@bennoba @Peter_Fitz @JohnRuddick2 Here's a peer reviewed, review of nearly every study on the subject, not one that's cherry picked and easily scrutinised: https://t.co/KN8hOnQAOX
@RWMaloneMD What Malone presents here is just smoke and mirrors. All one needs to know vis-a-vis Ivermectin is right here: https://t.co/AyKLwSqn5L "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID‐19 infection, but th
@peter_snape @DeanCoulson @JohnBoweActor Cochrane is the most reliable meta-analysis. https://t.co/2SHc2Dz6fO
@m_dom_d @DeanCoulson @JohnBoweActor R.O.B.U.S.T. data. https://t.co/2SHc2Dz6fO
@sliver459 @DeanCoulson @JohnBoweActor There are but no studies are robust. https://t.co/2SHc2DQH7m
@britishnblue @DeanCoulson @JohnBoweActor Yes I read it. You should read Cochrane. The study that had the most influence in that has since been discredited. From Cochrane https://t.co/2SHc2DQH7m
@adriannamariet @msfella @inshorts When analysing all studies and put them together, the drug does not live up to expectations: “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support using ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of
@JohnBoweActor Don't work John. Whoever told you it did is a big old liar. Oh, and AZ is cheaper than IVM. https://t.co/TRi0sgYuqm
@evasmagacz @thatsnotmine125 @JohnBoweActor Don't work. Oh, R Malone paid $78 for IVM (post vaccination). AZ is $3 You do the maths https://t.co/TRi0sgYuqm
#Ivermectin "Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library" https://t.co/HAHZLrbYEh
@RWMaloneMD Why does this meta-analysis disagree? It was offered to me as evidence against ivermectin https://t.co/m5mGsGvYQu
1 or 2 studies out of over sixty plus.... mmmmm... ok cool... so you are saying we should let people including breakthroughs and Long Haulers just suffer without trying...mmmm... not so cool #Ivermectin #IvermectinWarriors https://t.co/iBkixxIYvB
@box_a_chocluts @juliamorris9 Actual pic of FG. I know science and research is hard. Just ignore it. 🤣 https://t.co/3ZHvrEa31d https://t.co/SZoDHrEBdj https://t.co/jUiRWvFTwP https://t.co/Cmvm3B3nsv https://t.co/GMRXYKxMD1 Refute these, show us your
@Anna5705 This analysis includes one fraudulent study and several others under investigation. Also omits the cochrane review.https://t.co/g3GrdU5dZQ FLCCC know how evidence based medicine works. If they spent time and resources on studies, not disingenuous
@bourbonisgood2 @SwaledaleMutton @pmcox @groin_hammer @olyldnh8covid @BadDude62 @richeggleston @k_b_lvi @onebetterthanQ @thisisnothappen @compsciman @PierreKory @TwitterSafety @TwitterSupport We do as it stands. I don't freakin' work. https://t.co/TRi0sgYu
@gangula09441934 @CochraneLibrary @CochraneConsumr We welcome comments on specific reviews, please see here https://t.co/kCbgUSoL3A For this review, you can submit your comment/concerns at https://t.co/F0PwlrWV0Y so that it may go through the proper channe
@aus_macca @raudzini @grumpyeconomist @Peter_Fitz @TonyHWindsor Here’s a link to a proper, systematic review of Ivermectin below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐1
@bennoba @Peter_Fitz Here’s your answer… a proper systematic review of Ivermectin, link below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19” https://t.co/VztBDKIjSd
@bennoba @Peter_Fitz @JohnRuddick2 Or… You could learn something by reading a proper systematic review of Ivermectin, link below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐1
@gangula09441934 @CochraneLibrary @CochraneConsumr '#Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19' systematic review is available here: https://t.co/jdRm2rt5Zz #OpenAcess https://t.co/3mt9LoBdfF
@LaharRises @dingbattus @JohnRuddick2 Or, you know, follow the science… There’s a link to a proper, scientific, systematic review of Ivermectin below. TL:DR “Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or
RT @CochraneIberoam: Nuevo podcast habla de la #RevisiónSistemática sobre #ivermectina realizada por @CochraneHaem , donde no se encontró e…
@bennoba @Peter_Fitz @JohnRuddick2 The evidence shows no decline or improvement. But there are 31 proper studies underway. https://t.co/QKr9afrZDm
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/VSMoB0Jeba
@normanswan https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symptomatic cases show mild symptoms,
@KKeneally Read this..https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symptomatic cases show mild symptoms,
@RealCarlVernon https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symptomatic cases show mild symptoms,
@TonyHinton2016 https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symptomatic cases show mild symptoms, Maybe ...
@normanswan https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symptomatic cases show mild symptoms,
@hannah_siden @rustyrockets Wake up we are trying to protect you https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symp
RT @ProfAdeeba: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19. Overall, the reliable evidence av…
@MamaDoctorJones Ivermectin has been successful in treating covid and particularly in vitro, however studies and articles showing success have been because of the nature of emergency use authorization to support vaccine mandates, all alternatives are being
RT @proteinwisdom: So don’t use it. Ivermectin alone is not what I’ve promoted. It has 22 methods of action. In Covid, it acts as a compet…
RT @ConsueloBurrito: @johnnylawdog @Chris_Chapman61 @sweetkeet @veryvirology @CryptoKashmir Here is a very well regarded review of 41 studi…
@HillaryGuess @stolemysoul79 @OHSupremeCourt The Cochrane review, which is the gold standard for this type of analysis: https://t.co/50MsaGTcfx https://t.co/8gBzw7IpOp
@johnnylawdog @Chris_Chapman61 @sweetkeet @veryvirology @CryptoKashmir Here is a very well regarded review of 41 studies. The authors' conclusion is that there is no conclusive evidence that Ivermectin is effective used against COVID-19. https://t.co/slR
@zeeman2121 @RonFilipkowski Except it doesn’t work https://t.co/tsxyIWvsuN
RT @JacobGudiol: @NaudetFlorian This Cochrane review did it properly on ivermectin https://t.co/I6049jlh8e https://t.co/zehzFYgWwi
RT @JacobGudiol: @NaudetFlorian This Cochrane review did it properly on ivermectin https://t.co/I6049jlh8e https://t.co/zehzFYgWwi
@AnupamKhemariya @PBNMorg @damn_thatsvegan @AdamJoshDotCom @desireevzg Sure, it's great if you have worms. Otherwise, it's absolute bullshit. Be skeptical. There are charlatans everywhere. https://t.co/DiPwtgqhed https://t.co/9yvphKoek9 I prefer veggieme
@NaudetFlorian This Cochrane review did it properly on ivermectin https://t.co/I6049jlh8e https://t.co/zehzFYgWwi
RT @proteinwisdom: So don’t use it. Ivermectin alone is not what I’ve promoted. It has 22 methods of action. In Covid, it acts as a compet…
So don’t use it. Ivermectin alone is not what I’ve promoted. It has 22 methods of action. In Covid, it acts as a competitive binding agent to keep the virus out of healthy cells, shortening replication and reducing viral load. It’s part of a cocktail.
@proteinwisdom Cochrane is the world's leader at summarizing medical evidence, and they concluded this about ivermectin. There's simply not any reliable study supporting ivermectin's use here. https://t.co/r3iuCFP5qv https://t.co/85FmjKNrFl
@RonaldGump4 @Jamesmartian60 @FrogsInHarmony @trish_regan Because there are still conflicting conclusions (one example): https://t.co/wK7TtZQHxe
Att så många skulle ha helt fejk data och vara helt påhittade från ingenting har överraskat mig ändå får jag säga. Men att kvalitén på studierna varit usel har varit tydligt länge nu. Därför Cochrane skrev så här tex https://t.co/p56lYD4L6N
@foxy_huang @RWMaloneMD @12_07_1961 @maddow @MSNBC @FDA_Drug_Info @US_FDA There was a study done of 114 ivermectin studies showing it works very well. Just Google "Scholarly" and the nouns for research articles https://t.co/vt82dwBryk https://t.co/K4RdtM
RT @OPalanca: @mariana057 Here is an article from a reliable scientific publication regarding the effectiveness of Ivermectin in preventing…
@Dorry_Segev The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally. https://t.co/Vyv0puBX6K
@DoctorKarl On ivermectin. Reference cochrane report attached. UK deaths as regards death cert numbers are about 158k. Your correct figure is the 28 day/positive test count. https://t.co/AGPgCrsBFl
@Bonbonhamilton eyeroll "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19" from a (more current than your cited paper from April) highly respected Cochrane review. sorry, you're just wro
Estudios actualizados a Mayo 2021 👇 #ivermectina https://t.co/mYakkD3aHX
@SteveSimonovic @scrowder "Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19. " https://t.co/p5sQXxBHsY
@OuryDiall0 @BFMTV https://t.co/Pemgsgn3JW https://t.co/BHxt0asA4e Au cas où vous ne le savez pas, la revue cochrane fait référence dans le milieu scientifique et médicale.
y todavía esta en los protocolos oficiales de algunas provincias...
RT @CochraneIberoam: Nuevo podcast habla de la #RevisiónSistemática sobre #ivermectina realizada por @CochraneHaem , donde no se encontró e…
RT @CochraneIberoam: Nuevo podcast habla de la #RevisiónSistemática sobre #ivermectina realizada por @CochraneHaem , donde no se encontró e…
RT @CochraneIberoam: Nuevo podcast habla de la #RevisiónSistemática sobre #ivermectina realizada por @CochraneHaem , donde no se encontró e…
RT @CochraneIberoam: Nuevo podcast habla de la #RevisiónSistemática sobre #ivermectina realizada por @CochraneHaem , donde no se encontró e…
RT @CochraneIberoam: Nuevo podcast habla de la #RevisiónSistemática sobre #ivermectina realizada por @CochraneHaem , donde no se encontró e…
RT @CochraneIberoam: Nuevo podcast habla de la #RevisiónSistemática sobre #ivermectina realizada por @CochraneHaem , donde no se encontró e…
RT @CochraneIberoam: Nuevo podcast habla de la #RevisiónSistemática sobre #ivermectina realizada por @CochraneHaem , donde no se encontró e…
RT @CochraneIberoam: Nuevo podcast habla de la #RevisiónSistemática sobre #ivermectina realizada por @CochraneHaem , donde no se encontró e…
Nuevo podcast habla de la #RevisiónSistemática sobre #ivermectina realizada por @CochraneHaem , donde no se encontró evidencia para apoyar su uso para tratar o prevenir la infección por #COVID19 Podcast 👉https://t.co/zR6IXTXXYr Revisión👉https://t.co/IRfyN
@EARL_COVID19_tw @TV00112 https://t.co/MPRPwiO1j5 コクランのメタアナリシス はこちら。
RT @hj_whiterabbit: This systematic review of #Ivermectin studies reports considerable issues with blinding and other biases in about 1/3 s…
@A_Ra_Berlin Кохрейн не уверен в его безопасности и эффективности https://t.co/nfp0iGNT3h
This systematic review of #Ivermectin studies reports considerable issues with blinding and other biases in about 1/3 studies. Note these studies include 1678 patients in total, compared to >70,000 in clinical trials for COVID vaccines - https://t.co/Y
知らなかったけどコクラン出てるやんけ
@nicole_in_AB @CMOH_Alberta @shandro @jkenney Here is the more recent meta-analysis that excludes the retracted study and those that used combination therapies. And surprise the confidence intervals are all over the place https://t.co/0OUg3SCAHC
@bbbozzz @MartinKulldorff https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symptomatic cases show mild symptoms,
@TheKloppStand @MartinKulldorff https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symptomatic cases show mild symptoms,
@AlastairMcA30 @MartinKulldorff https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symptomatic cases show mild symptoms,
@ArtKorenevsky @MartinKulldorff https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symptomatic cases show mild symptoms,
@axnslash @BFMTV C'est un fait. https://t.co/5wxQ7xdodM
@bluebir58889827 @les_vaxxeuses @axnslash @BFMTV Et si prenait une source un peu plus sérieuse qu'une vidéo youtube ? https://t.co/gjXElX5x1P
@chadpettitt @patriottakes And it has not overall proven to be effective. #HydroxyChloroquine monoclonal antibodies, #ivermectin are all still experimental. Only Regeneron has EUA which was supposedly a deterrent to vaccines but can't use that excuse for P
@mggarciab Aquí un meta-analisis de la cochrane library https://t.co/dhAVmJyJhu
@Yair__Lahav @nur_ro1 אם אתה רציני, אז חוץ מהמחקר הלבנוני על איברמקטין, יש לא מעט מחקרים אחרים שמראים תוצאות שונות לחלוטין. יש כאן מאמר סקירה שאסף וניתח את המחקרים בנושא. https://t.co/DO0nU1GUKX
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/zpaffE7x2m
@ninaeunice4 @kustenwelle @StreuliRoland @Politikbeobach6 https://t.co/hV4AOkdxP5 Und nun troll dich mit deinen Schrott.
@heijsenburger @umbbv @ajrasker @Els__nadine @Marc_Veld underway that may produce clearer answers in review updates. Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19 outside of well‐design
@BMG_Bund https://t.co/Bfui6Ns9bl sagen wir es ist nicht bewiesen und besser Placebo einzusetzen als ein Medikament mit potenziellen Nebenwirkungen.
@kanke20108489 @X8p7QIOoOLrFcKB @dsk42406081 https://t.co/uQfZt6qc08 コクランのメタアナリシス はこちら。 (コクランは医学論文のシステマティック・レビューを行なう国際的団体で、質の高いシステマティック・レビューとして定評があると厚労省も認めています)
𝖫σs rеsυƖtаdσs dе sυs еstυdiσs sе pυbƖicаrσп еп Ɩа rеνistа Е𝖬ВО 𝖬σƖеcυƖаr 𝖬еdiciпе еƖ 28 dе jυƖіο dе 2021. https://t.co/TMQECrbpel 𝖴п апȧƖіѕіѕ dе Ɩσs rеsυƖtаdσs dе σtrа iпνеstigаciόп pυbƖicаdа еп еƖ Аmеricап ЈσυrпаƖ σf Тhеrаpеυtics iпstа а Ɩаs pꜷtаs →
@BergWaara @larsxsamuelsson Läs riktig forskning i stället: https://t.co/IrpFsitCep
RT @CochraneLibrary: Main @Cochrane_IDG authors, Maria Popp & Stephanie Weibel said: “Current evidence does not support using #ivermectin…
RT @ZulmaCucunuba: ¿Podemos por favor cerrar el tema de ivermectina para covid-19? La ivermectina es un gran medicamento, de gran importa…
@NICKIMINAJ https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symptomatic cases show mild symptoms,
@Sevrahn @NICKIMINAJ https://t.co/N3TipynEYo Available data suggest that one-third of SARS-CoV-2 infections remain asymptomatic (Oran 2021), but there is still uncertainty around this estimate. About 80% of symptomatic cases show mild symptoms,