はどれですか?とお聞きしました。 https://t.co/bn0pRnrrYu
RT @rochampbeaux: @iambackagain21 @GazziMacedo @AubrielleJoynes @medicalaxioms It doesn't treat or prevent covid. It's for worms. https://t…
RT @Prof_NickTalley: Published July 2021. Ivermectin for preventing & treating COVID‐19. “We found no evidence to support the use of iverme…