@aravindmc The problem is the inability to differentiate between politics and science That’s the science https://t.co/r3BbXmc025
@mentju4 @drbeen_medical That’s the current status of knowledge https://t.co/r3BbXmc025
@stuartcroft4 @Terpenes11 @drbeen_medical Don’t rely on any of those. Rely on scientific facts https://t.co/r3BbXmc025
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 - PubMed https://t.co/Rd6Rxb5Qd5
@NickNitro007 @thehill @SenatorLankford And this one goes over like 14 with low efficiency https://t.co/En1dfcDlDG
@lifeisfornow Read this for an unbiased view of all studies and an outline of what studies are ongoing. Adds they will review again when these become available. Gold standard Meta-analysis https://t.co/n6kt5E0Nl0
@mikepreece3 @tomhiorns @BBCRosAtkins @US_FDA @oneunderscore__ @AaronBlake https://t.co/h7OTY2Tnnu "Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19." -
@rajk1000 @PhilAtCreamCow @BBCRosAtkins @briony_sowden clearer answers in review updates. Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐designed randomized trials." h
@FrancisGgagnon @Simply_Red75 Une grande majorité des études sur ivermectin ont été retirées parce qu'entaché de plusieurs irrégularités Voici une méta analyse qui porte sur les études sérieuses Cochrane est un groupe international de spécialistes en évalu
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
@chuisti @parahablarenli1 @piopiotwit @balkraix @tobioworks @FrayJosepho @Nopanaden @SharahKasny Pues no, no es tan sencillo, porque 1) La vacuna ha demostrado eficacia (los no vacunados tienen una incidencia mucho mayor que los vacunados) 2) La ivermectin
@q_vessel @THLorg Systemaattisessa Cochrane-katsauksessa todetaan seuraavasti: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." https://t.co/k
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
@Geoppetto @AlastairMcA30 @PierreKory It’s literally a link in the tweet.
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
@fatfingersfred @NZMurph69 @WideAwakenz @alex_nz_1 @1NewsNZ They have this article on there & this is a screenshot taken from it. https://t.co/UAvMeMFxXw https://t.co/b6q5vnOlW0
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
@JeanLuclaicon @ironskin92 @RTLFrance @olivierveran @PasteurLille Ce genre de résultat par exemple... https://t.co/L4UH99KxnY
@Deathrow131 @JeanLuclaicon @ironskin92 @RTLFrance @olivierveran @PasteurLille Quand on veux faire l'état des connaissances en empilant les études sur un même sujet on fait une méta-analyse avec une bonne méthode. Je te renvoie donc à la méta-analyse de l'
In his 13 Sept. article (prior tweet), Prof. Clancy is critical of the Cochrane meta-analysis of studies into #Ivermectin as a treatment for #COVID19. That meta-analysis may be accessed here: "Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19" https://t.co/d
@ItalianPolitics non è vero che non ci sono trial clinici https://t.co/THJrjHYL6L
State of evidence regarding Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/FrtmmMFWMM
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
@Geoppetto @joeyd1121 @PierreKory Hey guys! So, the best evidence we have is from Cochrane - study quality so poor no conclusions can be drawn. And when Andrew Hill redid his meta-analysis and removed high risk of bias studies, no benefit. You’re welcome
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
@FluteOld @PierreKory Untrue, I’m afraid. And more and more evidence of fraud is being uncovered daily. https://t.co/WPxaC3rl1C
@PierreKory You mean anecdotal Pierre, as, as far as I am aware, there are no reputable studies showing either efficacy or safety. https://t.co/TRi0sgYuqm
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
@mantistrader @WideAwakenz @NZMurph69 @alex_nz_1 @1NewsNZ This article debunks what you've been saying about Ivermectin helping to beat covid. https://t.co/UAvMeMFxXw https://t.co/UAvMeMFxXw https://t.co/qgKweP0ro9
@TerlouwArie @telegraaf @blckbxnews @ArtsenC Tuurlijk maestro, geen probleem :) Hier een metastudie van anderhalve maand geleden: https://t.co/P42tOFF0U6
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
@soft_fox_lad @neolibwill For example: This study shows that there's no solid conclusion that can be made about the effectiveness of an "Ivermectin only" regimen https://t.co/KgbeM4D0Nq
@AlexBradley68 @dinkytown13 @HelloMrSmith @45rapeKatiejohn @cochranecollab "Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19" @cochranecollab https://t.co/vmKAJeUhMA https://t.co/hjIu5IQ2A9
@SusannaLHarris https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Moderate, severe, and critical cases (approximately 20%), with the need for oxygen supplementation, ventilatory support, or intensive medical care, cause a considerable burden for healthcare systems. Defined risk fac
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
RT @OrlandoRPN: La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌…
La Ivermectina NO ha demostrado beneficio para tratar el COVID-19 y no se tampoco se garantizar su seguridad: NO LA USEN ❌ https://t.co/MuaRNyIeK4 https://t.co/WUq3Az8Qgl
@artazin8 @unhealthytruth That is an IVM propaganda site. This might help: https://t.co/AQge4x4sXb
@nan4tjn @jax4336 @MrsMainstreamed @Count_Zara @WebMD @cvspharmacy August 2021 Reputable medical source: https://t.co/THJPdP4q8l
@jax4336 @nan4tjn @MrsMainstreamed @Count_Zara @WebMD @cvspharmacy August 2021 Reputable medical source: https://t.co/THJPdP4q8l
@LI_politico
@miikka_korhonen @VVElomaa @THLorg @mika_salminen Koska se "keskustelu" on sitä että esitätte valheellisia väitteitä joita eivät tutkimukset tue ollenkaan. Ivermectin ei toimi Koronan hoidossa. https://t.co/afvKbd8BpY
@CraigVecellio @dr_colemami @unhealthytruth @k10Aug @thatsnotmine125 @nursey40 @MichaelYeadon3 @AlCmarmite @MaureenStroud @amin_yakar @ireallyamahuman @SwaledaleMutton @TwitterSupport @InCytometry The vaccine is not a treatment because it is not used when
@miikka_korhonen @VVElomaa @THLorg @mika_salminen Se ei ole toimiva lääke https://t.co/afvKbd8BpY
@miikka_korhonen @VVElomaa @THLorg @mika_salminen Se ei ole toimiva lääke. https://t.co/afvKbd8BpY
@miikka_korhonen @VVElomaa @THLorg @mika_salminen Mikä toimiva lääke se muka on?? 😂😂😂 Mistä olet tuollaista harhatietoa löytänyt?? https://t.co/afvKbd8BpY
@Clavikul @Songbir40253612 @LeiJulietta @QuentinDempster Regarding the current status of Ivermectin, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment o
@afderas @ilventomatteo @DavidPuente In realtà l'inutilità dell'ivm è stata confermata dalla revisione Cochrane che non ha nulla a che fare con questa persona "Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library" https://t.c
@kicknrip @mizlemonie @chickybabe_71 @UnitedAusParty https://t.co/zBNVKhOEnx Look up pubmed or scholar there are thousands more just like this
@PMassey18 @ashishkjha If you want to find out the current status of Ivermectin, from experts, there’s a link to a proper systematic review below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of Ivermectin for treatment or prev
@MarkGerhard5 @DrHeatherICU @MaryFernando_ Dude, you’re kidding. That’s funny https://t.co/al4dFvS2d0
@RaoulVo49176831 @audreyriva Nier l'efficacité et l'utilité du vaccin et prôner un traitement qui ne marche pas, joli... https://t.co/89oiAFo7Xj
RT @Lasterbosire: @CikuNjongo @ppbkenya @LeonLidigu @NationAfrica 😂😂😂.. i think i’ve been reading too much! Ahh, Ivermectin. Here is what…
RT @milopadat: @Amnafq__ @Archangel28_ @aemieruls_ Eropah mana yg cakap tu? Bagi bukti research yg dah dibuat. Jangan cakap saja, tin koson…
@MichyUK @RealDeniseWelch We'd have tons of a drug that possibly reduces severity of symptoms a bit. https://t.co/g3GrdTND8i
@RealDeniseWelch It gets discussed openly in medical journals, precisely where those discussions should take place. https://t.co/g3GrdTND8i
@KirralieS @JaggerMickOZ The TGA has remarkably continued to provide accurate advice throughout the Pandemic. Do you think a nationwide shortage causing amongst other things blindness in hundreds of people from parasitic eye disease is a good thing? http
Yo, como buen millennial buscando pelea: META ANALISIS DE TODOS LOS ESTUDIOS QUE NO ENCUENTRAN EVIDENCIA SUFICIENTE PARA JODER EL HIGADO DEL PACIENTE: https://t.co/3RViMXgfYq
RT @chris_steff: For anyone wanting to do their own research on ivermectin, systematic reviews are always the best place to start l, and @c…
RT @SwaledaleMutton: @CJlegalBeagle @unhealthytruth Here is the Cochrane review (the gold standard for meta-analyses): https://t.co/AQge4x4…
@CJlegalBeagle @unhealthytruth Here is the Cochrane review (the gold standard for meta-analyses): https://t.co/AQge4x4sXb
@wartime_bride @McgarvyRobert @CraigKellyMP No one is censoring the use of Ivermectin. It's just no one has been able to prove it works/doesn't work. Here is a paper that reviews almost 50 Ivermectin studies. https://t.co/9DkLtxLqpg
@herbthefox1 No. There arent. Im well aware of the evidence base. Youre making huge presumptions here. Contrary to your belief, doctors do keep up to date with evidence in their area of expertise. ACCPs also do. https://t.co/g3GrdTND8i
@unhealthytruth Are judges scientists? Nope. Can you point me to just one reputable peer reviewed DBRCT study showing efficacy and safety? Nope. Sorry Erin, as much as you may hold PK and the FLCCC in high regard, you are sadly misguided: https://t.co/TRi0
@skar_of Quite simply there isn't enough evidence from studies using the human form to prove one way or another. As it stands the evidence doesn't support it's use for treatment of COVID - it's a long way off being the cure all panacea the right think it i